Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

End of an Era: Death of the U.S. Pickup Truck
The Street ^ | 06/10/11 | Frank Byrt

Posted on 06/12/2011 8:22:40 AM PDT by nhwingut

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-177 next last
To: nhwingut

This scumbag liberal must be looking at the sales figures from GM! Heh Heh Heh....
My home has 4 pickups parked here.


41 posted on 06/12/2011 8:45:29 AM PDT by US_MilitaryRules (Where is our military?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dainbramaged

We always called that primer, lol.


42 posted on 06/12/2011 8:45:59 AM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Abin Sur

“the fact remains that pickup truck sales have gone from almost 20% fifteen years ago down to 12% this year, with a forecast of 10% for the near future. “

I think the loss in market share can be attributed to CAFE standards...the automakers discount small cars and put a premium on pickups and SUVs, to meet CAFE....good ole’ government interference.

And, I believe SUV sales have put a dent into the market share.

The latest fuel standards, which I believe kick in in 2016, will be a death blow for pickups...so this article is pre-emptively calling the sector dead, before fuel standards get blamed.


43 posted on 06/12/2011 8:48:13 AM PDT by lacrew (Mr. Soetoro, we regret to inform you that your race card is over the credit limit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: digger48

My 91 Chevy has 296 K on it. It still pulls the trailers and hauls anything and everything. It can still work harder and better than most vehicles that are half it age and half its milage.


44 posted on 06/12/2011 8:50:27 AM PDT by notpoliticallycorewrecked (According to the MSM, I'm a fringe sitting, pajama wearing, Freeper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Lucky

The ironic thing is it was the small pickups that MADE Nissan in America.


45 posted on 06/12/2011 8:51:02 AM PDT by LS ("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually." (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MattinNJ
I drive an F-150,love my beat up old pick-up.I think we are way over 100,000 miles.About 7 years ago a woman rear ended me.She lost her bumper and smashed up the front for her car.I walked around my truck and didn't have a scratch.Hope you get well soon MattinNJ ((((Hugs))))
46 posted on 06/12/2011 8:51:13 AM PDT by fatima (Free Hugs Today:))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut

Here in the Colorado Rockies just about everyone owns either a large 4WD SUV or a pick-up truck. I personally drive a Ford F350 diesel I purchased new in 2000. I traded in an F250 that I had owned for 10 years when I bought this one.

Our small car is a 1982 4WD Toyota we purchased in 1982. We traded in a Nissan pickup for that vehicle. I have a tendency to take care of and hang on to my vehicles. I’ve never really understood the need to constantly trade every couple years.


47 posted on 06/12/2011 8:52:51 AM PDT by Graneros (I want to go peacefully like my Dad did, in his sleep -- not screaming, like his passengers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard

http://blogs.cars.com/kickingtires/2010/12/top-10-best-selling-cars-november-2010.html

Looks like the Ford F-150 is still #1, by a mile. Sales up 29%.


48 posted on 06/12/2011 8:53:30 AM PDT by Beagle8U (Free Republic -- One stop shopping ....... It's the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut

Truck sales would be booming right now if a standard full-sized pickup didn’t weigh around 5000 pounds. Heck, the little Ranger is at 4000+ pounds these days, more than a Ford F-100 weighed back in the 1970’s. That heft doesn’t help mileage a bit.

My 1983 Ranger weighed a little over 3000 pounds, and with a 4 cylinder engine and 4-speed stick (they didn’t have the 5-speed yet), still managed 30 MPG on the highway.


49 posted on 06/12/2011 8:54:10 AM PDT by meyer (We will not sit down and shut up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut
Ford has dropped the Ranger because the new F150 is only 10% bigger.

I am guessing it gets gas mileage comparable to the 29 MPG I get with my Ranger when I run it on non-ethanol gas.

I get 22 MPG with ethanol gas, and my state requires it if the price is not too high. Right now they are not putting ethanol in the gas, and I get dramatically better mileage.

50 posted on 06/12/2011 8:59:30 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (If Sarah Palin really was unelectable, state-run media would be begging the GOP to nominate her.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fatima
I drive an F-150,love my beat up old pick-up.I think we are way over 100,000 miles.

Same here. 140k on my F150. Will ride it for another 10 years I hope. Plenty of dings and scratches, but super safe and hauls good.

And while my wife complains about the gas, she's always using it when she goes antique shopping (looks like Sanford and Son when she comes home)... LOL!
51 posted on 06/12/2011 9:01:27 AM PDT by nhwingut (Palin '12... Accept No Other)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: lacrew
And, I believe SUV sales have put a dent into the market share.

Good point on SUVs. The modern SUV was invented about 25 years in the form of the Jeep Cherokee.

The latest fuel standards, which I believe kick in in 2016, will be a death blow for pickups...so this article is pre-emptively calling the sector dead, before fuel standards get blamed.

Wouldn't it be wonderful if the government simply let the market decide what we drive? With gas prices going through the roof I do most of my driving in my Mini Cooper S, and get 35 mpg. Of course, when there's a foot of snow I switch back to the 18 mpg Cherokee...but that's my choice.

52 posted on 06/12/2011 9:02:45 AM PDT by Abin Sur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: vetvetdoug

I have a 2003 Ranger XLT with 160K on the clock and am looking at replacing it later this year and will probably go Toyota. I see nothing in GM or Dodge that impresses me and not a whole lot in Fordland.


53 posted on 06/12/2011 9:05:51 AM PDT by wally_bert (It's sheer elegance in its simplicity! - The Middleman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: digger48

Doubt I will be buying another truck. My ‘03 F-350 just got ten new spark plugs and it has 92,000 miles on it. It’s gonna outlast me.


54 posted on 06/12/2011 9:08:20 AM PDT by Second Amendment First ("Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not..." - Thomas Jefferson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut

If we simply ditched the environmentally useless and economically harmful CAFE standards it would instantly make trucks more affordable.


55 posted on 06/12/2011 9:09:02 AM PDT by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut

The ol’ ‘89 F-150 six cylinder sits up by the barn most of its days, but when I need it I just turn the key, and go.

I can’t imagine my life without it.


56 posted on 06/12/2011 9:10:18 AM PDT by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will, they ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut

I have a 2004 Dodge Ram with the Hemi, and a Honda Civic Si. The truck gets a little usage, but my primary driver is the Honda. There’s a big difference between 32 mpg and 14 mpg, not to mention the handling and ‘fun to drive’ factor! But when I need to haul something, or tow, the truck gets ‘er done! Plus, the 4WD does come in handy on occasion.


57 posted on 06/12/2011 9:10:43 AM PDT by meyer (We will not sit down and shut up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Born to Conserve

Well you can get them, like mine, with the under-carriage built several inches higher. This is of course for better clearance particularly for snow. But you are right the vast majority of pickups are jacked up for show only leaving the differential(s) about 6 inches off the ground. That leaves them pretty much useless for anything but freeway or city driving. You get a one foot snowfall (very common in my neck of the woods) and those things are going nowhere.


58 posted on 06/12/2011 9:10:43 AM PDT by Graneros (I want to go peacefully like my Dad did, in his sleep -- not screaming, like his passengers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: meyer

Car size creep. A 1990 Camry weighed 2700 lbs and had 115hp. A new Corolla is the same size and weight as the ‘90 Camry but has 132hp.

And there are no small pickups any more.


59 posted on 06/12/2011 9:14:00 AM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

I know it’s primer paint, just gave it a deluxe description because I love old trucks :>)


60 posted on 06/12/2011 9:17:04 AM PDT by dainbramaged (I lost my mantra around 1969.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-177 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson