Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ear-mounted cameras serve as witnesses for JoCo deputies (Johnson County, Kansas)
http://www.kansascity.com/2011/06/12/2945470/johnson-county-deputies-fitted.html ^ | June 13, 2011 | JOE LAMBE

Posted on 06/13/2011 8:42:17 AM PDT by Second Amendment First

Edited on 06/13/2011 8:06:36 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

The RoboCop look is coming nationwide, a law enforcement supplier says, and Johnson County deputies are on the cutting edge as they test cameras they wear on their ears.

Executives at Taser International Inc. hope the company

(Excerpt) Read more at kansascity.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: corruption; dirtycops; donutwatch; overpriced; police; policeoverlords; tech
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
Comment #1 Removed by Moderator

To: Second Amendment First
I wonder how the cops will respond to "civilians" who are wearing one?

Before or after you refuse to remove it?

2 posted on 06/13/2011 8:44:52 AM PDT by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

Next step after the Dash Cam.


3 posted on 06/13/2011 8:44:53 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First
I'd bet dollars to doughnut-holes that the cops would arrest you for wearing one of these to document THEIR activities.
4 posted on 06/13/2011 8:45:13 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (If Sarah Palin really was unelectable, state-run media would be begging the GOP to nominate her.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

This stuff has been out for a while, and there are far less expensive units on the market.

Everything from ear pieces and sunglasses, to video recording watches and pens.


5 posted on 06/13/2011 8:47:37 AM PDT by MrEdd (Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First
The motorcycle dude did not have a good time while wearing his.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UK3u-C__4T8

6 posted on 06/13/2011 8:50:11 AM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrEdd
This stuff has been out for a while, and there are far less expensive units on the market.

But not ones with enough battery life and storage for an entire shift.

7 posted on 06/13/2011 8:51:20 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

Not well. I wonder too how many will malfunction at critical times. They look as if they could be easily dislodged.

On balance though, this should be helpful.


8 posted on 06/13/2011 8:58:37 AM PDT by Psalm 144 (Voodoo Republicans: Don't read their lips - watch their hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

“test cameras they wear on their ears. “

Source material for the next generation of COPS television shows.


9 posted on 06/13/2011 9:00:15 AM PDT by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First
Of course I'm going to trust that the video hasn't been altered, or partially erased, or simply disappeared, when I protest against police brutality. /sarc
10 posted on 06/13/2011 9:17:59 AM PDT by JoeFromSidney (New book: RESISTANCE TO TYRANNY. A primer on armed revolt. Available form Amazon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

That’s BS!!!

Dude did not have flashing lights, presented no evidence of being LEO and Pulls a gun?

I think the car the LEO was driving was his personal car. This guy wasn’t a plain clothes officer. He was off work.

I hope this guy sues the city or county of this LEO.


11 posted on 06/13/2011 9:24:10 AM PDT by Vendome ("Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it anyway")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

OMG!!!! THE BORG ARE HERE!!!

Resistance is futile!!!!!!!!!!!


12 posted on 06/13/2011 9:24:35 AM PDT by NFHale (The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeFromSidney
Of course I'm going to trust that the video hasn't been altered, or partially erased, or simply disappeared, when I protest against police brutality. /sarc

On the other hand, if I'm on a jury, and the police say a video was "lost" or "damaged', all testimony by the police becomes immediately suspect, if not outright tainted.

13 posted on 06/13/2011 9:26:38 AM PDT by zeugma (The only thing in the social security trust fund is your children and grandchildren's sweat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

I think it’s just fine if every moment of every shift is recorded, and any gaps are construed against the prosecution.

If cops have these but aren’t wearing them off duty, they are to have no special rights or privileges (such as carrying a gun when and where citizens can’t).

The recordings must be public record, with limitations for police investigation matters.


14 posted on 06/13/2011 9:27:48 AM PDT by Atlas Sneezed (End the "Fiscal Fiasco" in 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NFHale
My first thought as well...

15 posted on 06/13/2011 9:28:55 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: NFHale

16 posted on 06/13/2011 9:29:12 AM PDT by apastron (I miss the good old days - when bankers just jumped out of a window...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

Local cops here already have the cameras that attach to the front of their uniforms.


17 posted on 06/13/2011 9:35:29 AM PDT by goseminoles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First
I wonder how the cops will respond to "civilians" who are wearing one?

Here in Austin, the APD officers have been buying the cameras for themselves. There have been several PD related shootings, and the Justice Bros have been on their case. Sometimes the dash cams did not get the actual shooting footage, so the PD is protecting themselves.

18 posted on 06/13/2011 9:37:12 AM PDT by Arrowhead1952 (zero hates Texas and we hate him back. He ain't my president either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrB; apastron

What I really need to know is this...

Just exactly WHERE do the Borg insert that damned giant BATTERY PACK?!?!?


19 posted on 06/13/2011 9:40:09 AM PDT by NFHale (The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: NFHale

They use lithiums...


20 posted on 06/13/2011 9:44:17 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson