Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin

You know, it was only 35 years ago that the New York Times was still considered a credible and trustworthy newspaper. In fact, it was even known to many people back then as “the newspaper of record”. My, how the mighty have fallen! Nowadays, the National Enquirer has more credibility.


13 posted on 06/13/2011 10:24:33 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Lancey Howard
You know, it was only 35 years ago that the New York Times was still considered a credible and trustworthy newspaper.

That was perception only; a faulty one. NYT, owned by a Jewish family,(ironically) refused to print stories about the holocaust and the horrific abuses being perpetrated against the Jews and others during the Nazi reign of terror in WWII. From all accounts, the Times was fully aware of what was happening.

A newspaper that did that, no doubt printed stories with an agenda all along. The Times credibility was an illusion only.

The only difference between WWII, 35 years ago and now is that the maggots have been found out so they no longer make any attempt to 'hide' their nefarious intentions.

25 posted on 06/13/2011 11:19:07 AM PDT by Outlaw Woman ("...; because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee,... "Hosea 4:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson