Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Boehner warns Obama that Libya will violate war powers
Washington Examiner ^ | 06/14/11 3:34 PM | By: Susan Ferrechio

Posted on 06/14/2011 2:03:28 PM PDT by Red Badger

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-118 last
To: Drill Thrawl

Oh, I agree, there’s plenty to be frustrated about.

I don’t think Boehner, for example, is evil or even a total RINO, but he certainly wasn’t a good choice for the position. However, while a lot of conservatives were elected in November, the vast majority of the GOPers that were already in Congress are probably more on the RINO side than anything else. So I suppose it was inevitable that somebody like him would be the choice, and we have to think within that context about how we can get him to do a better job and how we can get more conservatives elected the next time around.

My point was that the same crude, tired old blustering about various people’s lack of male sexual equipment or some other kneejerk response on some issue doesn’t really get us anywhere, doesn’t help us to understand the issues (since many Freepers seem to post without ever looking at anything other than an inflammatory or biased headline), and doesn’t make us very effective at exerting any pressure in favor of our ideas.


101 posted on 06/15/2011 6:40:15 AM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: PghBaldy

Thanks for the link, PghBaldy.


102 posted on 06/15/2011 6:43:49 AM PDT by Girlene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Munz
They think that we were placated with 2010.

That's what I'm afraid of.

As for the impeachment of Obama, while it would never happen, even if it did, it wouldn't necessarily result in his removal from office (think Bill Clinton). So we'd be back to square one.

103 posted on 06/15/2011 6:44:17 AM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Crybaby Boehner and the rest of the GOP clowns get paid to placate and sooth so-called conservatives and other well meaning but gullible American dupes with slogans and platitudes while behind the scenes they work with their Democrat pals to implement the Globalist Agenda. I don’t care what letters Boner writes or what threats of funding cuts or impeachment the GOP makes the fact is the bombs WILL continue to rain down on Lybian kids until Qaddafi is gone. Just like how the useless talk and empty promises spewed forth by Bush and the GOP about the border didn’t change the fact that thousands of Third World invaders crossed every single day until ten of millions of them transformed the country into a Third World pit. Its lie, lie, lie, delay, delay, delay while the Agenda moves ever forward.


104 posted on 06/15/2011 7:39:45 AM PDT by Roninf5-1 (If ignorance is bliss why are so many Americans on anti-depressants?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Right and I thought I read somewhere where they had a meeting...or at least committees/leaders, someone met w/Obama on BEFORE going in....I remember b/c I couldn’t believe the fake outrage from the Congressional Repubs that Obama hadn’t talked to them....I could be totally wrong here....I’ll check into it.... maybe someone can clear that up for me....


105 posted on 06/15/2011 8:40:25 AM PDT by DrewsMum (There is no other NAME whereby we may be saved....JESUS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Pravious
That’s because 99% of our politicians are 99% IMPURE.

Then you might as well give up on voting or supporting candidates altogether. Because there's no point in voting at all.

106 posted on 06/15/2011 9:18:20 AM PDT by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: All
Look,Obama’s plan all along is to surround Israel with Jew hating jihadists.
Why else is he giving a pass to countries run by Jew hating bastards while regime changing the others?
Gadafy and Mubarak had no love for Jews yet they had no desire to attack Israel so they had to go.
Others like them are next.
107 posted on 06/15/2011 9:19:54 AM PDT by Happy Rain (2012= "E quindi uscimmo a riveder le stelle.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan
Will Obama sign it? Will it even get a vote in the Senate? Otherwise it's just theater.

What else can he do? Boehner isn't dictator -- he's just the Speaker when the Senate and Presidency are controlled by the other party. He's doing what he's supposed to do on this issue.

108 posted on 06/15/2011 9:20:44 AM PDT by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Happy Rain; potlatch; devolve; ntnychik; dixiechick2000; Diogenesis
Look,Obama’s plan all along is to surround Israel with Jew hating jihadists.

Why else is he giving a pass to countries run by Jew hating bastards while regime changing the others?

Gadafy and Mubarak had no love for Jews yet they had no desire to attack Israel so they had to go.

Others like them are next.


Obama approves Iran's Islamic monster, destablizes Egypt's secular regime to install Islamist one, see also Libya, Syria, Yemen, etc.

109 posted on 06/15/2011 9:41:50 AM PDT by PhilDragoo (Hussein: Islamo-Commie from Kenya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
War Powers Resolution

Joint Resolution

Concerning the War Powers of Congress and the President.

Resolved by the Senate and the House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SHORT TITLE

SECTION 1. This joint resolution may be cited as the "War Powers Resolution".

PURPOSE AND POLICY

SEC. 2. (a) It is the purpose of this joint resolution to fulfill the intent of the framers of the Constitution of the United States and insure that the collective judgement of both the Congress and the President will apply to the introduction of United States Armed Forces into hostilities, or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances, and to the continued use of such forces in hostilities or in such situations.

(b) Under article I, section 8, of the Constitution, it is specifically provided that the Congress shall have the power to make all laws necessary and proper for carrying into execution, not only its own powers but also all other powers vested by the Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any department or officer thereof.

(c) The constitutional powers of the President as Commander-in-Chief to introduce United States Armed Forces into hostilities, or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances, are exercised only pursuant to (1) a declaration of war, (2) specific statutory authorization, or (3) a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces.

CONSULTATION

SEC. 3. The President in every possible instance shall consult with Congress before introducing United States Armed Forces into hostilities or into situation where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances, and after every such introduction shall consult regularly with the Congress until United States Armed Forces are no longer engaged in hostilities or have been removed from such situations.

REPORTING

SEC. 4. (a) In the absence of a declaration of war, in any case in which United States Armed Forces are introduced--

(1) into hostilities or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances;

(2) into the territory, airspace or waters of a foreign nation, while equipped for combat, except for deployments which relate solely to supply, replacement, repair, or training of such forces; or

(3) in numbers which substantially enlarge United States Armed Forces equipped for combat already located in a foreign nation; the president shall submit within 48 hours to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and to the President pro tempore of the Senate a report, in writing, setting forth--

(A) the circumstances necessitating the introduction of United States Armed Forces;

(B) the constitutional and legislative authority under which such introduction took place; and

(C) the estimated scope and duration of the hostilities or involvement.

(b) The President shall provide such other information as the Congress may request in the fulfillment of its constitutional responsibilities with respect to committing the Nation to war and to the use of United States Armed Forces abroad

(c) Whenever United States Armed Forces are introduced into hostilities or into any situation described in subsection (a) of this section, the President shall, so long as such armed forces continue to be engaged in such hostilities or situation, report to the Congress periodically on the status of such hostilities or situation as well as on the scope and duration of such hostilities or situation, but in no event shall he report to the Congress less often than once every six months.

CONGRESSIONAL ACTION

SEC. 5. (a) Each report submitted pursuant to section 4(a)(1) shall be transmitted to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and to the President pro tempore of the Senate on the same calendar day. Each report so transmitted shall be referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and to the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate for appropriate action. If, when the report is transmitted, the Congress has adjourned sine die or has adjourned for any period in excess of three calendar days, the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President pro tempore of the Senate, if they deem it advisable (or if petitioned by at least 30 percent of the membership of their respective Houses) shall jointly request the President to convene Congress in order that it may consider the report and take appropriate action pursuant to this section.

(b) Within sixty calendar days after a report is submitted or is required to be submitted pursuant to section 4(a)(1), whichever is earlier, the President shall terminate any use of United States Armed Forces with respect to which such report was submitted (or required to be submitted), unless the Congress (1) has declared war or has enacted a specific authorization for such use of United States Armed Forces, (2) has extended by law such sixty-day period, or (3) is physically unable to meet as a result of an armed attack upon the United States. Such sixty-day period shall be extended for not more than an additional thirty days if the President determines and certifies to the Congress in writing that unavoidable military necessity respecting the safety of United States Armed Forces requires the continued use of such armed forces in the course of bringing about a prompt removal of such forces.

(c) Notwithstanding subsection (b), at any time that United States Armed Forces are engaged in hostilities outside the territory of the United States, its possessions and territories without a declaration of war or specific statutory authorization, such forces shall be removed by the President if the Congress so directs by concurrent resolution.

CONGRESSIONAL PRIORITY PROCEDURES FOR JOINT RESOLUTION OR BILL

SEC. 6. (a) Any joint resolution or bill introduced pursuant to section 5(b) at least thirty calendar days before the expiration of the sixty-day period specified in such section shall be referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives or the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate, as the case may be, and such committee shall report one such joint resolution or bill, together with its recommendations, not later than twenty-four calendar days before the expiration of the sixty-day period specified in such section, unless such House shall otherwise determine by the yeas and nays.

(b) Any joint resolution or bill so reported shall become the pending business of the House in question (in the case of the Senate the time for debate shall be equally divided between the proponents and the opponents), and shall be voted on within three calendar days thereafter, unless such House shall otherwise determine by yeas and nays.

(c) Such a joint resolution or bill passed by one House shall be referred to the committee of the other House named in subsection (a) and shall be reported out not later than fourteen calendar days before the expiration of the sixty-day period specified in section 5(b). The joint resolution or bill so reported shall become the pending business of the House in question and shall be voted on within three calendar days after it has been reported, unless such House shall otherwise determine by yeas and nays.

(d) In the case of any disagreement between the two Houses of Congress with respect to a joint resolution or bill passed by both Houses, conferees shall be promptly appointed and the committee of conference shall make and file a report with respect to such resolution or bill not later than four calendar days before the expiration of the sixty-day period specified in section 5(b). In the event the conferees are unable to agree within 48 hours, they shall report back to their respective Houses in disagreement. Notwithstanding any rule in either House concerning the printing of conference reports in the Record or concerning any delay in the consideration of such reports, such report shall be acted on by both Houses not later than the expiration of such sixty-day period.

CONGRESSIONAL PRIORITY PROCEDURES FOR CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

SEC. 7. (a) Any concurrent resolution introduced pursuant to section 5(b) at least thirty calendar days before the expiration of the sixty-day period specified in such section shall be referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives or the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate, as the case may be, and one such concurrent resolution shall be reported out by such committee together with its recommendations within fifteen calendar days, unless such House shall otherwise determine by the yeas and nays.

(b) Any concurrent resolution so reported shall become the pending business of the House in question (in the case of the Senate the time for debate shall be equally divided between the proponents and the opponents), and shall be voted on within three calendar days thereafter, unless such House shall otherwise determine by yeas and nays.

(c) Such a concurrent resolution passed by one House shall be referred to the committee of the other House named in subsection (a) and shall be reported out by such committee together with its recommendations within fifteen calendar days and shall thereupon become the pending business of such House and shall be voted on within three calendar days after it has been reported, unless such House shall otherwise determine by yeas and nays.

(d) In the case of any disagreement between the two Houses of Congress with respect to a concurrent resolution passed by both Houses, conferees shall be promptly appointed and the committee of conference shall make and file a report with respect to such concurrent resolution within six calendar days after the legislation is referred to the committee of conference. Notwithstanding any rule in either House concerning the printing of conference reports in the Record or concerning any delay in the consideration of such reports, such report shall be acted on by both Houses not later than six calendar days after the conference report is filed. In the event the conferees are unable to agree within 48 hours, they shall report back to their respective Houses in disagreement.

INTERPRETATION OF JOINT RESOLUTION

SEC. 8. (a) Authority to introduce United States Armed Forces into hostilities or into situations wherein involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances shall not be inferred--

(1) from any provision of law (whether or not in effect before the date of the enactment of this joint resolution), including any provision contained in any appropriation Act, unless such provision specifically authorizes the introduction of United States Armed Forces into hostilities or into such situations and stating that it is intended to constitute specific statutory authorization within the meaning of this joint resolution; or

(2) from any treaty heretofore or hereafter ratified unless such treaty is implemented by legislation specifically authorizing the introduction of United States Armed Forces into hostilities or into such situations and stating that it is intended to constitute specific statutory authorization within the meaning of this joint resolution.

(b) Nothing in this joint resolution shall be construed to require any further specific statutory authorization to permit members of United States Armed Forces to participate jointly with members of the armed forces of one or more foreign countries in the headquarters operations of high-level military commands which were established prior to the date of enactment of this joint resolution and pursuant to the United Nations Charter or any treaty ratified by the United States prior to such date.

(c) For purposes of this joint resolution, the term "introduction of United States Armed Forces" includes the assignment of member of such armed forces to command, coordinate, participate in the movement of, or accompany the regular or irregular military forces of any foreign country or government when such military forces are engaged, or there exists an imminent threat that such forces will become engaged, in hostilities.

(d) Nothing in this joint resolution--

(1) is intended to alter the constitutional authority of the Congress or of the President, or the provision of existing treaties; or

(2) shall be construed as granting any authority to the President with respect to the introduction of United States Armed Forces into hostilities or into situations wherein involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances which authority he would not have had in the absence of this joint resolution.

SEPARABILITY CLAUSE

SEC. 9. If any provision of this joint resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the joint resolution and the application of such provision to any other person or circumstance shall not be affected thereby.

EFFECTIVE DATE

SEC. 10. This joint resolution shall take effect on the date of its enactment. CARL ALBERT
Speaker of the House of Representatives.

JAMES O. EASTLAND
President of the Senate pro tempore.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, U.S.,

November 7, 1973.

The House of Representatives having proceeded to reconsider the resolution (H. J. Res 542) entitled "Joint resolution concerning the war powers of Congress and the President", returned by the President of the United States with his objections, to the House of Representatives, in which it originated, it was

Resolved, That the said resolution pass, two-thirds of the House of Representatives agreeing to pass the same. Attest:
W. PAT JENNINGS
Clerk.

I certify that this Joint Resolution originated in the House of Representatives. W. PAT JENNINGS
Clerk.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

November 7, 1973

The Senate having proceeded to reconsider the joint resolution (H. J. Res. 542) entitled "Joint resolution concerning the war powers of Congress and the President", returned by the President of the United States with his objections to the House of Representatives, in which it originate, it was

Resolved, That the said joint resolution pass, two-thirds of the Senators present having voted in the affirmative. Attest:
FRANCIS R. VALEO
Secretary.

110 posted on 06/15/2011 9:45:04 AM PDT by Pan_Yan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Maybe to a weasel. Care to tell me what kept 0jugears from consulting with Congress first? What was the big national security or national interest that couldn’t wait?


111 posted on 06/15/2011 4:31:17 PM PDT by TigersEye (Who crashed the markets on 9/15/08 and why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: DrewsMum
I remember the WH put some weak story about talking to someone after they started getting flak. The Pubbies control the House so how is their outrage fake when they are left out of a decision to go to war? How is having tea and crumpets with a couple of select Congressmen behind closed doors equivalent to the idea of "consulting Congress" to you? I can't believe you think that was the intent of the law.
112 posted on 06/15/2011 4:34:50 PM PDT by TigersEye (Who crashed the markets on 9/15/08 and why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Obamugabe’s tee time......


113 posted on 06/15/2011 6:25:29 PM PDT by Red Badger (Nothing is a 'right' if someone has to give it to you................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

LOL


114 posted on 06/15/2011 7:37:37 PM PDT by TigersEye (Who crashed the markets on 9/15/08 and why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Drill Thrawl

Bonehead to drift off into irrelevance


He’s already irrelevant, he just hasn’t realized it yet.

Ha!

“Callahan, you’re about to become extinct.”

(Hal Holbrook, Lt. Briggs, Magnum Force)


115 posted on 06/15/2011 7:59:17 PM PDT by PaleoBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Bruce Campbells Chin
Before mocking Boehner, perhaps people should consider that the House just passed a bill calling for all funds to be cut off for any military operation that is not in compliance with the War Powers Act.

Ok, I'll wait. And then, what will you say when nothing is done?

116 posted on 06/17/2011 8:14:16 PM PDT by GregoryFul (Obama - Jim Jones redux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
And Bohner will do nothing.
117 posted on 06/18/2011 1:55:26 AM PDT by fortheDeclaration (When the wicked beareth rule, the people mourn (Pr.29:2))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bruce Campbells Chin
You want to place bets on seeing the bill put into effect?

It is a bluff, no funds will be denied for military operations by a GOP Congress.

Only the Democrats do that to Republican Presidents.

118 posted on 06/18/2011 1:58:04 AM PDT by fortheDeclaration (When the wicked beareth rule, the people mourn (Pr.29:2))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-118 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson