Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Putnam County man mauled by pit bulls dies (Florida)
St. Augustine Record ^ | June 16, 2011 | swampsniper

Posted on 06/16/2011 2:31:39 AM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER

A Putnam County man mauled by two pit bulls last week died late Wednesday afternoon after being taken off life support. Roy McSweeney, 74, suffered brain damage from severe blood loss that occurred when the dogs severed one arm, partially removed the other and attacked his face, said Jennifer Biewend, his family's attorney. Capt. Johnny Greenwood of the Sheriff's Office said he was pronounced dead at 4:18 p.m.

(Excerpt) Read more at staugustine.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: death; fleshwound; mauling; mcsweeney; pitbull; roymcsweeney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last
To: Havisham

All of my loved ones are proud carriers of respectable firearms. I’ve drawn on a stray before, and I would never hesitate to do it again.

Any animal is capable of terror. It just requires the right confluence of factors.


41 posted on 06/16/2011 9:50:38 AM PDT by rarestia (It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Justa

You are incorrect.

The original Staff was created *long* before WWI as a drover dog, capable of catching and holding potentially dangerous bulls to save the drover’s life, if need be.

They were also used as “catch dogs” for swine.

The sexually repressed and infinitely twisted Victorians then used them for ‘blood sports’ such as bull baiting.

They also used many varieties of terriers for mass ‘rat pit fighting’ wagers.

The sickos would bet on anything bloody and cruel.

As far as WWI goes,

“They make excellent companions for humans. The government employed pitbulls for WWI and WWII, Sgt. Stubby was 26th in the Yankee division in France. He helped apprehend a German spy and was credited with saving lives of several soldiers in 1917. Pitbulls were extremely valuable on the battle field, carrying messages back and forth.”

Please get your facts straight.

“Ignorance and aggression against the innocent must be punished.”

Et tu, Brute’?


42 posted on 06/16/2011 9:54:18 AM PDT by Salamander (I wear my sunglasses at night.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: allmendream

And is she being held criminally libel for it or will the mob merely satisfy themselves with the death of the dogs?


43 posted on 06/16/2011 9:57:08 AM PDT by Salamander (I wear my sunglasses at night.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Salamander
She, the owner of the property, and Animal Control should all be liable.

As far as I can see the woman committed manslaughter just as much as if she set up an anvil to drop on his head if he walked into his own front yard.

Do you think the dogs shouldn't be put to death?

44 posted on 06/16/2011 10:03:30 AM PDT by allmendream (Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: SquarePants

I’m sure you keep that Pit Bull for it’s cuddliness toward strangers. Do you read? Your baby is not safe around a Pit Bull. I’ve noticed there are parents that get a kick out of placing their offspring in dangerous scenarios to see what will happen, ‘rescue’ them at the last second, and feel like heroes afterwards. The children, if they survive, will repeat this behavior with their own kids, or someone else’s unlucky enough to be in their care, in order to relive those crazy times with dad. It’s all in the diagnostic manual.


45 posted on 06/16/2011 10:07:38 AM PDT by Havisham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Salamander

Poor or no training in every case...unless you really want to sell the notion that triggers pull themselves.


46 posted on 06/16/2011 10:11:31 AM PDT by wtc911 ("How you gonna get down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: rarestia

What a dumb answer. Kids can’t carry guns for protection.


47 posted on 06/16/2011 10:15:56 AM PDT by Havisham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Havisham

I don’t have kids, sir. Non-sequitur.


48 posted on 06/16/2011 10:16:50 AM PDT by rarestia (It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Havisham
I tend to be wary of these bully breeds.

Certain kinds of owners should never ever own such dogs. But I do tend to see a problem becoming more and more evident lately...many of the 'shelter dogs' are turning up bully/mixes. It does make me uncomfortable for perhaps unknowing or ill-informed folks may be taking on some of these dogs.

But, many dogs can be just as unpredictable too. There are biters and then there are attackers.

And then there is this: The Dogs are Alright

49 posted on 06/16/2011 10:23:35 AM PDT by EBH ( Whether you eat your bread or see it vanish into a looter's stomach, is an absolute.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Salamander
You seriously want to ban guns?

If that is ever done, do you know who will still be armed?

I made a great sign for the door to Mr Ditter’s gun room.

{OWNER IS UNARMED PLEASE DO NOT ROB OR HURT HIM}

50 posted on 06/16/2011 10:24:54 AM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Salamander
Ahem...no not the "Lakeview guy." Please refrain from jumping to conclusions. See: Dog Story
51 posted on 06/16/2011 10:30:23 AM PDT by PowderMonkey (WILL WORK FOR AMMO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: allmendream

That depends.

Suppose I were raised by irresponsible idiots, imparted no sense of appropriate behavior, brutalized and beaten throughout my childhood, left to roam the alleys terrorizing people at will with no repercussions and later went on to attack and kill someone, even if it wasn’t my ~conscious intent~ to do so; I just happened to be ‘strong enough’ to cause their death?

Oh...but I’m a *human*, you say and should “know better” therefore I should be held solely liable for my actions, correct?

This is a case of a _dumb animal_ suffering the consequences of an _even dumber animal_ who *should* have been the “smart one”.

FYI, if one my dogs gravely injured or even killed someone and they locked *me* up and gave the dog to a -better- owner, I wouldn’t have the gall to utter one peep in my defense or in outrage of the “unfairness of it all”.

What my dogs do or are _begins and ends_ with -me-.

Just like their ‘intellectual equivalent’ of a 3 year old child, I’m a _wholly responsible_ for what they do.

The woman should get every charge they can make up laid against her.

Hopefully, everything she owns now or will ever own will go to his survivors.

If strict, non-negotiable recompense/jail time laws like that were enforced, just how long do you think the thugs would keep letting their untrained dogs run amok?

Money [and prison time] talks and it’s the only language some fools understand.


52 posted on 06/16/2011 11:11:40 AM PDT by Salamander (I wear my sunglasses at night.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Salamander

“Ignorance and aggression against the innocent must be punished.”

Et tu, Brute’?”

What are you talking about, the dog is innocent? The dog killed an elderly man. And what is this animals-before-people PETA crap?

I’m not a nanny-stater but the days of people shooting someone’s dog for harmful infraction are gone.

These dogs have been bred for attack for centuries. In my town every socially insecure loser with an IQ below 100 has one because they’re incapable of articulating and defending themselves using their language and mental skills.

Please, show us the news stories of Pit Bulls saving lives as opposed to mounting evidence against all the MORON owners who are incapable and unwilling to control these attack dogs? Must we license owners on proper training, care and handling of these dogs? Is the dog’s behavior that inherently dangerous?

Automobiles and guns don’t kill people on their own yet both are regulated. But a potentially deadly animal is loose in a neighborhood and there are no restriction?

Lemme guess, you’re a pit owner, never use a leash and walk it on other peoples’ lawns, around their kids, etc because ~he’s-never-done-anything-to-you~ ?

Yeah, maybe it is the owners but it’s a lot simpler to regulate their access to dangerous equipment than to elevate their consideration and responsibility in society.


53 posted on 06/16/2011 11:14:39 AM PDT by Justa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: wtc911

“Poor or no training in every case”

Oh, pardon me.

I had no idea you intimately knew everyone in my area.

Yes, dear child, even seasoned, expert hunters can mess up...or have the ‘unexpected’ happen.

That’s why it’s called an “accident”.


54 posted on 06/16/2011 11:15:13 AM PDT by Salamander (I wear my sunglasses at night.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Salamander
I think dogs who kill people should be put down. That is one of the reasons why they are dogs not wolves - because for thousands of years any dog that killed people (that they were not otherwise supposed to kill) were generally killed themselves without compunction.

Innocence or culpability means little to me from an animal. It is not a worthwhile investment of time or energy, in my mind. Dog rehabilitators think differently - but I think that even they can find a more rehabitatateable dog than ones that have killed a human being.

Yes, until owners are held liable, and the property owner who allowed this woman to maintain this danger on his property - and until Animal Control takes dangerous dogs seriously and actually follows their policy on dangerous dogs running loose - this will continue to happen.

Look at my 4 criteria again. You see this in almost every dog attack involving death or serious maiming.

1. Large and/or aggressive breed of dog.
2. Running loose, often >1 running loose.
3. Previous acts of aggression towards humans.
4. Unrealistic expectation of passivity from owner, often despite #3.

55 posted on 06/16/2011 11:20:10 AM PDT by allmendream (Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Ditter

Not just guns.

Swimming pools, hot dogs, 5 gallon buckets, ATVs, marbles, all coins and all objects that will fit through a toilet paper tube, popcorn, peanuts, plastic bags, swing sets, SUVs, and mothers, who, all by themselves, are responsible for killing more kids per year than any other cause.

Oh, hell.

Just ban everything and keep your kids in a sterile bubble.


56 posted on 06/16/2011 11:20:21 AM PDT by Salamander (I wear my sunglasses at night.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: caver

Not a Monty Python fan, I see...


57 posted on 06/16/2011 11:20:32 AM PDT by Ready4Freddy (I fight gangs for local charities and stuff.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: PowderMonkey

Huh.

This is interesting:

“An affidavit for a search warrant filed in Spotsylvania Circuit Court states that the room was in disarray and there was a wooden baseball bat on a sofa near the body.

Blood was on the floor, on several pieces of furniture and on the walls, court records state.”

Is anyone going to bother testing the blood to see ~what~ it came from?

The baseball bat is a...curious thing.


58 posted on 06/16/2011 11:24:03 AM PDT by Salamander (I wear my sunglasses at night.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: allmendream

The whole issue literally revolves around #4.


59 posted on 06/16/2011 11:26:09 AM PDT by Salamander (I wear my sunglasses at night.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Ready4Freddy

I got it but it was rather an ill-timed jape.


60 posted on 06/16/2011 11:27:02 AM PDT by Salamander (I wear my sunglasses at night.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson