Note the word “gatekeepers.” Data that is collected by publicly-paid researchers or officials should NOT require a “gatekeeper.” The data should be readily available for all, for verification, analysis, and use. It is not the private property of the person or agency collecting the data.
That, my friends, is the real problem.
Data that is collected by publicly-paid researchers or officials should NOT require a “gatekeeper.”
///
agreed! and why do they fight FOIA so hard, like Mann is doing, if their “science” is so “settled” ?
...and along with gatekeepers, they are consolidating of data into fewer and fewer places. like measuring atmospheric CO2 can be done anywhere. yet the ONLY place in the world ever mentioned now, is Mauna Loa. (and before that, they only use dubious ice cores).
and there is NO backup site, for confirming.
if even ONE CO2 reading from last century is higher than now, the entire Hoax is revealed. yet there are, and some were made by Nobel Prize winners in Chemistry:
page 5 and 9, show overall CO2:
180 Years accurate CO2 - Gasanalysis of Air
by Chemical Methods (Short version)
http://www.anenglishmanscastle.com/180_years_accurate_Co2_Chemical_Methods.pdf
and this one is a good sample of the fraud,
that the gatekeepers you mention, hide:
http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2010/11/04/hiding-the-decline-in-washington-dc/