Posted on 06/19/2011 1:02:01 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
Very interesting tidbit.
Politicheck belongs to Times Publishing Co. They also have a “journalist” school which is churning out journolist assistants. I think it’s called Poytner or something similar.
What I get from Perry. Here’s the picture I have.
Bilderberg loves Perry because he signed an executive order forcing girls to get vaccinations for STD’s. Bilderberg loves candidates with that dictatorial spirit, and loves that he’d do it to enrich big pharma. Add in big ol highway, the trans Texas corridor, owned by foreigners, and it’s globalist win win all around for Bilderberg.
I’d almost go as far as to say sinister for Perry. Might be worse than Romney, not on the known liberal scale, but on the sinister globalist NWO scale. Romney is pushing the Mormon agenda, on top of pure Big Government Liberal Republicanism, but Perry seems to have the globalist playbook and would move to implement NWO goals.
From Post #32: Just because obamacare can be waived makes it no less a mandate. What would have been the difference?
Having an optout makes it no less a mandate. Most people would not go to the trouble of seeking an optout because it is a hassle and believe it or not, there are still people who think the government knows best. That might be more of an indictment of parents, but the government should not be in the position of forcing parents to make uinformed choices about the health of their children. The fact remains that had he succeeded and the dangers of this vaccine had come to light AFTER these children had ben forced to submit to these shots, it would have been perry on the hook, not the parents who trusted him to do the right thing.
And I STILL wonder why perry would have done such a thing when so little was known about it. It never seemed quite right from the gitgo.
With all due respect cw, that argument about illegal is the very same one used by Clinton, Weiner etc and it’s a last resort to cover up rot.
It may not have been ‘illegal’ but, the appearance of impropriety is there (if the assertion is true) also it’s a conflict of interest. Elected officials have an obligation and responsibility to avoid both.
“But, could you please educate me on which politician deserves your vote based on the criteria you set regarding “backpedaling”?”
That he would try to order young girls and parents to do something that would be, in my opinion, very risky to their health tells me everything I need to know about him. It is the classical I-Know-Best mindset of a ruler.
Now that we wants the highest Rulership in the land he realizes that bullying families probably wasn’t the best idea.
If he would order girls to take a risky drug, then what other fun would he have with the Presidential executive order pen?
Money.
“I don’t, but I know my nephew, who was so severely damaged by a “mandated” DPT shot that at the age of 27, he functions at a 2 year old level.
Nobody’s doing that to my children.”
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
This needs repeating! Any politician who would force this on little girls cannot be trusted.
There was also nothing illegal in Massachusetts adopting a health-insurance mandate either.
It just proves that neiter governor is a conservative.
I have a “conscientious objection” to nominating or electing Rick Perry to the POTUS for “philosophical or religious reasons” and I don’t need an “affidavit form”.
Is the Mass Insurance an opt-out one like the vaccine?
I am curious. Had this been attempted by a democrat governor in any state in the country, how would you feel about it then?
This was a conscious decision by perry. He only backed down because he had a HUGE fight on his hands, not for any other reason. But suppose he hadn’t? Suppose he was a dem in a state controlled by dems and this had gone into effect. Suppose you had a nine year old daughter. How would you defend it?
Anyone who so freely twists facts should be challenged "Pastor Brooks".
You are making up fairy tales.
How can I answer all those, “what ifs?”
Yup. You can apply for a waiver....just like you had to plead with Texas in order to "opt-out".
Just admit that what Perry did on this single issue was dangerous and not conservative.
Sounds an awful lot like this other dude I know who lives in TX and was Prez once upon a time. Maybe its true that everything is bigger in Texas.
Tricky, tricky. Nah. you can’t opt out of romneycare, BUT, you don’t need to because if you *can’t afford it,* the STATE, meaning the TAXPAYERS, *subsidize* it for you. Gee. How swell is that?
With all due respect ow, Rick Perry isn't Bill Clinton or Rep Weiner. To suggest a comparison is silly.
Would Sarah Palin endorse Clinton or Weiner for office?
You were checkmated but nice try.
But someone will still foot the bill and YOU still are in the program.
NOT the same.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.