Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Reps. Frank and Paul: Let states legalize pot
Seattle Post Intelligencer ^ | June 22, 2011 | Joel Connelly

Posted on 06/22/2011 1:23:14 PM PDT by Second Amendment First

A bipartisan team of Reps. Barney Frank, D-Mass., and Ron Paul, R-Texas, will introduce federal legislation that would permit states to legalize, regulate, tax and control marijuana without federal interference.

The legislation will be unveiled Thursday by Frank, an outspoken liberal Democrat, and the libertarian Paul, who is running for the 2012 Republican presidential nomination.

The bill would limit the U.S. government role in marijuana enforcement to interdiction of cross-border or inter-state smuggling. Citizens would be able to legally grow, use or sell cannabis in states which have legalized the forbidden weed.

The legislation is the first bill to be introduced in Congress that would end federal marijuana prohibition.

In a preview of the legislation, the Marijuana Policy Project noted that last week marked the 40th Anniversary of when President Nixon declared that the federal government was at war with marijuana and other drugs.

Nixon had rejected recommendations by a presidential panel that the country move toward decriminalization and an education and treatment-based drug policy.

(Excerpt) Read more at blog.seattlepi.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 10a; 10thamendment; barneyfrank; bongbrigade; corruption; gethigh; liberalism; libertarian; libertarianism; moralabsolutes; prodope; psychosis; ronpaul; slavery; surrender; wod
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-313 next last
Probably the only thing on which I would agree with Barney Frank.

It's long past time to end the war on drugs. Over a trillion dollars spent on it and what have we gained: militarized police forces, no knock warrants, drug gangs and cartels, corruption of law enforcement, mothers arrested for buying too much cold medicine, citizens and their dogs shot, patients in pain because of doctor intimidation. And the drugs are more readily available than ever.

If people want to harm themselves the government cannot and should not interfere. It's called freedom.

1 posted on 06/22/2011 1:23:20 PM PDT by Second Amendment First
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

Least of our worries. Big red herring. Early for red herring season. One has to wonder why.


2 posted on 06/22/2011 1:24:49 PM PDT by Psalm 144 (We are not governed. We are occupied.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First
Then the states can tax it like cigarettes, a windfall.
3 posted on 06/22/2011 1:25:55 PM PDT by boomop1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

I can’t see this ever being approved by our crowned heads of state.


4 posted on 06/22/2011 1:27:55 PM PDT by GSWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boomop1
Then the states can tax it like cigarettes, a windfall.

So give politicians more cash? Why does it even have to be taxed?

5 posted on 06/22/2011 1:27:57 PM PDT by frogjerk (Liberalism: The ideology of envy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First
Oh Noes! This is a direct threat to all the Nanny Statists.

Cannot allow people to make decisions for themselves! Cant have that.

6 posted on 06/22/2011 1:28:11 PM PDT by corkoman (Steadfast and Loyal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First
Who cares about smoking it... Will it be legal to grow for fiber and biomass? Lots more money there.

/johnny

7 posted on 06/22/2011 1:28:25 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

As a bonus, if Obama opposes this - which he probably will - he pisses off a good chunk of his base.


8 posted on 06/22/2011 1:28:57 PM PDT by I Shall Endure
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 144

I agree 144! While I’m on the fence on the premise, this would re-energize Obama’s base in ways we can’t consider right now. This should be stopped for the charade it is: getting Obama back in the WH.


9 posted on 06/22/2011 1:28:59 PM PDT by rarestia (It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

One of the biggest problems we have is dope-heads who vote. Guess who they vote for.

I say, issue a federal “pot permit”. If you have the pot permit, you can keep your pot. But you cannot vote in any election.

Voting is something that pot-heads should not be allowed to do. No more stoner-vote. It has done enough damage already.


10 posted on 06/22/2011 1:29:24 PM PDT by advance_copy (Stand for life or nothing at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First
Bawney Fwank is a Libertarian?
 
 
 
Makes Sense!


11 posted on 06/22/2011 1:29:55 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd (I'm a Birther - And a Deather)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First
Let the states? Why would the states need permission from the Feds to institute laws on an issue that the Feds have no authority to make laws about in the first place?

So much for Ron Paul's Federalist views of the Constitution. He's showing himself a fraud on that with this move.

12 posted on 06/22/2011 1:30:00 PM PDT by TigersEye (Who crashed the markets on 9/15/08 and why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boomop1
Then the states can tax it like cigarettes, a windfall.

I have a better idea. What if states learn self-control and spend less. That would be the ULTIMATE windfall.

13 posted on 06/22/2011 1:30:16 PM PDT by ElkGroveDan (My tagline is in the shop.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

While they are at it, free all the non-violent prisoners who haven’t committed any crimes other than their personal drug use, especially if the drug was Marijuana.


14 posted on 06/22/2011 1:31:02 PM PDT by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

The States shouldn’t need the federal government’s permission to do this. They never granted the federal government the authority to control it in the first place.


15 posted on 06/22/2011 1:31:10 PM PDT by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: advance_copy

Should alcoholics be prohibited from voting?


16 posted on 06/22/2011 1:31:26 PM PDT by Second Amendment First ("Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not..." - Thomas Jefferson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

 
RON: Wanna smoke some dope?
 
BAWNEY: And then we fool awound?


17 posted on 06/22/2011 1:32:55 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd (I'm a Birther - And a Deather)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: boomop1
Then the states can tax it like cigarettes, a windfall.

Hellava lot safer than alcohol.

18 posted on 06/22/2011 1:33:46 PM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

I used to think that legalizing drugs was a no brainer - just as you stated that the war on drugs has been a dismal FAILURE! I mean, it has only been “slightly” less effective than the original prohibition amendment! /sarc

However, when Barney Frank thinks it is a good idea, I have to seriously consider that I am mistaken in my thought process. Maybe this is Frank’s “a stopped watch is correct twice a day” moment!


19 posted on 06/22/2011 1:34:04 PM PDT by ExTxMarine (PRAYER: It's the only HOPE for real CHANGE in America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

I’m all for letting the states do as they wish but I don’t buy the utopian view of the results of marijuana legalization. Others will be harmed and there will be a whole boatload of new laws to follow.


20 posted on 06/22/2011 1:34:18 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-313 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson