Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New York Gay Marriage Bill Needs Only One More GOP Nod For It To Pass
LA Times ^ | June 24, 2011 | Andrew Malcolm

Posted on 06/24/2011 3:20:14 PM PDT by lbryce

The New York gay marriage bill introduced by Democratic Gov. Andrew Cuomo needs only one more yea vote from a Republican senator to pass. If that vote materializes, New York would become the sixth and most populous state to allow same-sex marriage.

President Obama received mixed reviews after speaking Thursday night to supporters of the bill at a Democratic fundraiser in New York City. More than 600 gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) people paid $1,250 each to attend the gala.

The president's critics argue that although he said he supports equal rights for gays and lesbians, he won't come right out and support same-sex marriage.

LZ Granderson, an openly gay journalist for ESPN and CNN, said he wanted to be mad at Obama (like some of those who heckled the president during his speech), but ultimately he understood that now was not the time for the president to publicly support the redefinition of marriage.

Granderson wrote on CNN that "as inspiring as it would have been to hear the president say he supports marriage equality, Thursday night simply was not the right time."

"And it won't be tomorrow, or even next week," he continued. "That's not a defeatist attitude wrapped in dogmatism, but rather the depressing voice of pragmatism."

Daily Beast writer Nancy Goldstein was less forgiving in her piece Friday that carried the headline "Obama’s Gay Marriage Wimp-Out" and concluded: "If Thursday night’s performance is any indication, this president, left to his own devices and with a pocketful of LGBT checks, does not appear to share our sense of urgency."

(Excerpt) Read more at latimesblogs.latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abomination; cuomo; depravity; fdrq; gay; gayrights; homosexualagenda; legalperversion; ny
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: lbryce

It just went to the floor for a vote:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2739629/posts

Regards,


21 posted on 06/24/2011 5:47:01 PM PDT by VermiciousKnid (Sic narro nos totus!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedomwarrior998
It takes a while to buy off people in back room deals. If the vote is going to the floor, it is going to pass. The fix is in.

That's a given. But you'd think that even in New York there would be some with principle. I wonder what bargaining chips are being used?

22 posted on 06/24/2011 5:48:34 PM PDT by fwdude (Prosser wins, Goonions lose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

Principle usually goes out the window when you become a legislator. As for the bargaining chips... Money, votes on other bills, pet projects to be passed. I hear a big one is redistricting. Cuomo threatened the GOP Senate to block any redistricting that they passed and let the liberal courts draw the maps instead. This would effectively ensure Democrat control of the Senate after the elections. The GOP caved on it.


23 posted on 06/24/2011 6:00:26 PM PDT by freedomwarrior998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Well, that is just fabulous!


24 posted on 06/24/2011 7:40:23 PM PDT by crusty old prospector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

We’re told that gays are only 2 to 4 % of the population. How many of that small percentage want to get married?

I’m not in favor of the bill, but I can’t believe it will have that much of an impact on society in general.


25 posted on 06/24/2011 7:55:30 PM PDT by altura ( Palin/Ryan---or Palin/anybody (removed Cain because of Bush bashing.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: altura
You ever hear that the squeaky wheel gets the grease?
In the same way that they complain that 1% of the population controls 40% of the money, 2% of the population can make 80% of the trouble.
26 posted on 06/24/2011 8:48:20 PM PDT by Tanniker Smith (I didn't know she was a liberal when I married her.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Sun
...but yet the majority of Black people voted AGAINST same-sex “marriage” in CA.

Yeah, well these very same Black people consistently vote for politicians who let this happen. They share in the blame as far as I am concerned.

27 posted on 06/25/2011 4:02:59 AM PDT by bella1 (As it was in the days of Lot....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Tanniker Smith

That’s what I keep telling my husband about smokers. Though declining hugely, they still represent 20 plus percent of the population.

But do they agitate? Do they form protest groups? Do they fight at all?

No, they just sit around and smoke and maybe have a couple of martinis ....


28 posted on 06/25/2011 11:05:35 AM PDT by altura ( Palin/Ryan---or Palin/anybody (removed Cain because of Bush bashing.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: bella1

...but yet the majority of Black people voted AGAINST same-sex “marriage” in CA.

“Yeah, well these very same Black people consistently vote for politicians who let this happen. They share in the blame as far as I am concerned.”

You miss the point I was trying to make which is that the left canNOT play the race card on this issue, comparing homosexual “marriage” with interracial marriage, because the majrotity of Blacks are against it, too.

The fact that the majority Blacks vote poorly is true, but that’s another thread.

It is getting to be a mantra from the gay AGENDA people that being against gay so-called marriage is a racial issue, which it is not.

I’m even seeing it after anti-gay “marriage” letters to the editor on the newspaper blogs.


29 posted on 06/25/2011 10:00:13 PM PDT by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Puppage

[[Even so, some judge would overturn it any way]]

Some gay judge- just likwe hwat happened in californication- who then turned aroyund and said his perverse lifestyle had nothign to do with his descision- yeah, suuuuure it didn’t


30 posted on 06/27/2011 9:05:33 PM PDT by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson