To: Lakeshark
I agree. To a certain extent, Palin is immune to the depredations of the press. They can complain and criticize her (or course) but we know they have nothing substantive to say and there are no surprises that will suddenly appear.
Sarah is far and away my first choice. I'm not even sure I have a second choice at this point.
4 posted on
06/25/2011 6:14:33 AM PDT by
ClearCase_guy
(The USSR spent itself into bankruptcy and collapsed -- and aren't we on the same path now?)
To: ClearCase_guy
To: ClearCase_guy
show me someone else that has gone after pork not only in the opposing party but their party as well, and i’ll consider them
7 posted on
06/25/2011 6:19:40 AM PDT by
sten
(fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
To: ClearCase_guy
If she runs, she has the capacity and courage to run against the media, as well as the moral stature with how they have covered her in the past.
If she brings a campaign to the people of the USA that goes over the heads of the media, the ground will shift big time and she will have the opportunity to demonstrate just how wrong they have been.
There may not be a more important thing to do than bring down the media in the eyes of the American people.
9 posted on
06/25/2011 6:21:32 AM PDT by
Lakeshark
(Thank a member of the US armed forces for their sacrifice)
To: ClearCase_guy
“Sarah is far and away my first choice. I’m not even sure I have a second choice at this point. “
Well said. I’d follow her into Hell if she’d lead.
43 posted on
06/25/2011 8:43:52 AM PDT by
dagogo redux
(A whiff of primitive spirits in the air, harbingers of an impending descent into the feral.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson