Posted on 06/26/2011 6:20:11 AM PDT by rhema
The trick is to take the cash, then plant the whole place to pot. That way a lot of heads explode, particularly around here. ;’)
And you’re going green at the same time! It’s a win win win!
Not if you called him up and asked him first. See if he’s really required to plow under his unsold crop in order to receive his subsidy.
I am not willing to risk failure of my car.
My concern is that if the subsidies are removed but the mandate to use 10% Ethanol remains it would only result in a rise in fuel prices. It sounds like a good old fashioned shafting of the people and right out of the liberal play book. Keep fuel prices artificially high, collect the extra tax money that occurs as a result of the higher prices all along pushing for things like high speed trains, electric cars and instigating anger against the gas companies. It’s like a opera.
Nope, but Ron Paul is...
Maybe you could make a you tube video of the farmer plowing under produce and post it to FR.
Though alot of the claims on this board about ethanol are overblown, I still am not a fan of ethanol as the added-value ag solution for farmers. We have locked ourselves into a paradigm that in my opinion amounts to putting our eggs into one added-value basket.
There are technologies, in their infancy but being developed, that extract other products from farm products, not only corn, but other grains. Oil, protein, pharmaceuticals, neutraceuticals, things that are not tied to the fuel market, have high value and diversify both the end product market but also the crops a farmer can grow profitably. Not all land is suited best for corn.
The model we need to follow is the reverse of what we have with ethanol. We need to extract all but the carbohydrates up front, then either ferment those to whatever is most profitable, or sell them to whatever industry can use them in their process. The result would be a far more efficient, valuable process, one that is also free market without subsidies or mandates.
We need to do this now. The ethanol industry has become enough of a force that it now has a pull on prices, and I’m afraid that will risk stomping out other viable technologies if ethanol makes corn too expensive because of high fuel prices. Worse, I’m worried about a bust if oil crashes.
Nor do I want to go back to shipping it overseas on a barge, or going back to the cheap meat paradigm that our original farm policy is structured for, and which is the ulterior motive of many on this board when they rail against ethanol. Subsidy is subsidy. Let’s give the farmer true freedom to farm by getting rid of all of it.
Context is everything. He might be using those crops as ‘green manure’, something the video probably wouldn’t show.
Courage? you have to be kidding. TPaw is a weak man. Courage would be standing in Iowa stating "Ethanol subsidies and the mandates for ethanol should immediately end." Ethanol is evil and a cancer on Capitalism.
Sounds like it all amounts to “green manure” but you don’t grow squash, pumpkins or cabbage INTENTIONALLY as green manure. That wouldn’t make much sense.
You pay your money you take your chance, my statement stands.
I have spoken to IOWANS who have enough common sense to recognize that government subsidies for ethanol just aren’t right!
I’m disappointed this article doesn’t mention the Hundreds of Billion dollars spent to subsidize Big Oil! Those subsidies should be eliminated as well.
If someone knows the cost in real dollars to provide a U.S. Millitary escort thru foreign seas for oil tankers headed to the U.S., I hope they will post it. I know it’s huge,, just don’t have the accurate figure.
The author of this piece, Jason Lewis, introduced Bachmann at a big event tonight.
depends on when you ask him.
http://news.minnesota.publicradio.org/features/2005/09/26_mccalluml_ethanol/
Pawlenty pumps ethanol
by Laura McCallum, Minnesota Public Radio
September 26, 2005
Governor Tim Pawlenty addresses the Governors’ Ethanol Coalition in St Paul. (MPR photo/Laura McCallum)
Governor Pawlenty is challenging other states to boost their ethanol consumption. He told a meeting of the Governors’ Ethanol Coalition that the corn-based fuel will reduce the nation’s dependence on foreign oil. The group consists of 31 states and five countries that support ethanol. But unlike Minnesota, few of them mandate ethanol use.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.