Posted on 06/28/2011 9:27:04 AM PDT by BulletBobCo
With the Wisconsin Supreme Court devolving into a storyline only Vince McMahon could love, rumors are still swirling about what actually happened when two justices engaged in a physical confrontation behind closed doors on June 13. Justice Ann Walsh Bradley claims Justice David Prosser “choked” her. Prosser denies he choked Bradley, and claims she initiated physical contact. In the past two days, multiple sources with first-hand knowledge of the incident have been able to provide more details as to what exactly happened behind closed chamber doors.
The week before the legislature was set to re-pass the collective-bargaining provision, three of the four conservative justices were ready to issue a ruling reinstating the union law as originally passed. Prosser, on the other hand, wanted to wait longer, to avoid the appearance that the court was rushing their decision through. Prosser thought he had an agreement with liberal Chief Justice Shirley Abrahamson to delay release of the opinion until Tuesday of the following week.
As Monday arrived, there was no word from Abrahamson on whether the decision would be issued the next day. At 5:30 p.m., Prosser and the other conservative justices marched around the chambers, looking for Abrahamson, who was found in Justice Bradley’s office. Prosser stood outside Bradley’s door, talking to the justices in Bradley’s office. The discussion got heated, with Prosser expressing his lack of faith in Abrahamson’s ability to lead the Court.
According to one witness, Bradley charged toward Prosser, shaking her clenched fist in his face. Another source says they were “literally nose to nose.” Prosser then put his hands up to push her away. As one source pointed out, if a man wants to push a woman who is facing him, he wouldn’t push her in the chest (unless he wants to face an entirely different criminal charge). Consequently, Prosser put his hands on Bradley’s shoulders to push her away, and in doing so, made contact with her neck.
At that moment, another justice approached Bradley from behind and pulled her away from Prosser, saying, “Stop it, Ann, this isn’t like you.” Bradley then shouted, “I was choked!” Another justice present replied, “You were not choked.” In a statement following the incident, Bradley maintained Prosser “put his hands around my neck in anger in a chokehold.”
On Monday night, Bradley called Capitol Police Chief Charles Tubbs to talk to him about the incident. On the morning of Wednesday, June 15, Tubbs joined the justices in a closed-door meeting, where he discussed “issues relating to workplace violence.”
During the meeting, Chief Justice Abrahamson actually reenacted the incident on Chief Tubbs — no doubt an amusing sight, as the diminutive Abrahamson mimicked choking the tall, portly police chief. During her demonstration, Abrahamson emphasized that Prosser had exerted “pressure” on Bradley’s throat.
“There was no pressure,” interrupted the justice who had initially broken up the incident between Bradley and Prosser. “That’s only because you broke us apart,” shot back Bradley. This exchange led several meeting attendees to believe Bradley was making up the charge, as they took her rejoinder as an admission that there was no pressure applied to her neck.
During the Wednesday meeting, Bradley urged the justices present to take a vote on whether Prosser should be forced into anger-management counseling. The threat was implicit — if they didn’t vote her way, she would be forced to “take the next step” against Prosser, which they took to mean filing a restraining order against him. The other justices balked, wondering whether they even had the authority to order Prosser into any type of counseling. Some thought it would be “demeaning” to Prosser to have to go to counseling when he had done nothing wrong. In the end, Bradley realized she didn’t have enough justices on her side and no vote was taken.
To date, Bradley has not filed any kind of charges against Prosser. Instead, the story was leaked to the George Soros–funded Wisconsin Center for Investigative Journalism, who used three anonymous sources to back up Bradley’s story. There were six justices present at the time of the incident, four of whom would be more likely to back Prosser’s version of the story. That leaves Abrahamson and Bradley as the only two remaining justices present. One source present speculated the third source may have been Bradley’s law clerk, who likely didn’t actually see the confrontation but may have head Bradley shout “I was choked.”
Speculation is abundant as to why Bradley decided to forgo a criminal complaint against Prosser, deciding instead to go to the press ten days after the event. Some say Bradley’s complaint wouldn’t have stood up if given the scrutiny of a criminal investigation. Furthermore, others speculate that if any formal criminal proceedings had moved forward (a restraining-order filing, for instance), Prosser would be afforded evidentiary hearings, testimony, and discovery.
Furthermore, sources unanimously believed that it was Shirley Abrahamson who has been the impetus behind the story, managing the press operation from behind the scenes. Justices had been working together regularly since the incident without any signs of rancor until Abrahamson decided to make this an issue, sources believe.
While Bradley has not filed any charges against Prosser, an investigation was initiated by the Capitol Police, who then quickly turned the case over to the Dane County Sheriff, David Mahoney — who once actually appeared in a campaign ad supporting the reelection of Chief Justice Abrahamson. The ad also included not-yet-famous circuit-court judge Maryann Sumi, whose ruling the Supreme Court had to vacate in order to allow Scott Walker’s collective-bargaining bill to stand.
i still call BS on this story.
btt
Our courts are just little legislatures.
***
BS in what way? Upon whom are you calling BS?
so in other words, she’s a typical, lying, Leftist slunt...
Judge Prosser....NEVER EVER trust what a Democrat says....Abrhamson LIED to you, just remember that.
And these Commies sit on the Wisconsin Supreme Court? IMO, the only reason Bradley hasn’t filed charges is because she’d open herself to false arrest charges, As would Abrahamson, should it come out she’s behind all this.
Two jerks with an agenda, incompetent enough to not think things through before going down a road, thus showing not only their incompetence but their hate for true justice.
BS that he choked her....BS.
Choking would leave bruses or loss of voice - I know from experience. Obviously she can talk so I question the occurance. And, why is George Soros–funded Wisconsin Center for Investigative Journalism doing anything in this but to discredit or smear. I am so sick of the name soros! He is a criminal and should be investigated and jailed, the bath turd!
55% of law school graduates are women. This will be getting worse. Come election time I don’t vote for female judges unless I happen to know she is good. County Gov’t here is female dominated (they won elections) and has been very corrupt and dittos for the school board
Lying scum liberla who should be removed from the court for her actions.
Reading [T]wits makes me very afraid for our country. The calls for Prosser’s resignation based on an accusation far outweigh reasoned posts.
Lord help us.
Law is become far less interesting ~ much of it is a consequence of computerization. These days a mid-level lawyer can search the entire body of law and find every relevant statute and relevant case IN SECONDS. His opponents can do the same.
So, where's any room for creativity in that? Maybe your hairdo or putting on different lipstick?
This is another case of a “seriousness-of-the-charge” incident the dems like to cook up in hopes some of the slime they throw at the wall will stick. Prosser should dare her to file criminal charges so Bradley will have to make her statements under oath.
“i still call BS on this story.”
The story rings true. The BS is the charges by leftist judges. The leftist judges are trying to take Prosser down through a phony charge. The incident was initiated by Bradley. Abrahamson put fuel on the fire by leaking her version of the incident.
Right there Bradley proved that she lied with her own words. Probably because she knows that, as a female liberal, the "media" will side with her and guess which side the NYT, WaPo and LAT will print?.......
So, where is the “intimidating a justice” charge against that thug and dirtbag Bradley?
“Bradley charged toward Prosser, shaking her clenched fist in his face.”
Who is it that needs anger management?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.