[edcoil]

I marriage is of such little value, why did the NYT support gays getting married?

[Morpheus2009]

I marriage is of such little value, why did the NYT support gays getting married?

One word - PROVOCATION

They want to hype the gays marrying because they know to the religious who do care, that is a decent insult to get them mad. After all, they need to have the impression that gays are so vastly hated for imitating what is sacred in order to keep their politics rolling. Without exaggerated hatred, identity politics would crumble.

[Obadiah]

Good point, but you miss the point. The NYTimes’(liberal, 60’s radical, satanic) agenda has always been to tell people to do whatever is right in their own eyes, God is dead, etc.

[MrB]

why did the NYT support gays getting married?

Despite what they claim, the answer to the "why" is "to destroy marriage".

[longtermmemmory]

homosexuals are not monogomous.

the idea is to cheeping normal marriage into the fetishist.

see brave new world.

fUN FuN fuN

[ardara]

The ny times supported gay marriage because they want to destroy the institution of marriage.The times wants to destroy all institutions that people of faith hold dear.

[Albion Wilde]

I marriage is of such little value, why did the NYT support gays getting married?

Ding ding ding ding ding! We have a winner!