Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Maid 'laid' low as DA paid for digs (kept working as a hooker even under DA supervision)
NY Post ^ | 07/03/11 | BRAD HAMILTON and LARRY CELONA

Posted on 07/03/2011 5:01:08 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster

Maid 'laid' low as DA paid for digs

By BRAD HAMILTON and LARRY CELONA

Last Updated: 7:16 AM, July 3, 2011

Posted: 1:06 AM, July 3, 2011

She was turning tricks on the taxpayers' dime!

The Sofitel maid who accused Dominique Strauss-Kahn of a sex attack in his suite wasn't just a hotel hooker -- she continued to work as a prostitute in a Brooklyn hotel where she was stashed by prosecutors, The Post has learned.

The so-called victim, whose web of lies has crippled the Manhattan DA's case against the former International Monetary Fund boss, played host to a parade of paying male visitors in the weeks after Strauss-Kahn's arrest, a prosecution source said.

"While she was under our supervision, there were multiple 'dates' and encounters at the hotel on the DA's dime," the source said of her paid hotel room. "That's a great deal for her. She doesn't have to cover her expenses."

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: dsk; prositute; rape; strausskahn
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051 next last
While she was under our supervision, there were multiple 'dates' and encounters at the hotel on the DA's dime," the source said of her paid hotel room.

What supervision? You mean DA is also running a sting operation on illegal prostitution at the side while prosecuting DSK?

1 posted on 07/03/2011 5:01:15 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Can you say “Crystal”?


2 posted on 07/03/2011 5:02:55 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Not buying it, but the paper must be saying it is legal to rape hookers in new York city. Does that include, former hookers, current hookers and future hookers. Maybe the young daughters of people working a the paper thought about hooking, can they also be raped and it be legal????


3 posted on 07/03/2011 5:07:22 AM PDT by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Nafissatou Diallo

4 posted on 07/03/2011 5:12:12 AM PDT by abb ("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

It is true you can rape a hooker, but lack consent becomes much more difficult to prove when he can say that she offered sex and he had no intention to pay. If he simply refused to pay her after the deed and there was a fight over it, there is no crime. She had no right to charge for sex so it isn’t theft, and there was no rape because the sex act was consensual.

Besides, she is changing her story too much now, this case is over.


5 posted on 07/03/2011 5:20:31 AM PDT by politicalmerc (The whole earth may move, but God's throne is never shaken. I think I'll stand by Him..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: abb

D E P O R T


6 posted on 07/03/2011 5:28:02 AM PDT by Surrounded_too
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: politicalmerc

Duh, professional hookers always get the money up front. Alway, always, always. This is just a simple case of the guy being guilty as hell and. His defense is to convict the victim. Have not seen one factual thing about her changing her story, but have seen a lot of third party he said, she said, they said, bs, that does not mean anything.


7 posted on 07/03/2011 5:28:06 AM PDT by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

She’s lied on her asylum application, lied on her taxes, lied to get subsidized housing, and launders money for drug dealers.

Whether she was raped or not, she’s not a credible witness. If she had a Scots jury, the best she could hope for was “not proven.”

BTW, how does a man without a weapon force oral sex on a fit young woman who has her teeth?


8 posted on 07/03/2011 5:28:34 AM PDT by heartwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: abb

well OK then. Guilt is not necessarily established.


9 posted on 07/03/2011 5:29:22 AM PDT by corkoman (Steadfast and Loyal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: heartwood

Rape is based upon the allegation, but the physical evinced must also support the allegation. All of the bull crap about she lied here etc is not admissible without the judge allows it then it can be crossed. And as to a weapon, I can kill you in a second with a letter opener are a pair of scissors.


10 posted on 07/03/2011 5:37:41 AM PDT by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: abb

I dunno about any other FReepers, but I’m getting a bit uncomfortable with the narrative.

This seems so much like something James Carville would do.


11 posted on 07/03/2011 5:44:11 AM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (BUY AMERICAN. The job you save will be your son's, or your daughter's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat
...it is legal to rape hookers in new York city. Does that include, former hookers, current hookers and future hookers.

It is illegal to rape hookers. It is, however, very hard, possibly impossible, to prove rape beyond a reasonable doubt when the victim/witness is also a criminal. Criminals do tend to lie, and all hookers are criminals. You need some third party evidence to confirm lack of consent.
12 posted on 07/03/2011 5:49:32 AM PDT by Cheburashka (Barack Obama, the Stickless Wonder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

Here’s some “facts” for you: they dropped his million dollar bail for a PC bond. That doesn’t happen. I understand your point, and I even agree with you. However there is PLENTY reasonable doubt here. The credibility of the witness is shot and he has the money to fight.

I know you want this guy to be guilty, but its just not going to happen. By the way, the DA’s office said she was hooking in the hotel they put her up in, the Jail has the recording of the telephone call with a drug dealer about the financial windfall. You have the same source for the parts of the story you like as you do for the parts of the story you don’t like: the news. Unless you want to tell us now that you have some personal inside knowledge.

This case is cooked man. No offense it just is.


13 posted on 07/03/2011 5:54:06 AM PDT by politicalmerc (The whole earth may move, but God's throne is never shaken. I think I'll stand by Him..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

As for professional hookers always taking their money upfront, I won’t challenged your knowledge on that one! But I will say this: as a defense attorney I would make a lot of the fact she was a hooker at all. Her motivation could easily be MONEY, not the 50-250 she might make on a trick but the millions she would make by accusing the man of rape. The fact of this case is that you have a slimebag and a hooker going at each other. Its a tie, and in a criminal proceeding that means not guilty.


14 posted on 07/03/2011 5:57:13 AM PDT by politicalmerc (The whole earth may move, but God's throne is never shaken. I think I'll stand by Him..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

If Cyrus Vance Jr. had any aspirations for higher office, they’re pretty much dashed. It’ll be interesting to see how he gets himself out of this mess.


15 posted on 07/03/2011 5:58:27 AM PDT by Krankor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: politicalmerc

I never said it was not lost, I believe a good deal of money has changed hands. What I was saying is this crap of trying the woman is against the law in this country. And a few people seem to think it is the correct thing to do.


16 posted on 07/03/2011 6:00:06 AM PDT by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: politicalmerc

You are correct. And as a former GI, it is a fact they get their money up front.


17 posted on 07/03/2011 6:03:14 AM PDT by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

18 posted on 07/03/2011 6:03:54 AM PDT by abb ("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: abb

NOT GUILTY.


19 posted on 07/03/2011 6:03:56 AM PDT by NativeNewYorker (Freepin' Jew Boy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat
All of the bull crap about she lied here etc is not admissible without the judge allows it then it can be crossed.

She lied under oath to the grand jury. She's done.

20 posted on 07/03/2011 6:09:05 AM PDT by mac_truck ( Aide toi et dieu t aidera)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: NativeNewYorker; All

BTW, here’s where that pic came from.

http://bigpeace.com/jxenakis/2011/07/02/frances-politics-in-turmoil-from-collapse-of-strauss-kahn-rape-case/

France’s Politics In Turmoil From Collapse Of Strauss-Kahn Rape Case
Posted by John J. Xenakis Jul 2nd 2011 at 11:54 am in Europe


21 posted on 07/03/2011 6:10:50 AM PDT by abb ("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat
And a few people seem to think it is the correct thing to do.

I really think you misunderstand me. I think he is a scumbag and either a rapist or would-be rapist. I just think this lady is the wrong one to nail him. The rules of evidence on this one are clear. Its going to come down to he said she said unless there is some good physical evidence that the defense can't explain.

When he said she said, it all comes down to credibility and impeachment evidence. All he needs is reasonable doubt.

I'm really not trying to be rude or insulting, we probably agree much more than you think, but legally this case is cooked, unless some of these facts are not as they have been presented.

22 posted on 07/03/2011 6:11:28 AM PDT by politicalmerc (The whole earth may move, but God's throne is never shaken. I think I'll stand by Him..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: abb

And people say you can’t buy something for a $1.00


23 posted on 07/03/2011 6:11:46 AM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Krankor
Vance bungles another one
24 posted on 07/03/2011 6:12:06 AM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: mac_truck

If she was in front of a grand jury, why would they ask her about he housing application, do not get me wrong, she has no business being in this country. I am just opposed to trying the woman by allegation out side of the courthouse.


25 posted on 07/03/2011 6:14:12 AM PDT by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
From '09....

Morgenthau Plans to Endorse Vance; Morgenthau’s Office Declines to Comment About Whether He Actually Can

Way to go, Downstate.

26 posted on 07/03/2011 6:15:02 AM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Looks like the guy may have been set up. Look who is now IMF Chief? Why it’s a former employee of the famous global law firm of James Baker.


27 posted on 07/03/2011 6:17:07 AM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: politicalmerc

When I heard that the prosecutors were the ones who found the dirt on her, I figured it was a set-up. Plus, NYC is liberal-liberal-liberal. Therefore, the Duke University scenario fits — MAKE the crime fit the liberal mind-set, and then it is true, whether it is or not.

She’s a skank.


28 posted on 07/03/2011 6:17:18 AM PDT by bboop (Stealth Tutor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: politicalmerc
I think he is a scumbag...

But that's not against the law. Nor is it illegal to be rich, obnoxious, or even a white Duke Lacrosse player. A good chunk of the manure in this case is a result of the State-Run Media believing anything/everything a prosecutor says.

As it was in the DukeLax Frame.

29 posted on 07/03/2011 6:17:25 AM PDT by abb ("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: abb
Oh pleeze.....It's not like he's the president of the United States...enter Bubba...

Or even VP...enter Gore...

Or even a Congressman...enter Weiner

Pssst...None of them got set up either.....

30 posted on 07/03/2011 6:26:04 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: abb
Oh pleeze.....It's not like he's the president of the United States...enter Bubba...

Or even VP...enter Gore...

Or even a Congressman...enter Weiner

Pssst...None of them got set up either.....

31 posted on 07/03/2011 6:28:19 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat
Yeh right...He's gonna kill her if she doesn't...

These "ignorant maids" know exactly what they're dealing with in this place...It's not exactly a Motel 6.

32 posted on 07/03/2011 6:30:38 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

FWIW, I don’;t trust the vic, the alleged perp, or even the bloody DA. This is a mess, and I’d be willing to bet there’s much more than profligate degeneracy, shoddy policework, and prosecutorial misconduct going on here.


33 posted on 07/03/2011 6:32:58 AM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

True, that. But my point is that the State-Run Media decides for us who is guilty/innocent based on some criteria that is based upon political correctness and perception of victim/accuser sympathetic vibes.


34 posted on 07/03/2011 6:35:16 AM PDT by abb ("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
I called her "liar" right from the beginning....as soon as I heard she had "volunteered" to take that floor.

I also said I believe there is someone else working at the hotel who is part of her game.

I knew someone in the hotel business...And these were the BIG hotels. Hooking and love affairs go on every day. "You never, never saw a thing".

35 posted on 07/03/2011 6:42:05 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
I'm afraid that just like the Duke Case..."Womens' Rights" come first. There is some friggin' concept that women won't lie....

Regardless...you take a police report and go with it.

What bothers me more is that like Crystal, this ______ has a kid, too. Maybe many according to her tax form.

36 posted on 07/03/2011 6:47:43 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
What bothers me more is that like Crystal, this ______ has a kid, too. Maybe many according to her tax form.

I hear you. But if there's more to this story than a simple shakedown, there's some seriously scary stuff going on. Stuff that affects far more than the alleged vic's kid/s, the alleged vic, and the alleged perp.

37 posted on 07/03/2011 6:54:21 AM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

The statement was, did he have a weapon, there are always weapons available. But maybe in new York the maids are told to relax and enjoy rape after all it will not last long. I wonder more about a so called high class motel hiring someone that may have aids to clean my room.


38 posted on 07/03/2011 6:55:19 AM PDT by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

A shakedown, or she could have been assaulted. Things are very bad when not one single person or institution involved engenders any faith and/or trust.


39 posted on 07/03/2011 6:56:34 AM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

Like maybe the chicago mob tied to zero getting in their plant as the new IMF boss?


40 posted on 07/03/2011 7:00:01 AM PDT by going hot (Happiness is a momma deuce)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: going hot

Well, I doubt the presidency of France is worth this effort :)


41 posted on 07/03/2011 7:02:43 AM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

Which part?

I have questions, too.


42 posted on 07/03/2011 7:07:56 AM PDT by SuzyQue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Surrounded_too

Jail then deport...she committed a lot of crimes here so she should go to prison...after her term, she should be shipped back to her homeland....


43 posted on 07/03/2011 7:15:33 AM PDT by Yorlik803 (better to die on your feet than live on your knees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Time to investigate the DA! Sounds like one of the points of origin in the frame is there in the DA’s office. This hooker just didn’t come up with the idea to frame an IMF President on her own. There are bigger fish involved in this plot with the help of the NYC DA’s office for cover.


44 posted on 07/03/2011 7:22:34 AM PDT by classified
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla; abb; Sacajaweau

What we have is lawyers, hookers, and politicians. Start the popcorn machine!


45 posted on 07/03/2011 7:47:13 AM PDT by Enterprise ("Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise

And bankers.


46 posted on 07/03/2011 7:57:25 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster (The way to crush the bourgeois is to grind them between the millstones of taxation and inflation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Vaduz

47 posted on 07/03/2011 8:03:24 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lame and ill-informed post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise; mewzilla; abb; Sacajaweau
What we have is lawyers, hookers, and politicians.

Distinguishing one from the other is the hard part.

48 posted on 07/03/2011 8:07:06 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lame and ill-informed post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

Evidence impugning the credibility of a material witness is always admissible.


49 posted on 07/03/2011 8:29:33 AM PDT by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau; abb
She's a prostitue, and a Muslim..so, I have an idea..

Let's try her, and introduce sharia law into her trial in NYC, we know what they do to prostitutes...

50 posted on 07/03/2011 9:15:41 AM PDT by ken5050 (Save the Earth..It's the only planet with chocolate!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson