Posted on 07/03/2011 3:35:55 PM PDT by SmithL
So, I went online Friday looking to buy a copy of John Kenneth Galbraith's "The Affluent Society & Other Writings, 1952-1967." Thought it might be timely to revisit the Harvard economist's distinction between "private affluence" and "public squalor."
Barnes & Noble's website was selling it for $26.53. Total, which included California sales tax: $28.79. "Total Before Tax" at Amazon.com: $26.40. "Estimated Tax To Be Collected: $0.00."
At Overstock.com, I could still buy furniture and various knickknacks free of the 7.25 percent tax, even though California's law mandating out-of-state Internet retailers to start collecting the taxes was now in effect.
In other words, screw you, California, and your laws.
"They're not intending to comply, by all indications," said Betty Yee, former chairwoman and current member of the state Board of Equalization, the agency charged with implementing the law. Friday evening, the board posted a "special notice clarifying the obligations of out-of-state retailers" on its website (sfg.ly/mh6SxF).
"So, we'll bill them at the end of this quarter, based on estimates either they provide or we come up from other data sources. Then, if they don't come forward and pay, we'll consider other courses of action."
That most likely means litigation, or, as Amazon and Overstock might see it, a game of "catch us if you can."
(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...
BTW, Nissan NA pulled out and now reside SW of Nashville.
Thanks SmithL.
Gee, thanks alot! Move where? I was born here, lived here all my life. Should I move to tornado alley, or hurricane zone, or a flood plain, or snow country, or the now polluted gulf area?
I spoke with a used book store retailer yesterday. He said “Associates” are third parties not the second party used book re-sellers. It is those who have websites that serve as marketing conduits to the Amazon.com website that were shut down. So you are right - by getting rid of the third parties Amazon.com has no more presence in California and thus no more tax obligation.
I spoke with a used book store retailer yesterday. He said “Associates” are third parties not the second party used book re-sellers. It is those who have websites that serve as marketing conduits to the Amazon.com website that were shut down. So you are right - by getting rid of the third parties Amazon.com has no more presence in California and thus no more tax obligation.
I spoke with a used book store retailer yesterday. He said “Associates” are third parties not the second party used book re-sellers. It is those who have websites that serve as marketing conduits to the Amazon.com website that were shut down. So you are right - by getting rid of the third parties Amazon.com has no more presence in California and thus no more tax obligation.
ping
.....by way of a link from a California-based affiliate’s website ...
I don’t know about that. I think an affiliate bookshop for instance that sells a book via the Amazon site listing would trigger the California presence even if they had no website of their own.
I recently bought a used volume from a California seller listed as one of several sellers on the Amazon site. That seller is now not an Amazon affiliate by my understanding of the situation.
Are you saying that an Amazon Marketplace seller located in California can no longer sell through Amazon? That’s not surprising, given the nature of the California law, but it is really unfortunate. There are many people who make their living selling books as Amazon Marketplace sellers. There are books that can be found only from Marketplace sellers. All of this commerce is being destroyed by our increasingly tyrannical government.
——Are you saying that an Amazon Marketplace seller located in California can no longer sell through Amazon?-——
That is my understanding.
It was always meant to come down to a court fight. CA wants to make new law by saying that a retail company DOES have a physical presence in the state, even if that presence is a few guys in an office programming. They then want to use that presence in order to extend to the company the obligation to pay sales tax.
Yeah, when sale tax receipt totals collected are less than before the new law then it will be back to the drawing board to come up with another draconian tax plan. Liberals are just as happy as can be watching the exodus from California.
I just received 4 emails from various companies explaining to me that I would no longer qualify as an affiliate (Amazon was one of them) because I live in California. They said they would be happy to resume our relationships when I did not have my business in California. My answer is to incorporate in Nevada and open a PO Box virtual office there. Screw these idiots. My business will probably never pay me anything while I live here either.
Cue Governor Christie
I’ve read there’s a case regarding the Current mail order company and its subsidiaries which backs Amazon’s position.
I’ve read there’s a case regarding the Current mail order company and its subsidiaries which backs Amazon’s position.
Don’t put it past the State Board of Equalization to come after residents for use taxes.
You sound like the typical tax scamming black market internet drone.
Do you really operate a business, or do you just try to scam extra money by operating a third tier Internet sales layer?
Let me guess, you spend a lot of time clicking through various internet websites, so those sites can charge paid advertisers more money, for all those clicks. Right?
And you call that a business?
Or maybe the smart ones stay to continue a fight and aren’t quitters by leaving. Our fore fathers stayed and looked how that worked out.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.