Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bareheaded motorcyclist dies in helmet protest
CNN ^ | July 4, 2011 10:20 p.m. EDT | By Nina Raja

Posted on 07/05/2011 7:06:05 AM PDT by Red Badger

Edited on 07/05/2011 7:07:30 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

A bareheaded motorcyclist participating in a ride to protest mandatory helmet laws was killed when he was thrown over the handlebars in Onondaga, New York.

Philip A. Contos, 55, of Parish, New York, was on a ride organized by the Onondaga chapter of American Bikers Aimed Towards Education (ABATE), state police said Sunday.


(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; US: New York
KEYWORDS: helmet; irony; motorcycle; protest
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last
To: =8 mrrabbit 8=

I DID SEARCH. IT DID NOT COME UP!.............


41 posted on 07/05/2011 9:00:11 AM PDT by Red Badger (Nothing is a 'right' if someone has to give it to you................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: wtc911
Doesn't matter who he leaves behind, they were not hurt physically. As far as dying goes you can go at anytime, anywhere without warning.

Whether or not someone wears a helmet or wears a seat belt is no one's business except the individual involved, certainly not the governments business or place to pass such laws. If you think seat belt laws and helmet laws are good things then you need to switch to being a Democrat because there is nothing constitutional about such laws. They are an attack on individual freedom.

42 posted on 07/05/2011 9:37:40 AM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: DManA

You give up many personal freedoms when you choose to drive on the road, motorcycle or not.


43 posted on 07/05/2011 9:49:00 AM PDT by dangerdoc (see post #6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jagusafr
If you are trying to convice a bike-rider to be prudent, you have a point.

If you're advocating government control over individuals, your argument is a non-sequitur.

44 posted on 07/05/2011 10:00:41 AM PDT by HIDEK6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: servantboy777
Recently in Texas, they passed a no refusal law for holiday weekends. In other words, if your suspected of drinking and driving, the government WILL take your blood...on the spot, without a lawyer present.

IIRC, we've had that here in MN for years. (and not just on holidays) Here they call it "implied consent" . Nice Orwellian ring to it.

45 posted on 07/05/2011 10:03:50 AM PDT by WOBBLY BOB ( "I don't want the majority if we don't stand for something"- Jim Demint)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: NELSON111
NOT being forced into socialized medicine negates both arguments.

The correct answer is more freedom and less regulation. :)

46 posted on 07/05/2011 10:09:48 AM PDT by WOBBLY BOB ( "I don't want the majority if we don't stand for something"- Jim Demint)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Chuzzlewit

no different than the nanny statists who argue for banning trans fats,guns,tobacco.... (Mayor Bloomturd ,Moochelle, et al.)

they argue we need more food regulations/fat bans/ menu edicts,etc -— in our ‘best interest’ for health and it will save ‘the government’ money !

who could be against that!?


47 posted on 07/05/2011 10:11:12 AM PDT by WOBBLY BOB ( "I don't want the majority if we don't stand for something"- Jim Demint)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: WOBBLY BOB; servantboy777
IIRC, we've had that here in MN for years. (and not just on holidays) Here they call it "implied consent"

This is different from what servantboy777 was referring to. Implied consent has been around for a while but does not force you to give your blood - it just imposes mandatory penalties if you refuse to submit to the officer's demands.

This new no refusal tactic is where there are judges present at the checkpoints to issue a warrant to collect your blood. No refusal allowed. Tampa does this.

48 posted on 07/05/2011 11:08:53 AM PDT by Dan Nunn (Support the NRA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Ironic bump!


49 posted on 07/05/2011 11:43:53 AM PDT by TexasRepublic (Socialism is the gospel of envy and the religion of thieves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangerdoc

You give up many personal freedoms when you choose to live in a cave too. We have given up most of our personal freedoms in the past 50 years.


50 posted on 07/05/2011 11:50:27 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Dan Nunn

whoa. that’s hardcore.

do they have trained nurses doing this or some schmuck with a needle and a badge?

(I hate it when they miss my veins 3 times in a row)


51 posted on 07/05/2011 12:37:01 PM PDT by WOBBLY BOB ( "I don't want the majority if we don't stand for something"- Jim Demint)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Thanks, but I've been here already
52 posted on 07/05/2011 1:10:34 PM PDT by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WOBBLY BOB
But don't dare close the bath houses in the middle of an AIDS epidemic.

in our ‘best interest’ for health and it will save ‘the government’ money ! who could be against that!?

53 posted on 07/05/2011 1:15:52 PM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Badger is correct. I just did a search and his is the only thread that comes up.

I think these new outlets must change their headlines from time to time.


54 posted on 07/05/2011 1:19:54 PM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/search?m=all;o=time;q=quick;s=helmet%20protest

search = helmet + protest

Took only 5 seconds...

=8-)


55 posted on 07/05/2011 3:47:07 PM PDT by =8 mrrabbit 8=
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Another candidate for the Darwin Award.

I do not believe that it is a State’s place to mandate Motorcycle helmets. I do, however, believe that only an idiot would ride without one. Preservation of idiots is just not something any State should do.


56 posted on 07/05/2011 4:23:05 PM PDT by Jeff Gordon (Don't pick a fight with an old man. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: =8 mrrabbit 8=

That’s a ‘key word’ search.

I do title searches.

That’s why MODS don’t want you changing titles.

Posting the same story with a different title is okay..........


57 posted on 07/06/2011 5:38:08 AM PDT by Red Badger (Nothing is a 'right' if someone has to give it to you................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson