If a guilty murderer went free, I hardly think that’s cause for celebration.
And in my opinion, there was plenty of damning evidence presented. Just like in the O.J. case.
Better that a guilty murderer walk free than an innocent person face guilt.
Casey probably did something, but it was very difficult to prove. The jury can only rule on facts in evidence, and within the guidelines of the law.
It’s a tough burden. Thank God for that, or else the State could easily imprison dissidents. Then nobody would be free.
Apples and oranges. The OJ case is a different ball of wax.
Yes, Casey is the WHITE O.J..
She and her family LIED their way out of it and EXPLOITED people’s FEELINGS in the worst way.
Poor Caylee. No justice for her.
The problem is that, unlike the O.J. case, the damning evidence presented against Anthony proved her to be a despicable person, not a murderer.
American law requires that a guilty verdict be based on evidence that the accused committed the crime. The Anthony prosecution didn’t prove either that the child died from murder or that the mother was involved.
The Simpson prosecution did show credible, tangible evidence that there was a murder and that linked him to it.
As for the Anthony case, it’s not a crime in America to be a sleazeball.
“there was plenty of damning evidence presented”
Really? Where was the baby killed? When was she killed? What was the manner of death? Why did the prosecution not call may of its own witnesses?
For the record, I think she was guilty, too.
TV talking Lib heads exploding is very telling.