Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Ghana doesn't love Obama anymore
www.csmonitor.com ^ | July 6, 2011 | Jonathan Zimmerman

Posted on 07/06/2011 11:44:12 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe

Here’s a quick quiz culled from the opinion pages in Ghana, where I’m teaching this summer: Who is the imperialist race traitor waging war on Africa?

The answer, of course, is Barack Obama. The reason is the bombing of Libya, which is immensely unpopular over here. And so is President Obama, who now stands accused of betraying his own African heritage.

That’s a big change from the last time I taught in Ghana, during Mr. Obama’s state visit in 2009. His smiling face was everywhere, from T-shirts and soccer balls to billboards and murals. Gripped by “Obama Fever,” as Ghanaians called it, massive crowds lined the streets to welcome the first African-American US president to Africa.

You can still see Obama’s likeness around town these days, especially in the tourist areas. But for many Ghanaians, the honeymoon with Obama is over. And it started to go sour when the first warplanes strafed Benghazi and Tripoli, in a NATO effort to protect civilians from strongman Muammar Qaddafi.

That was the Libya-intervention’s official purpose, anyway. But Ghanaians aren’t buying it. To many observers here, it looks like a grab for Libya’s oil riches; to others, it’s a nefarious Western plot to re-colonize Africa.

Ghana's soft-spot for Qaddafi Astonishingly, some Ghanaians also have a soft spot in their hearts for Mr. Qaddafi. “Does Obama know what Muammar-al Qaddafi means to Africa?” one Ghanaian columnist asked last month, citing Qaddafi’s generous aid to poorer African countries.

Others have hailed the Libyan’s 2009 demand for a “United States of Africa:” a federation of countries with a single government, currency, and army.

To many Ghanaians, this vision conjures the pan-African philosophy of their own independence leader, Kwame Nkrumah, a key figure in the 20th-century struggle to liberate black peoples around the world.

(Excerpt) Read more at csmonitor.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: africa; ghana
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

1 posted on 07/06/2011 11:44:17 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
“Does Obama know what Muammar-al Qaddafi means to Africa?” one Ghanaian columnist asked last month,...

If you'll look past the American press you'll find that 0bama doesn't know much of anything.

2 posted on 07/06/2011 11:52:14 PM PDT by TigersEye (Wranglers not Levis. Levi Strauss is anti-2nd Amendment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

What Ghadaffi means to Africa? Amongst the most corrupt , backwards and tyrannical peoples of the planet he was voted king of kings.

Interestingly enough, he doesn’t want to play with the Islamic overlords nor give up his resources to the up and coming Egyptian MB government.

What the Ghanians need to do is reframe their colonization question with more knowledge on the North African Caliphate which is unfolding/... as just phase one.


3 posted on 07/07/2011 12:13:58 AM PDT by himno hero ("Armageddon is well seeded, America will pay"... Barrack Obama's vision)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: himno hero; TigersEye
Opposed to a policy of regime change in Libya:
Ralph Nader
Cindy Sheehan
Medea Benjamin
Dennis Kucinich
Bernie Sanders
Charlie Wrangel
Dick Durbin
Jim Webb
Al Franken
Barbara Lee
Barbara Boxer
Maxine Waters
Raul Grijalva
Cynthia McKinney
Louis Farrakhan
Ramsey Clarke
Jeremiah Wright
Malik Zulu Shabazz
Fidel Castro
Hugo Chavez
Daniel Ortega
Robert Mugabe
Vladimir Putin
Kim Jong-Il
Barack Hussein Obama Junior
4 posted on 07/07/2011 1:05:28 AM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Thanks Tailgunner Joe.
...Who is the imperialist race traitor waging war on Africa? [Zero]. The reason is the bombing of Libya, which is immensely unpopular... [Zero] now stands accused of betraying his own African heritage. [what about his Arab heritage?] ...the honeymoon with [Zero] is over. And it started to go sour when the first warplanes strafed Benghazi and Tripoli... To many observers here, it looks like a grab for Libya's oil riches; to others, it’s a nefarious Western plot to re-colonize Africa.
If NATO were just trying to grab Libya's oil, and if the US were helping, it would be perfectly fine with me -- but NATO's just trying to get on the good side of some jihadists who are trying to grab Libya's oil, and Zero is trying to help with this.


5 posted on 07/07/2011 4:05:52 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Yes, as a matter of fact, it is that time again -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
Others have hailed the Libyan’s 2009 demand for a “United States of Africa:” a federation of countries with a single government, currency, and army.

Absolute proof the Colonel is insane.

6 posted on 07/07/2011 4:59:26 AM PDT by DUMBGRUNT (The best is the enemy of the good!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: himno hero

Ghadaffi sponsored a lot of schools and infrastructure in west africa. Whatever kind of mad man he was/is, he’s still a guy fighting against AlQ.


7 posted on 07/07/2011 5:05:26 AM PDT by Cronos ( W Szczebrzeszynie chrzaszcz brzmi w trzcinie I Szczebrzeszyn z tego slynie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DUMBGRUNT

he always was insane.


8 posted on 07/07/2011 5:05:51 AM PDT by Cronos ( W Szczebrzeszynie chrzaszcz brzmi w trzcinie I Szczebrzeszyn z tego slynie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
“... And it started to go sour when the first warplanes strafed Benghazi and Tripoli, in a NATO effort to protect civilians from strongman Muammar Qaddafi.”

Strongman? I always thought Qaddafi was the worlds first transvestite leader considering he wears dresses and makeup to go with the long hair. Strongman indeed!

9 posted on 07/07/2011 5:40:42 AM PDT by Flavious_Maximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Hmmm Obama soccer balls...that would be a pretty good product for 2012! Put Obama’s face on their with the works kick him out..... (I would buy one!)


10 posted on 07/07/2011 6:47:12 AM PDT by jakerobins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

“You can still see Obama’s likeness around town these days, especially in the tourist areas.”

In the tourist areas? Seriously, Ghana actually has tourists? There are many places I’d love to visit while on vacation. Ghana isn’t one of them.


11 posted on 07/07/2011 7:04:56 AM PDT by MplsSteve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

Ghadaffi has spent loads of money on schools, mosques and other buildings throughout his lifelong Jihad. Him fighting AlQaeda? That’s just the fish feeding on one another. He has been exporting terrorism all his life in the name of his jihad.


12 posted on 07/07/2011 7:25:22 AM PDT by himno hero ("Armageddon is well seeded, America will pay"... Barrack Obama's vision)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: himno hero

I don’t give a rat’s patoot what the Ghanians do or think.


13 posted on 07/07/2011 2:05:03 PM PDT by TigersEye (Wranglers not Levis. Levi Strauss is anti-2nd Amendment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
Opposed to a policy of regime change in Libya:

Barack Hussein Obama Junior

That makes a lot of sense. Not. You really need to up your meds, TJ.

14 posted on 07/07/2011 2:06:59 PM PDT by TigersEye (Wranglers not Levis. Levi Strauss is anti-2nd Amendment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
Obama rules out Libyan regime change - March 29, 2011 - "If we tried to overthrow Gaddafi by force our coalition would splinter. We would likely have to put US troops on the ground to accomplish that mission or risk killing many civilians from the air....To be blunt, we went down that road in Iraq... but regime change there took eight years, thousands of American and Iraqi lives, and nearly $1 trillion. That is not something we can afford to repeat in Libya." - Barack Hussein Obama Junior

Don't you get it, yet? Imam Obama is still running against George W. Bush!

Obama is against removing his socialist muslim comrade Kadaffy from power and YOU AGREE WITH HIM! Face reality! Obama is against America winning the war in Libya or anywhere else!

15 posted on 07/07/2011 9:29:09 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
0bama is against removing Gaddafi from power so he says he has to go and authorizes military action against him to keep him in power?

You're nuttier than squirrel crap.

16 posted on 07/07/2011 9:59:30 PM PDT by TigersEye (Wranglers not Levis. Levi Strauss is anti-2nd Amendment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
He is doing what the UN told him to do and nothing more. Don't you know anything about liberals? If the UN says bomb, they bomb, but the UN didn't approve regime change, so regime change is out of the question. Clinton bombed Iraq too, but it took Bush to remove Saddam from power because he was willing to ignore the UN. It will take a Republican to remove Kadaffy as well.
17 posted on 07/07/2011 10:10:42 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

That right there proves that you’re a complete fruit loop.


18 posted on 07/07/2011 10:14:13 PM PDT by TigersEye (Wranglers not Levis. Levi Strauss is anti-2nd Amendment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
Did Truman go to war in Korea to remove Kim Il-Sung from power? Did Johnson start the VietNam war because he intended to overthrow Ho Chi Minh? Get a clue, Democrats don't start wars because they want to win them, they start wars they DON'T want us to win.

Ron Paul won't be the Republican candidate and neither will any other kucinich konservatives or wrangel republicans.

19 posted on 07/07/2011 10:30:07 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

You have gone completely over the cliff. What does any of that insane ranting have to do with my original statement?


20 posted on 07/07/2011 10:44:02 PM PDT by TigersEye (Wranglers not Levis. Levi Strauss is anti-2nd Amendment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson