To: thefactor
Are you one of those “shoot to kill” people rather than “shoot to disable” people?
58 posted on
07/07/2011 8:01:57 AM PDT by
Past Your Eyes
(NO MORE SECOND TERMS!!)
To: Past Your Eyes
We shoot to stop. That means center mass. I shoot for an appendage I'm more likely to miss and hit little Susie who was walking home from school.
Shoot to disable is absolutely the most ludicrous idea the liberals have ever come up with and that's one thing that's actually agreed upon by 99% of FReepers.
61 posted on
07/07/2011 8:07:23 AM PDT by
thefactor
(yes, as a matter of fact, i DID only read the excerpt)
To: Past Your Eyes
Police, military, even civilian weapons carriers...
It’s always “shoot to stop”. In most situations, you aim center mass and keep firing until the threat ceases. “Safety drill” is two to center mass, one to the head.
Might look cool in the movies shooting a knife out of someones hands or shooting them in a foot... Reality isn’t TV though.
63 posted on
07/07/2011 8:15:26 AM PDT by
Dead Corpse
(explosive bolts, ten thousand volts at a million miles an hour)
To: Past Your Eyes
Since the only justification for shooting (in a civil, non-military environment) is to stop the actions of a person trying to kill or seriously injure you or an innocent 3d party, then lessening your effectiveness by trying some fanciful “shoot to disable” is admission that the shooting might not have been necessary in the first place.
Two to the center of visible mass and repeat if the threat still continues to be a threat. NO Coup de Grace to the head.
67 posted on
07/07/2011 8:25:43 AM PDT by
MindBender26
(Forget AMEX. Remember your Glock 27: Never Leave Home Without It!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson