Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ExxonMobil’s earnings: The real story you won’t hear in Washington
Exxonmobil perspectives ^ | April28,2011

Posted on 07/10/2011 12:32:51 PM PDT by Hojczyk

ExxonMobil’s earnings are from operations in more than 100 countries around the world. During the first quarter, more than three-quarters of our operating earnings came from outside of the United States.

The part of ExxonMobil’s business that refines and sells gasoline, diesel and other products in the United States represents less than 6 percent – or 6 cents on the dollar – of our earnings.

Why so little? Because we actually buy more crude oil to refine into gasoline and diesel in the U.S. than we produce ourselves. And these purchases are made on the open market at the prevailing rates.

During the first three months of this year, for every gallon of gasoline and other products we refined and sold in the United States, we earned about 7 cents. Compare that to the 40 to 60 cents per gallon that went from gasoline consumers to the government (state and federal) in gasoline taxes.

The underlying question people are asking is: Why are oil prices so high at the present time? The answer to this question is important because the price of crude oil accounts for most of the price of gasoline.

There are several factors involved in the rise in oil prices.

First, as a result of the global economy strengthening – particularly in countries like China, India and Brazil – demand for crude oil is on the rise.

Second, political instability in some oil-producing regions is contributing to uncertainty about future oil supplies. Oil markets are well-supplied today, but the issue is this: What will it cost to replace this supply if it is lost in the future? This uncertainty about tomorrow is reflected in prices today.

Finally, another factor behind higher oil prices is unique to the United States. And that’s the weak U.S. dollar. Oil and most other food and industrial commodities are invoiced in dollars. Accordingly, when the dollar goes “down” the price of primary commodities tend to go “up,” and vice versa.

The dollar is at a three-year low against other currencies and is approaching the record low which occurred in 2008, when oil prices were at historically high levels.

The dollar’s decline accelerated last week after a warning by Standard & Poor’s about the country’s $14.3 trillion debt and economic weakness compared to other countries.

So these factors all combine to drive oil prices up.

What is our government doing about it? Unfortunately, they’re reaching for the political playbook rather than seeking real solutions.

We understand that it’s simply too irresistible for many politicians in times of high oil prices and high earnings – they feel they have to demonize our industry.

Predictably last week the Administration established a task force to investigate oil and gas markets, now a time-honored tradition when prices increase.

And we’re seeing a return to the now-familiar misinformation about the oil industry’s taxes.

Over the last week as earnings season has approached, the Democratic Party leadership again talked about removing what they call $4 billion in oil industry subsidies. But what they really mean is that they want to increase our taxes by taking away long-standing deductions for our industry while leaving these same deductions in place for other sectors of the economy. The simple truth is that these are legitimate tax provisions to keep U.S. industry internationally competitive – to keep jobs from being exported to other countries.

Unfortunately, this false discussion about oil industry subsidies also reinforces another falsehood making the rounds: that ExxonMobil doesn’t pay its fair share of income taxes in the United States.

Let me state it unequivocally. Last year, our total taxes and duties to the U.S. government were $9.8 billion, which includes an income tax expense of $1.6 billion. Over the past five years, we incurred a total U.S. tax expense of almost $59 billion, which is $18 billion more than we earned in the United States during the same period.

And during the first quarter of this year, we incurred tax expenses in the United States of more than $3.1 billion on U.S. earnings of $2.6 billion.

So we have seen the predictable political positioning but no action to actually help bring down energy prices. In fact the government has chosen not to help increase supply by refusing to open up the vast energy resources in this country that are off limits to our industry.

We have seen exploration and development in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico – which accounts for 30 percent of all U.S. crude oil production – effectively banned for the past year by the Obama Administration.

In addition, legislation was enacted targeted at restricting the supply of oil from Canada – a country whose oil reserves are second only to Saudi Arabia’s.

Unfortunately, irresistible sound-bite politics rather than sound public policy is dominating the energy agenda in Washington – but there is one reason for optimism about America’s economic and energy security.

That optimism lies in America’s extraordinary natural gas endowment. This resource is providing the United States with an enormous economic advantage as a result of American ingenuity and innovation.

It’s nothing short of revolutionary that our industry has recently unlocked more than a 100 years’ worth of natural gas right here in the United States. And at some of the world’s lowest prices – last month natural gas was selling for 40 percent less in the U.S. than in Europe.

Think of the advantages this is already providing – in the form of power generation and fuel for manufacturing and other industries, not to mention the jobs and taxes natural gas production creates.

But there are concerns that political overreaction to a small number of isolated environmental issues could jeopardize this emerging industry and the benefits it provides.

Government policies did not cause the shale gas revolution in this country – but they could stop it in its tracks.

Policymakers need to look carefully at the facts and avoid a bias against natural gas and fossil fuel development in favor of far more costly energy sources that are already receiving massive subsidies.

In fact, we’ve already spent more on alternative energy subsidies than we did on the Manhattan and Apollo projects combined. And what do we have to show for it? Unreliable and uneconomic energy sources that still can’t compete – even at today’s prices.

On the other hand, natural gas is affordable, available – and doesn’t need taxpayer subsidies.

The technologies and industrial processes involved in developing shale gas are proven – the industry has successfully fracked more than a million wells over the last 60 years. There are thousands of feet of rock between the natural gas deposit where the fracking takes place and the water table.

Risk to water supplies and air quality can be and are being mitigated by using proper well design, operating with care and following industry best practices and procedures that are all subject to regulation and government oversight.

When these technologies are applied properly and the industry remains focused on operational integrity, we can protect our environment and public health and enjoy this unprecedented economic advantage.

Energy policy should enable safe and environmentally responsible development of all of America’s natural resources, which will support economic recovery and improved quality of life.

It’s time for our leaders to stop playing politics with the energy industry and to start working for solutions that will take the pressure off household budgets and enhance our energy security.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bigoil; exxonmobil; obama; oil

1 posted on 07/10/2011 12:32:54 PM PDT by Hojczyk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

If this was actually written/authorized by exxonmobil, it was the most politically candid statement by a major oil co I have ever seen.


2 posted on 07/10/2011 12:51:13 PM PDT by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

... and reasons 2 and 3 have been caused or at the least significantly affected by Obama.


3 posted on 07/10/2011 12:59:57 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WoofDog123

Anybody wondering why the dolls is so down?

I can spell it out in one 5 letter word——OBAMA.


4 posted on 07/10/2011 1:00:08 PM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Venturer

dolls=dollar, but you guessed that.


5 posted on 07/10/2011 1:00:43 PM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

I watched the last oil company hearings before Congress and it was sickening. Schumer was doing his political grandstanding like he was a paid actor. It was obvious what the oil companies were saying but nobody was listening. So which do we need more - oil companies or Congress. I say if the oil companies shut down for a month, we’d be in a panic. If Congress shut down for a month, we’d be celebrating.


6 posted on 07/10/2011 1:04:36 PM PDT by BipolarBob (Beer? That's the reason I get up in the afternoon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

bttt


7 posted on 07/10/2011 1:08:43 PM PDT by Matchett-PI ("I used to think Obama was an empty suit but now I think he has filled his pants." ~badgerlandjim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk
Liberals would have an orgasm seeing this; except they'd like to see the government get a larger piece of the pie.

On the other hand, Bill O'Reilly is so stupid, he wouldn't understand what he's looking at.

.

8 posted on 07/10/2011 1:09:31 PM PDT by Cobra64 (Common sense isn't common anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Venturer
dolls=dollar, but you guessed that.


9 posted on 07/10/2011 1:11:11 PM PDT by Cobra64 (Common sense isn't common anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BipolarBob
It was obvious what the oil companies were saying but nobody was listening.

Company executives blow out numbers. Too many people don't understand numbers; especially in Washington.

Graphs and charts are a much more effective communication medium.

.

Too bad the Stupid Party hasn't figured this out yet either.


10 posted on 07/10/2011 1:16:18 PM PDT by Cobra64 (Common sense isn't common anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64

Gee : What a great idea.


11 posted on 07/10/2011 1:27:36 PM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

posted at link’s website:

...Gas and Oil companies are milking the rest of the world for something that doesn’t truly belong to them to begin with. It belongs to all of the people on this planet...


12 posted on 07/10/2011 1:35:10 PM PDT by Java4Jay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Java4Jay
People fail to understand that oil companies BUY the oil from the countries they get it from. From there it COSTS to transport it and refine it.

If libtards are to get angry with anyone for "the people" it should be the governments of oil producing nations.

13 posted on 07/10/2011 1:43:41 PM PDT by mountn man (The pleasure you get from life, is equal to the attitude you put into it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Java4Jay

well to be fair most people don’t understand economics, much less the tremendous capital investment and technological know-how needed to operate exploration, drilling, extraction, refining operations. Add that to whatever silliness about belonging to everyone they have been infected with, and they can justify any expropriation from anyone/anything.

The one thing I do think is a justified issue is that a corp. can not be taxed on overseas ops, but a US citizen working overseas is 100% taxable on all income. I guess the issue is a corporation can change its citizenship/tax liability much more easily than a peon.


14 posted on 07/10/2011 1:46:48 PM PDT by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Java4Jay
>". It belongs to all of the people on this planet..."

Well, they are certainly welcome to it.

Now if we can only convince them to stop using it, unless they drill and refine it themselves!

15 posted on 07/10/2011 1:58:26 PM PDT by rawcatslyentist (It is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; ~Vattel's Law of Nations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Java4Jay
It belongs to all of the people on this planet...

What twaddle! It belongs to those who go and get it. Imagine a world where each individual had to procure his own daily energy supply. Early nineteenth century? Eighteenth?

Regards,
GtG

16 posted on 07/10/2011 2:32:57 PM PDT by Gandalf_The_Gray (I live in my own little world, I like it 'cuz they know me here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Finally! Finally! An oil company is reporting facts while putting the numbers in perspective. The chart sure helps too.


17 posted on 07/10/2011 3:47:56 PM PDT by Cobra64 (Common sense isn't common anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64

bump


18 posted on 07/10/2011 3:52:47 PM PDT by gibsosa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson