How did the babies fare?
Anybody know what percentage of takers that was, given the time frame of the study?
It’s all about greed & money.
This sounds like a job for “class action lawsuit lawyer”.
While the federal government could provide all sorts of cover to the drug maker, and would never permit a judgment against the drug, they could *not* prevent the adverse publicity from a lawsuit. So the purpose of the lawsuit should be assumed to be *just* for adverse publicity, and if the case “has legs”, that is an added bonus.
That being said, even before the lawsuit commences, which the government will probably try to black out of the news and censor, the publicity campaign should put out so much information about the victims and their suffering that it will matter less. That the government will have its perfidy known when it tries to censor, and that this will become a story in its own right.
Once the publicity about the drug is in full swing, then the lawsuit should be “shopped” to the most anti-abortion venue in the country, with judges willing to have a much broader publicity circus than a discreet and orderly hearing.
The bottom line is to get in the public mind that information that the drug is dangerous in its own right, as well as being misused, dangerously dispensed, and a public hazard.
If this were a headache remedy, the FDA would have had it pulled from pharmacy shelves already.
The pills are huge business , the abortion mills charge the same for a pill that can be bought in bulk for $10/each direct from the Chinese manufacturer as they do for a surgical procedure...