Posted on 07/12/2011 1:31:16 PM PDT by The Magical Mischief Tour
I keep this on my homepage, unfortunately it come in hand all too often.
comes in handy....oy
Someone is going to accuse you of a dirty minded Freudian slip, I just know it.
>> Taken literally thats hyperbole, <<
What you mean is “don’t take it literally, it’s only hyperbole” Or, in other words, “I figured people wouldn’t be as sympathetic to the rights of child pornographers, so I deceitfully tricked them into reading an article, knowing full well that my headline was a complete, absurd, bald-faced, ridiculous lie.”
Better, more truthful headline: “Unconstitutional proposal would coerce internet readers to help government track child pornographers.”
“We’re all government snoops, now”?
I did not say they represented the whole movement
Who said the following?
Interestingly nude photographs of kids online is not illegal, do a search.
And this...
______________________________________
Doing research?
It would attract mindless accusations exactly in line with the headline. That’s the point.
Or trolling in freepland? (How do I ping the Viking Kitties, who are never indecent because they have suits of fur?)
That’s the meat of the slightly longer quote which I was looking for. Thank you.
I'd say it was my pleasure but considering what I mistyped after the quote, I think I'll just shut up.....grrrr and lol!
Children who willingly participate in sexual acts have the right to make that decision as well, even if its distasteful to us personally...When we outlaw child pornography, the prices paid for child performers rise, increasing the incentives for parents to use children against their will.
- Libertarian Presidential Front-Runner Defends Child Porn (2008)
http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2008/04/25/libertarian-presidential-front-runner-defends-child-porn/
We call for the repeal of all laws that restrict anyone, including children, from engaging in voluntary exchanges of goods, services or information regarding human sexuality, reproduction, birth control or related medical or biological technologies.
- 2004 Libertarian Party Platform:
http://theirownwords.net/platforms/2004/Children.html
Can you tell me why a person cant get an ISP and an IP address from a company in a country that doesnt give a crap about what our ruling class says they have to do?
It would seem to me that there should be a way to bypass all U.S. ISP companies and get an onramp offshore without being offshore.
Now, first of all, I don't really want a president who vows to eliminate behaviors she disapproves of and, second, she knows she couldn't do it on First Amendment grounds so is just pandering.
Someone I perceived as an intelligent woman turned out to be a big disappointment. May her time at the top of the polls be short.
I wish they were illegal. It would certainly make things easier.
-PJ
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.