Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Congress: So, you wanna get out of Raising the Debt Limit?
self | jimjohn

Posted on 07/13/2011 10:43:34 AM PDT by jimjohn

Simply pass this bill in the House of Representatives:

Section 1:

Thirty days after the passage of this legislation, the Department of Treasury for the United States shall not be authorized to return any yield, or interest of any bonds sold thereafter, and Congress shall consider the value of any bonds sold thereafter as null and void; nor shall Congress give monetary value to any new bonds or notes printed by entities unless expressly authorized by a 2/3's vote in both the Senate and the House of Representatives.

Section 2:

All validity pubic debts incurred prior shall not questioned, and the method and means of any compensation thereof will be determined in a manner prescribed by Congress.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: debt; default; government; laws
There, debt limit problem solved.

Note: the second part of Section 1 addresses such actions as the Fed's "quantitative easing"

1 posted on 07/13/2011 10:43:40 AM PDT by jimjohn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jimjohn

Mitch McConnell thinks 1/3+1 is good enough.

Meanwhile we can’t unban lightbulbs with a majority vote.


2 posted on 07/13/2011 10:55:31 AM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimjohn

“Pubic debts”??? hee hee.


3 posted on 07/13/2011 11:03:21 AM PDT by Two Kids' Dad ((((( )))))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimjohn

Hm, interesting...
Though I’m for a Constitutional Amendment of something like this:

Section 1
The Secretary of the Treasury shall issue an account, at least once a year, of the contents of gold physically within the Treasury’s possession.

Section 2
No debt shall be assumed which would cause the total debt-obligations to exceed one-hundred ten percent of the value of the gold within the treasury.


4 posted on 07/13/2011 5:16:56 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OneWingedShark
I agree on point, but some future congress/president will run rough shot over that anyway. That's why I like a law (or amendent) actually placing a value of 0 to an un-constitutional act. This way, any idiot who would buy a U.S. bond has to know they are doing so at their own peril - since Congress or any court can say "Hey, that bond (or federal reserve note you bought has no value - so the government doesn't have to make good on it"

I figure that would scare most reasonable buyers away.

5 posted on 07/13/2011 7:55:09 PM PDT by jimjohn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jimjohn

Well, there are some other amendment-ideas I have in mind for that.
We wouldn’t want to put ALL of our amendments to the constitution into a single article which could then be nullified by a single amendment.


6 posted on 07/14/2011 7:36:28 AM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson