Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House Compares 'Cut, Cap and Balance Act' to 'Paul Ryan Plan On Steroids'
ABC News ^ | 07/19/2011 | Mary Bruce

Posted on 07/19/2011 7:34:40 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

Following the president’s veto threat this morning, senior White House officials launched a full-on assault against the Republican “Cut, Cap and Balance Act” this afternoon, describing it as “extreme, radical, and unprecedented.”

On a conference call with reporters this afternoon, White House Communications Director Dan Pfeiffer said the legislation “essentially enshrines into the constitution the Ryan plan on steroids.”

“Unless House Republicans are willing to raise revenues, significant revenues, something they have refused to do, it would require much deeper spending cuts than in the Ryan plan. This would result in even more devastating cuts to clean energy, education and health care for children and people with disabilities,” Pfeiffer said.

In addition to cutting spending in fiscal 2012 by $111 billion and capping future spending at 19.9 percent of GDP, the bill would require that a Balanced Budget Amendment be approved by Congress and sent to the states in order for the debt ceiling to be increased.

(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.abcnews.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: balancebudget; debt; debtceiling; debtlimit; demagoguery; extreme; paulryan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

1 posted on 07/19/2011 7:34:49 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Another perhaps more accurate name for the process is upping the ante. You had your chance to accept the Ryan deal. You refused. The cost of playing is now more expensive.

Better get in while you can.


2 posted on 07/19/2011 7:38:32 AM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 ....Flash mobs are trickle down leftwing REDISTRIBUTION))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
"Paul Ryan plan on steroids ...."

Thanks libs. I like the sound of that!

3 posted on 07/19/2011 7:40:34 AM PDT by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Thanks for putting it so succinctly.
I always thought the Ryan plan was a little weak.
Hopefully, this will galvanize conservatives around the CC&B - the second best plan.

Best plan is to NOT raise the debt ceiling and instead cut spending 45% immediately.


4 posted on 07/19/2011 7:44:58 AM PDT by wilco200 (11/4/08 - The Day America Jumped the Shark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The socialist White House is bound and determined to not reduce spending. The taxpayers’ wishes do not matter to this fascist cabal. The president and Cabinet and Czars are dictatorial. They have formed their own socialist party and they intend to answer only to themselves. They have insulted the courts, defied congress, and defied the voters and taxpayers.


5 posted on 07/19/2011 7:46:54 AM PDT by Rapscallion (Have you considered what is really at stake in the 2012 election? Clue: your republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

the GOP needs to respond with the Gay Men’s Penis Study and all other forms of ridiculous wasteful spending they can find.


6 posted on 07/19/2011 7:49:25 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

problem is the GOP will cower like little girls and not stand up for this bill, as they didn’t for Ryan’s bill...


7 posted on 07/19/2011 7:50:58 AM PDT by God luvs America (63.5million pay no federal income tax then vote demoKrat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Every single RAT criticizes, complains and b*tches about PUB plans. Yet, they have proposed nothing except higher taxes, more spending and continued destruction.

Where are the Tea Party Reps and Sens going to end this? I haven’t heard one word from Rand Paul, who started out so well. It is well past time for the newly elected people to start yelling back. WHERE THE HELL IS YOUR PLAN?


8 posted on 07/19/2011 7:53:16 AM PDT by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

And there’s a problem with that?????


9 posted on 07/19/2011 7:53:34 AM PDT by matginzac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Good!
This and the veto threat illustrate how desperate they are that they will end up with the hot potato.
(it was tempting to add an “e” to potato, but too many freepers wouldn’t get it)


10 posted on 07/19/2011 8:01:03 AM PDT by G Larry (I dream of a day when a man is judged by the content of his character)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Unless House Republicans are willing to raise revenues, significant revenues, something they have refused to do,

These sorry sacks of shit can not even say the word taxes.
“Raise revenues”. Just pathetic.......
Just say NO to increasing our children’s debt!


11 posted on 07/19/2011 8:04:30 AM PDT by SECURE AMERICA (Where can I sign up for the New American Revolution and the Crusades 2012?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Has McConnell raised the white flag yet?

Pray for America


12 posted on 07/19/2011 8:06:15 AM PDT by bray (Palin is the DC Nightmare)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NTHockey

according to donna...

donnabrazile Donna Brazile
President Obama has put forward a balanced approach to both spending & revenues. It’s all on the table, but the GOP wants limited cuts only.


13 posted on 07/19/2011 8:08:40 AM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
I personally don't give a rats a$$ what the boy king thinks about the Constitutional Amendment process - he doesn't have a stinkn' say in the matter.

It is interesting to note that at no point does the President have a role in the formal amendment process
14 posted on 07/19/2011 8:30:26 AM PDT by Cheerio (Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

God I couldn’t believe the homosexual penis study. The study reported that those with smaller penises had more “issues”, shall we say.

And while there is a fascination in the gay community with the functions of a penis, the key question is why in the sam hill is taxpayer money paying for this sort of study???????


15 posted on 07/19/2011 8:33:55 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: bert

Are 0BAMA and Democrats really negotiating in good faith? It seems that all Democrats and Obama do is criticize and shoot down any proposal Republicans come up with.

The Ryan plan was harsly criticized at the outset. That plan could have been a good starting point for serious discussion of the kinds of actions needed to balance a budget which is trillions out of balance. But instead, the Democrats just shoot it down, say that we’re pushing Grandma off a cliff, and have no proposals of their own.

Yep, it’s like a poker game in which we’re upping the ante. Obama told Eric Cantor not to call his bluff. It will be enlightening when everybody has to show their cards won’t it?????


16 posted on 07/19/2011 8:37:48 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

Not only that, but the Paul Ryan plan has been passed by the house for the 2012 budget and the senate and president are acting like it doesn’t exist. When they are not lying about it’s content, that is.


17 posted on 07/19/2011 8:56:18 AM PDT by ilgipper (political rhetoric is no substitute for competence (Thomas Sowell))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego
At least that study was about people, unlike the treadmill shrimp.

It's all insanity.

18 posted on 07/19/2011 9:00:30 AM PDT by newzjunkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“This would result in even more devastating cuts to clean energy,

WHICH IS NOT THE JOB OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.

“education

WHICH IS NOT THE JOB OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.

“and health care for children and people with disabilities.”

WHICH IS NOT THE JOB OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.


19 posted on 07/19/2011 9:00:53 AM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All; SeekAndFind
“extreme, radical, and unprecedented”

Their rhetoric is so stale, so tired.

We've had a budget passed from the House, we've had the Ryan plan, we've got Cut, Cap & Balance, we've got Coburn's plan... where is any Democrat plan embodied in passable legislation?

Sorry, Danny boy, but 19.9% of GDP is huge. If the federal government can't survive on $1 for every $5 dollars in the economy, it's just WAY TOO BIG.

$111 billion off a $1,500 billion deficit is hardly extreme or radical.

20 posted on 07/19/2011 9:06:49 AM PDT by newzjunkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson