Win what?
The Free Republic "Best Legs on a Candidate" Contest?
In the general election, a Sarah Palin nomination would be a Christine O'Donnell bloodbath on steroids.
Such thinking is simply delusional and flies in the face of all objective data.
=======================
=======================
=======================
=======================
=======================
FOX News Poll (February 7-9, 2011)
Question 3: I am going to read you a list of names. Tell me if you think that person would make a good President or not.
Sarah Palin:
.................YES.........NO.......DK.....Never heard of
ALL...........23%.......72%.........4%.......1%
Dem ...........7%........87%........5%.......1%
Rep ...........40%.......56%.......3%.......1%
Ind ...........25%........69%.......3%.......1%
=======================
All old data. Not at all what polls have been showing for several months now.
Here are Rasmussen poll results out today:
Palin is now leading Obama among independents. She also gets a higher percentage of the male vote than any other GOP candidate. And we’re 16 months away from the election.
Christine O’Donnell did extremely well. There were a lot of Republican candidates who did much worse.
Christine O’Donnell is a good example of being trashed by the media.
Getting the Christine treatment by the media, but there was no “Christine O’Donnell Bloodbath”
Christine lost by 16.58%
Let’s look at other races.
In Hawaii, the Republican lost by 53%
In Vermont, the Republican lost by 33%
In New York, one Republican lost by 32%
In New York, the other Republican lost by 26%
In Maryland, the Republican lost by 25%
In Oregon, the Republican lost by 18%
All bigger bloodbaths.
If Christine was in those races, she woulda done better than the candidates that did run, and she woulda taken media hits that woulda gone somewhere else.