There is no authority given in the 14th Amendment to the executive branch.
1 posted on
07/25/2011 7:59:17 AM PDT by
shield
To: shield
Then the 14th gives the President the authority to declare war and borrow money to pay for it.
Why are we paying congressmen when they have no constitutional job to do?
According to Obama and Clinton the boiled down Constitution says - The President may do what he sees fit.
2 posted on
07/25/2011 8:03:38 AM PDT by
DManA
To: shield
This is a really dumb idea.
If Obama tried this, the Supreme Court would clearly find it to be unconstitutional, after the time it took to get the issue to the Supreme Court.
That means that all of the US debt issued during the time that Obama exercised this approach would be invalid.
Talk about ruining the US AAA rating, that would surely do it.
3 posted on
07/25/2011 8:03:46 AM PDT by
LOC1
(Let's pick the best, not settle for a compromise.)
To: shield
There’s a hidden clause in the 14th amendment that says quite clearly that it is to have the opposite effect of the Magna Carta. Power is given to the King instead of taken away.
To: shield
There’s a hidden clause in the 14th amendment that says quite clearly that it is to have the opposite effect of the Magna Carta. Power is given to the King instead of taken away.
To: shield
" There are only two types of evil greed: greed for coercive power and greed for the UNEARNED. Power-lusters and looters use the term greed against producers to cover up their evil greed." - (source unknown)
7 posted on
07/25/2011 8:07:50 AM PDT by
Baynative
To: shield
And we should believe Bill Clinton as a Constitutional authority because ......
Why, exactly?
8 posted on
07/25/2011 8:08:11 AM PDT by
Izzy Dunne
(Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
To: shield
Does anyone besides me find this comment on the part of a past president a bit inappropriate? Obama should tell him to STFU with public comments.
10 posted on
07/25/2011 8:13:59 AM PDT by
blackdog
(The mystery of government is not how Washington works but how to make it stop)
To: shield
14 posted on
07/25/2011 8:20:50 AM PDT by
PLD
To: shield
26 posted on
07/25/2011 8:45:39 AM PDT by
PLD
To: shield
I guess that means Clinton would have been impeached twice.
29 posted on
07/25/2011 9:00:49 AM PDT by
Candor7
(Obama fascist info..http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html)
To: shield; All
32 posted on
07/25/2011 9:17:50 AM PDT by
potlatch
(They that sow the wind shall reap the whirlwind......)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson