Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dcwusmc
The commerce clause was intended

Where does the Constitution require the SCOTUS to rule based on "intent?" Answer: It doesn't. And anyway, your opinion means diddly. The SCOTUS gets the last word, and they've spoken. CSA is constitutional. Pass an amendment if you don't like it.

23 posted on 07/27/2011 1:00:15 PM PDT by Huck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: Huck
-- Pass an amendment if you don't like it. --

See "prohibition."

Some years later, no amendment needed to prohibit a recreational drug.

Feds credibility on this issue is below zero.

35 posted on 07/27/2011 1:38:14 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: Huck

It was the intent of the Founders, in their own words, that the Constitution be interpreted per their writings, as it was written. And so it was until the beginnings of the last century, with T. Roosevelt, W. Wilson and F.D. Roosevelt, the great socialists. So you’re saying that you agree with THEM? What would that make you, then? Surely not Conservative!


62 posted on 07/27/2011 3:49:31 PM PDT by dcwusmc (A FREE People have no sovereign save Almighty GOD!!! III OK We are EVERYWHERE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: Huck
Where does the Constitution require the SCOTUS to rule based on "intent?" Answer: It doesn't. And anyway, your opinion means diddly. The SCOTUS gets the last word, and they've spoken. CSA is constitutional. Pass an amendment if you don't like it.

Pass an amendment if you don't like the original intent of the Commerce Clause. The People have the last word, not the USSC, and not you.

88 posted on 07/28/2011 4:19:35 AM PDT by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson