Uh-huh. So when Bill writes:
“The guy Ed Hale in this story, who knew Jimbot was James Johnson two years ago, is a courageous guy.”
...it’s your contention that he was being facetious only at the beginning and end of the sentence, and that he was making an honest and explosive Declaration Against Interest in the middle part of that sentence.
And when he wrote:
“That’s how he got this story two years before Corsi. Who knows, maybe in another two years, Corsi will figure out what screen name President Obama and Michelle use on my forum.”
...you’re saying that the second sentence was a joke about White House involvement, but the first sentence was a sincere Declaration Against Interest about White House involvement.
Basically, it’s your contention that in a post where Bryan was mocking the heck out of Corsi, he was actually openly admitting that Corsi’s expose was CORRECT? And that doesn’t seem strange to you?
Do Birthers have this much trouble recognizing sarcasm in all areas of their lives, or just in the Birther-related parts?
“The guy Ed Hale in this story, who knew Jimbot was James Johnson two years ago, is a courageous guy.”
...it’s your contention that he was being facetious only at the beginning and end of the sentence, and that he was making an honest and explosive Declaration Against Interest in the middle part of that sentence.
Consistency is not a Democrat trait. Nonsense interspersed with statements of fact are a common enough occurrence involving discussions with that bunch.
“That’s how he got this story two years before Corsi. Who knows, maybe in another two years, Corsi will figure out what screen name President Obama and Michelle use on my forum.”
...you’re saying that the second sentence was a joke about White House involvement, but the first sentence was a sincere Declaration Against Interest about White House involvement.
Not at all. I'm certain that Precedent Obama slums around on his blog from time to time. He has to get his idiot ideas from somewhere. Right? I do believe I suggested that all Democrats are delusional and stupid, perhaps therein lies the answer?
Basically, it’s your contention that in a post where Bryan was mocking the heck out of Corsi, he was actually openly admitting that Corsi’s expose was CORRECT? And that doesn’t seem strange to you?
Basically it's my contention that if you are going to jerk someone around for awhile, a nonsensical and trivial topic is just as good as a sensible and important one. The topic is just the bone of contention, the real fun is in the playing of the game. :)
Do Birthers have this much trouble recognizing sarcasm in all areas of their lives, or just in the Birther-related parts?
Well, you are the friend of "bill" so I suppose you know whether he's being sarcastic or not. I can't tell with Democrats. Everything they say looks like infantile nonsense to me. And they want us to take them seriously! :)