Posted on 07/31/2011 4:40:45 PM PDT by Meet the New Boss
'There isn't much point to denial,' source says of White House-linked James A. Johnson
A radical Obama supporter who organizes an "Obama-Robot" website has admitted in online posts that WND correctly identified former chairman of Fannie Mae chairman James A. Johnson as the group's White House-associated ring-leader. William L. Bryan, who posts under the username "P.J. Foggy," is the organizer of Fogbow.com, a self described "OBOT," or "Obama-Robot" website. On his weekly "Reality Check Radio" broadcast July 21, Bryan began the show by acknowledging the veracity of the WND report.
"As far as I know [WND] got the boss," he said. "There just isn't much point to denial."
snip
As previously reported, Hale told WND he spoke with JimBot numerous times on the telephone and that JimBot insisted he was a Washington, D.C., Democratic Party insider who directed OBOT activity in the Foxbow community from his office across the street from the White House.
JimBot further told Hale that he paid as many as 100 OBOTs in a disinformation campaign aimed at people questioning Obama's eligibility to be president.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
James Johnson looted Fanny Mae for 100 million in salary same as Franklin Raines
Uh-huh. So when Bill writes:
“The guy Ed Hale in this story, who knew Jimbot was James Johnson two years ago, is a courageous guy.”
...it’s your contention that he was being facetious only at the beginning and end of the sentence, and that he was making an honest and explosive Declaration Against Interest in the middle part of that sentence.
And when he wrote:
“That’s how he got this story two years before Corsi. Who knows, maybe in another two years, Corsi will figure out what screen name President Obama and Michelle use on my forum.”
...you’re saying that the second sentence was a joke about White House involvement, but the first sentence was a sincere Declaration Against Interest about White House involvement.
Basically, it’s your contention that in a post where Bryan was mocking the heck out of Corsi, he was actually openly admitting that Corsi’s expose was CORRECT? And that doesn’t seem strange to you?
Do Birthers have this much trouble recognizing sarcasm in all areas of their lives, or just in the Birther-related parts?
I suspect you amuse everyone.
Corsi is the one who has a busted mockery detector. Parody blindness is a “birther defect”.
A Serious ailment no doubt, but not half so fatal to intellect as an inability to comprehend simple facts and probabilities.
“The guy Ed Hale in this story, who knew Jimbot was James Johnson two years ago, is a courageous guy.”
...it’s your contention that he was being facetious only at the beginning and end of the sentence, and that he was making an honest and explosive Declaration Against Interest in the middle part of that sentence.
Consistency is not a Democrat trait. Nonsense interspersed with statements of fact are a common enough occurrence involving discussions with that bunch.
“That’s how he got this story two years before Corsi. Who knows, maybe in another two years, Corsi will figure out what screen name President Obama and Michelle use on my forum.”
...you’re saying that the second sentence was a joke about White House involvement, but the first sentence was a sincere Declaration Against Interest about White House involvement.
Not at all. I'm certain that Precedent Obama slums around on his blog from time to time. He has to get his idiot ideas from somewhere. Right? I do believe I suggested that all Democrats are delusional and stupid, perhaps therein lies the answer?
Basically, it’s your contention that in a post where Bryan was mocking the heck out of Corsi, he was actually openly admitting that Corsi’s expose was CORRECT? And that doesn’t seem strange to you?
Basically it's my contention that if you are going to jerk someone around for awhile, a nonsensical and trivial topic is just as good as a sensible and important one. The topic is just the bone of contention, the real fun is in the playing of the game. :)
Do Birthers have this much trouble recognizing sarcasm in all areas of their lives, or just in the Birther-related parts?
Well, you are the friend of "bill" so I suppose you know whether he's being sarcastic or not. I can't tell with Democrats. Everything they say looks like infantile nonsense to me. And they want us to take them seriously! :)
LoL. ;-)
I believe you've given us a preview of Part Five of the series: Obama is NeonZX. I mean, that Bryan guy pretty much admitted as much already.
What if NeonZX turns out to have the first name of Mike?
I can’t wait!
I've recently been diagnosed with advanced mockery dementia. Is Mike the real name of NeonZX, or are you practicing the elusive art of sarcasm?
Although I'm no longer certain I could tell the difference, a sarcasm-free response would be appreciated.
You're spot on about them. :-)
Placemark for a good snicker tomorrow.
new id..lost password and have no idea my previous e mail id..must be the merlot...
And what is Michelle's Handle? "Kleon" perhaps?
Sarcasm free?
Ok...
Well...
Uhm...
Ah, the heck with it.
I got nuthin.
Thanks, Your observations are also quite astute. I Enjoy reading your comments.
“Is Mike the real name of NeonZX, or are you practicing the elusive art of sarcasm?”
A month or two ago, Corsi was claiming that the long-form was forged by somebody named ‘Mike.’ He said that he deduced this name from embedded clues that the forger left in the document that spelled the name ‘Mike.’
It was pure ‘face on Mars’ type crap, seeing patterns in the noise, but Corsi repeated it several times, and said that he was going to reveal Mike’s full name. Then, maybe realizing that nobody was taking that particular nonsense seriously, he stopped talking about Mike and moved on to other silly crap about White House agents paying anti-Birther web commenters.
This is clearly the sole reason that Obama was worried about the whole debt ceiling thing. If the government defaulted, then the checks to the Obot commenters would stop and the conspiracy would come crumbling down.
As the GOP has worked so hard to avoid default, this is irrefutable evidence that they too are involved in covering for Obama.
I don't think many of his readers are taking this one seriously either. The fact that he's dragging it out in a five-part series baffles me. I knew it was a slow summer in birtherland, but this is the kind of stuff that'll turn people off this theory altogether. If anything kills birtherism, it won't be something produced by the President; it will be death by the crushing weight of too many BS stories.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.