Posted on 08/04/2011 8:41:36 AM PDT by MizSterious
BTW: AAG Eric Nichols and AG Greg Abbott have made it abundantly clear that this case is NOT about religion. It is about sexual assault and aggravated sexual assault of a child.
What’s wrong with them??????
Forgiving others is very interesting - whenever we are able to forgive those who have harmed us personally, it’s like a huge iron ball and chain lifted from our hearts. It’s liberating ourselves from anger, pain, wanting others to hurt in return (revenge), the past...
It ain’t easy but it is the right thing, and it has to be real, and with God all things are possible!
What’s wrong with them??????
Who ever knows with a jury? Maybe they've heard so much since AAG Nichols presented the dates and the DNA they wanted to review it. Maybe they're in shock? But, yeah. That's pretty much the question everyone is asking on twitter. You can follow agong here:
http://twitter.com/#!/search/%23warrenjeffs
There are some pretty funny tweets.
“... any adult who knew about or helped... deserves prison time”.
I agree. I understand they charged the “leader” but that doesn’t make the crimes of the other adults less (in my opinion). Personally, I think they should have charged every adult who participated and YES... that includes the so called “Moms” who surrendered their daughters.
Hmmm... don’t know where you would get that idea.
I do have experience with people marrying very young. My Uncle was 16 and married his 14 year old girlfriend the day she turned 15. I myself married very young as well (been married 14 years to her now).
Serious question. Say you’re in TX & a 20 year old guy marries a 14 year old girl (under parental consent), then divorces her a few months later. A week after the divorce they sleep together.
—
Could he or should he be charged with, as some would put it, “Child Rape” or what legally called statutory rape?
25 year minimum.
gosanangelo GoSanAngelo.com
BREAKING: #Warrenjeffs jury has asked to hear one of audiotapes again, they are being moved to a different courtroom to listen to it
3 minutes ago
Then he married his 15 year old girlfriend.
Serious question my foot.
Your support of child rape is disgusting. It's no different than the made up scenarios that the pro-abortion movement uses to justify blanket legalizing abortion for everyone.
Did you check out the age of consent in TX as suggested?
IBTZ
The jury has asked to hear the tape and see the transcript again. The judge told them initially they could only see the transcript once.
I hope this doesn’t end up with a hung jury. But I can see at least one person saying “I can’t be sure that’s a 12 year old girl on the tape and I can’t be sure they’re actually having sex.”
Or, what if there’s a mormon or two on the jury who thinks this is persecution?
Wives of Brigham Young:
1. Miriam Works ?18
2. Mary Ann Angell 30
3. Lucy Ann Decker 20
4. Harriet Elizabeth Cook Campbell 18
5. Augusta Adams ?41
6. Clarissa Decker 15
7. Clarissa Ross 30
8. Emily Dow Partridge 20
9. Susan Snively 29
10. Olive Grey Frost 28
11. Emmeline Free ?19
12. Margaret Pierce ?22
13. Maria Lawrence
14. Ellen Rockwood ?16
15. Martha Bowker 23
16. Naamah Kendel Jenkins Carter 24
17. Zina Diantha Huntington 25
18. Louisa Beaman ?31
19. Margaret Maria Alley 20
20. Lucy Bigelow 16
21. Mary Jane Bigelow 19
22. Eliza R. Snow 45
23. Eliza Burgess ?23
24. Harriet Barney ?25
25. Harriet Amelia Folsom 24
26. Mary Van Cott 22
27. Ann Eliza Webb 23
Major understatement!
There is no transcript. The Court reporter hasn't had time to transcribe anything yet. The Judge offered to have the Court reporter read them anything of Rebecca Musser’s testimony they would like to hear. SOP.
They also want to re-listen to all 3 tapes. Understandable to me. If they were listening with head phones and someone was jumping up and down in front of them - they may have been distracted.
Re: Becky Musser’s testimony. She gave many definitions that were specific to the sect Mr. Jeffs belongs to. Perhaps this was new information to them and they want to compare the definitions she gave with the things they're hearing on the tape.
I'd call that a serious and thoughtful jury.
Where I got my information was the T.V. show In Session. The tape of him raping the little girl while other people were present also had a transcript for the jury to follow along with. That’s the only tape that had a transcript and that’s the one the jury wants to listen to again. Again, according to In Session.
There is one piece of evidence that should convict him and that is DNA proving he fathered a child with a 14 year old. They don’t need a tape.
There is a transcript of at least ONE of the audio tapes. There was testimony about how long it took to get it transcribed (Over 5 hours).
The jury wasnts to hear all 3 audio tapes plus review part of the Musser testimony (I’m thinking it is the ‘get close’ part).
I hope this guy gets his due. If he walks nobody will ever have the courage to break away from this creep.
But first they're going to lunch.
How they can even eat is beyond me.
Me too.
HLN is reporting there is a verdict. This is good. I think.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.