Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama's soft response to Tea Party draws liberal criticism
The Hill ^

Posted on 08/06/2011 5:08:55 PM PDT by Sub-Driver

Obama's soft response to Tea Party draws liberal criticism By Alexander Bolton - 08/06/11 07:15 PM ET

Liberals are growing frustrated with President Obama’s soft response to the Tea Party after fractious negotiations over the debt limit led to the loss of nation’s AAA credit rating on Friday.

Republicans and Democrats have unleashed fusillades of attack against each other in the wake of the announcement but Obama has stayed quiet, frustrating his party’s base.

“It’s hard to see how we avoid a Tea-Party recession if the president who has the biggest megaphone in the country is not willing to speak clearly on the issue,” Justin Ruben, executive director of MoveOn.org, told The Hill in a Saturday afternoon interview.

Ruben said Obama should never have allowed Tea-Party lawmakers in the House to treat a debt-limit extension as a concession to Democrats given the nation’s entire economy depended on it.

By accepting the threat of a national default as politically valid, Obama put himself at a major disadvantage in the talks, he said.

“It’s a terrible deal that will destroy jobs and big part of reason is because president accepted the premise that it was okay to hold economy hostage,” Ruben said. “Instead of saying, 'this is outrageous' and ‘You will not threaten the full faith and credit of the U.S.,’ and telling America what the Republicans are doing, he sat down and said, 'let’s bargain' and tried to show he was more reasonable.”

Reuben said a potential default should have never been within the parameters of the debate.

“That table should not have existed,” he said.

Liberal activists were instrumental to Obama beating Hillary Clinton in the caucus states — which require more opportunities for face-to-face persuasion than larger states — during the 2008 Democratic presidential primary.

MoveOn.org endorsed Obama on Feb. 1, 2008, shortly before Super Tuesday, a crucial round of balloting.

Obama won the nomination by racking up wins — often by large margins — in smaller states with caucus systems, such as Iowa, Colorado, Idaho, Minnesota, North Dakota and Nebraska. Clinton captured large states with primaries such as California, Ohio, New York, Pennsylvania and Texas.

The president has been careful not to blame the Tea Party for the nation’s credit downgrade even though many Democrats and some independent political experts think he could make a strong case.

“The President believes it is important that our elected leaders come together to strengthen our economy and put our nation on a stronger fiscal footing,” said White House press secretary Jay Carney in a statement that seemed anodyne compared to the remarks of GOP presidential candidates and lawmakers.

“The bipartisan compromise on deficit reduction was an important step in the right direction. Yet, the path to getting there took too long and was at times too divisive. We must do better to make clear our nation’s will, capacity and commitment to work together to tackle our major fiscal and economic challenges,” Carney said.

This type of response has led some of the president’s supporters to think that he is bringing a plate of muffins to a street brawl.

Republican presidential candidates Mitt Romney and Michele Bachmann led the attack against Obama on Friday night.

“America’s creditworthiness just became the latest casualty in President Obama’s failed record of leadership on the economy,” Romney said in statement. “His failed policies have led to high unemployment, skyrocketing deficits, and now, the unprecedented loss of our nation’s prized AAA credit rating.”

Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.), who is vying to win the Iowa Republican caucus next year, turned up the rhetoric even higher.

“This president has destroyed the credit rating of the United States through failed economic policies and his inability to control government spending by raising the debt ceiling,” she said. “President Obama is destroying the foundation’s of our economy one beam at a time.”

Bachmann voted against the final debt deal, as well as the Speaker John Boehner's (R-Ohio) proposal. She also accused the Obama administration of "scare tactics" for warning about a possible U.S. default if no action were taken.

Obama may be trying to neutralize the acid partisan environment in Washington, which Standard & Poor’s cited in its decision to downgrade the U.S.

“We have changed our view of the difficulties in bridging the gulf between the political parties over fiscal policy, which makes us pessimistic about the capacity of Congress and the Administration to be able to leverage their agreement this week into a broader fiscal consolidation plan that stabilizes the government's debt dynamics anytime soon,” Standard & Poor’s wrote in its overview.

Ross K. Baker, a political science professor at Rutgers University, who has studied Congress throughout his career and served fellowships in the Senate, said he thinks the Tea Party is more responsible for standoff that led to Friday’s downgrade.

“I think they shoulder a major responsibility for the blame. They set the agenda,” Baker said. "The advent of such a large number of house members endorsed by the Tea Party made sure that budget cutting was going to be on the advantage. They pressed their advantage beyond which a point compromise was possible."

Baker characterized the president’s pushback against the Tea Party as lacking muscle.

“The president has to put some muscle in his rhetoric and go after the Tea Party as home wreckers. I think the president in following his own precept in being a conciliator. It’s great and quite noble but he’s in a situation in which he really has to stand up for things in which he believes,” Baker said.

Democratic senators did not think Obama used his bully pulpit effectively to set up the negotiations.

Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-N.J.) told The Hill at the end of June “the leadership has to be more outspoken and make the case.”

“This is the biggest courtroom in the world, and you can’t get a verdict that is positive without making the argument,” he said.

They were more critical when speaking on condition of anonymity.

House Democratic leaders did not follow Obama’s example in reacting to Standard & Poor’s downgrading, placing blame squarely on Tea Party Republicans.

"The American people need the Republicans to stop their reckless and irresponsible political games that led to this unfortunate downgrade,” said House Assistant Democratic Leader James Clyburn (S.C.). “They have repeatedly walked away from the negotiating table whenever the two sides got close to a balanced blend of both spending cuts and revenue raisers.”

Rep. Steve Israel (N.Y.), chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, said: "The indisputable fact is that until this group of Roadblock Republicans forced Speaker Boehner to walk away from a deal, America never came to the brink of a default and we never experienced a downgrade. This downgrade is the direct result of Roadblock Republicans."


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: enemedia; leftganda; leftuniverse; obamaganda; teapartyterrorists; thehill
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
To: Sub-Driver

“Liberals are growing frustrated with President Obama’s soft response to the Tea Party after fractious negotiations over the debt limit led to the loss of nation’s AAA credit rating on Friday. “

Sorry, couldn’t get any farther than this. Negotiations led to the loss of the nation’s AAA rating. Aholes.


41 posted on 08/06/2011 5:54:09 PM PDT by Chaguito
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Well, it seems Obamajaad knew he was deep six into getting nothing passed at all because the Tea Party was having none of it. And he knows he lucky to get what he did.

Although I have no faith nor give any credit to the piece of fluff bill that allows $4.5 trillion more spending with a promise to cut future spending, which makes no sense at all to a sane person. Especially since your current spending is over $1 trillion more than your income.

The liberals sure are in a snit aren’t they. Wait until they get a load of 2012 and we send another 70-80 of their behinds to the unemployment line.


42 posted on 08/06/2011 5:55:50 PM PDT by RowdyFFC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: toddausauras

They ARE. They are insane. They are scared crapless by the idea of conservative media but they slurp up the liberal agenda.

They live in a bubble and not one made of common sense.

The same liberals who, if they could get their socialists elected, would be calling them “heroes” are demonizing the people who are standing on principle on the right.

And they are calling us “terrorists”.

If we really want to think about our nation. Our DIVERSE and special nation...we need to do things that people won’t like. Halt immigration. Curb foreign aid. Make other nations feel our pain.


43 posted on 08/06/2011 5:56:57 PM PDT by Winstons Julia (when liberals rant, it's called free speech; when conservatives vent, it's called hate speech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: mylife

Sad but true!

When a President is failing he usually goes to war to boost his #’s. He has already lost in Libya for the most part, funny how the media covers his ass with propaganda.

Scary as hell, China chasing our spy plane across international boarders. China needs the oil from the middle east, bad enough to fight for it.

Sorry I’m old school, 1+1=2. Long term our stupid government will get into a big war, to solve the problem. But the credit card is already maxed.

I moved out of Oregon a year ago because of this (the liberal minded drug culture didn’t help), back to the mid-west.

I really hope that I am wrong!


44 posted on 08/06/2011 6:07:59 PM PDT by foundedonpurpose (Be strong in truth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

The downgrade is the result of the debt not the deal.


45 posted on 08/06/2011 6:13:37 PM PDT by goldfinch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: foundedonpurpose

I tried to go to WA state back in the late 80’s.
I’m kinda glad that didn’t work out.
The Liberal drugtard culture was already entrenched.

I can see a retreat to the Midwest in my future.
Lord knows it’s due for a resurgence.


46 posted on 08/06/2011 6:14:40 PM PDT by mylife (OPINIONS ~ $ 1.00 HALFBAKED ~ 50c)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: comebacknewt

they have been reasonably successful at demonizing us- primarily because the average GOP in power refuses to grow a pair and stand up to point out the criticism...


47 posted on 08/06/2011 6:14:46 PM PDT by God luvs America (63.5million pay no federal income tax then vote demoKrat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Farmer Dean

WTF? Just how did the Tea Party cause this depression?


48 posted on 08/06/2011 6:14:57 PM PDT by doc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: foundedonpurpose

BTW
Obama is going to meet major trouble in Ohio in 2012


49 posted on 08/06/2011 6:16:36 PM PDT by mylife (OPINIONS ~ $ 1.00 HALFBAKED ~ 50c)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Know what else Obama inherited from Bush......

A AAA RATING!


50 posted on 08/06/2011 6:16:54 PM PDT by hapnHal (hapnHal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver; All
Liberals are growing frustrated with President Obama’s soft response to the Tea Party after fractious negotiations over the debt limit led to the loss of nation’s AAA credit rating on Friday.

so if the Tea Party had not stood its ground would the rating now be lower??? probably considering the Hill reported earlier today S&P's downgrade had more to do with the lack of cuts vs. a lack of revenue: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2759575/posts

51 posted on 08/06/2011 6:18:17 PM PDT by God luvs America (63.5million pay no federal income tax then vote demoKrat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Professor Baker I hate to inform you but the Tea Party had nothing to do with this depression. How about out of control government spending, raising our debt to the point of no return, expanding the ferderal payroll with unrealistic benefits and pension plans, job killing laws enacted by the Democrats, failure to explore more drilling for energy whild giving Brazil 3 billion dollars to do their own off shore drilling, just to name a few reason Professor dip sh*t!


52 posted on 08/06/2011 6:30:48 PM PDT by doc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Liberals are growing frustrated with President Obama’s soft response to the Tea Party after fractious negotiations over the debt limit led to the loss of nation’s AAA credit rating on Friday.

That lead represents ten pounds of bias in a five-pound bag.

An objective and professional journalist would be ashamed of a complete misrepresentation like that.

But, in today's MSM, that gets a high five from the editor.

Cretins.

53 posted on 08/06/2011 6:55:40 PM PDT by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance On Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

a ‘tea party recession’... what (bleeps).


54 posted on 08/06/2011 7:04:06 PM PDT by Pikachu_Dad (Impeach Sen Quinn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txrangerette

Great point!


55 posted on 08/06/2011 7:11:37 PM PDT by toddausauras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

He said “Tea Party recession”? These people are absolute idiots. They’re blaming the Tea Party? The Tea Party candidates have only been in office for about 7 months. Prior to that Obama had overwhelming majorities in both houses of Congress. They had free reign for 2 solid years and jammed all of their liberal crap like Obamacare down our throats. But they blame the Tea Party for this mess that THEY created? Lying idiots!!


56 posted on 08/06/2011 7:32:28 PM PDT by abcc2011 (Christian and conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

I watched the S&P guy on Cavuto twice today. He did say that the fact that we came within one day of not solving the current issue factored into their decision but the problem wouldn’t be a problem if Congress had agreed on cutting 4T of spending. He specifically mentioned the Ryan plan, the POTUS referring to 4T in one of his speeches, and I believe Boehner mentioning 4T. Of course, the cuts we eventually were pathetic.

In the end did the GOP just figure the rats were walking into a giant trap they brought on themselves - not to mention the rest of us?


57 posted on 08/06/2011 7:33:52 PM PDT by Aria ( "If we ever forget that we're one nation under God, then we will be a nation gone under.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Obama and the Democrats kept up the drum-beat that if we didn’t raise the debt ceiling by August 2nd, our rating would be lowered. And Boner and the house bought it.


58 posted on 08/06/2011 7:44:23 PM PDT by tumblindice (`No one's life, liberty or property is safe while Congress is in session.' MT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
TEA PARTY RECESSION???

Well, gag me with a spoon. That commie author couldn't hit a water buffalo in the a$$ with a bag of rice.

59 posted on 08/06/2011 8:03:19 PM PDT by CanaGuy (P.M. Steven Harper: We gave you a majority, now get busy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Ohhhhh, so if they had just raised the debt ceiling without any other considerations (which is what Obama wanted), then everything would have been fine? Riiiiiiiiiiight. Making even a feeble, less than half-hearted attempt at fiscal sanity is the real problem! That’s really the line they are going to take on this. It would take a really stupid party to lose to them............................ so I am pretty concerned.


60 posted on 08/06/2011 8:39:15 PM PDT by cdcdawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson