Nanny State PING!
Posted on 08/09/2011 7:11:05 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Nanny State PING!
If those words do not cry out for ridding ourselves of the ruling class, then no words do. 2012 cannot come soon enough.
It’s the same logic that said, “we have to elect Obama before we can find out what he’s like.”
How many pages is the US tax code... and growing?
The states need to send 25 divisions to Washington so obuma can find out what their intention is.
The most infamous words uttered in a hell of long time. It had multitudes of hidden meanings. Alarm bells should have gone off nation wide. The MSM managed to silence the alarms and suppress the hidden massages. The houses of government pile drove the bill through makingoffers to key reluctant legislators offers they couldn't refuse. This is Democracy? No, it is tyranny and should be labeled as such, and set a a constant reminder.
Repeal ObamaCommieCare. Shutter HHS as totally unconstitutional.
Talk about a steaming pile of $h!t and there ain’t no diamonds in it either except for the ruling elite.
This is beyond government. And this is beyond what the public wants.
Government has to have limits. The government thinks in terms of limits for everything but itself.
Reverse all that only the sky is the limit.
So many of us already knew, yet we saw voters sleep walk to the polls to vote for a program of "America in Retrograde" I hope they enjoy the radical transformation that is spreading like wild fire.
FUBO!
Looks like the block diagram for an ARM11
“The individual mandate takes effect in 2014.”
They will be putting me in jail.
What’s the status of the court challenge to the individual mandate??? I haven’t heard anything lately.
Yes.
I’ve heard comparisons of Barack “Fitzgerald” Obamo to Jimmy Carter. That’s unfair. At least Carter earned his Nobel Peace Prize by getting Egypt and Israel to sign a peace treaty. Obama got a prize from the panel for not being George W. Bush. Obama is not worthy to carry Carter’s jock strap.
When he is gone next year his only legacy will be deficits, downgrades...but at least there will be ugly pictures on cigarette packs and calorie counts on every menu. It will be like a tattoo to remind us of the consequences of liberalism.
Neither have I. Hope it’s on the way to the Supremes.
MALFEASANCE :
...official misconduct noun criminal conduct by a public official, criminal conduct by an administration's member, dereliction of performance in office, deviation from rectitude, dishonest management, failing to uphold a sworn oath of office, failure in office, guilty act while a public official, illegal act, illegality by a public official, improper conduct by a public official, impropriety by a public official, maladministration by a public servant, malfeasance by a public servant, misadministration by a public servant, misconduct by a public official, misdeeds by a public official, misfeasance by a public official, misgovernment, misguidance by a public official, mismanagement by an office holder, misprision by an office holder, nonfeasance by an office holder, offenses while in office, transgressions by an office holder, turpitude by an office holder, wrongdoing, by a public official...
The only remaining questions are, who has standing to bring charges of malfeasance...?
and... Is there a statute of limitations?
We certainly don't wand to allow the criminals who took the money and ran to get off scott free (Rangell comes to mind...)
This one has always struck me as blatant fraud in word if not in deed.
Regardless of how one feels about pre-existing conditions, you can't have the words "insurance" and "pre-existing conditions" in the same sentence, as this constitutes fraud, plain and simple.
That's like legislating the assertion that the Emperor Hussein actually IS wearing clothes.
Absurd.
But I still have no idea who has standing to prosecute this fraud.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.