Posted on 08/10/2011 6:55:41 AM PDT by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
...As they say, “You don’t have the need to know.” That means cover-up...
...BTW, not to put down “elite” units, but, any military loss of life is a tragedy...
WHY was not an airstrike (from fast movers, apache helos, cruise missiles, or drones) used in the 1st place, rather than rely on using the SEALS as a “Rapid Response Team” to help out the Army who though were under fire, had not (as reported) suffered any casualties.
______________________________
Great question. I have wondered the same thing. Pure speculation on my part but I am guessing the Rules of Engagement have changed to an extreme point where they are more afraid of one “civilian” casualty than they are of losing a helicopter flying at low altitude from a lucky shot.
Hell of a way to fight a war. The Taliban routinely use civilians to shield them from airstrikes. We never learn.
I’m hoping that this is the military disappearing their best men in order to use them while Obama is still president.
Of course, it would be best served if they suddenly reappeared right before Obama’s impeachment.
I think that the theories of “conspiracy” are probably stretched. Here is why:
If you were a Taliban soldier, some of whom have been fighting “invaders” since I was a boy you would begin to pick up on the tactics of your enemy.
As a guerrilla warrior you would know where the troops are being dispatched from. Would you not set a person up to watch the airfield?
When you attack a group with overwhelming force, they in turn would call for help. Your person watching the airfield (or the entrances to the valley) would call and let you know when the chopper is coming. That would give you pretty decent time to prepare for the arrival in a choke point.
And, then its a lucky shot.
If you think like an insurgent, it seems pretty straightforward.
What you cannot do is make the assumption that these fighters are stupid. Poor does not equate to stupid.
They seemed pretty smart when they were knocking USSR choppers out of the air.
I hate that our guys are dead, and I hate that they sent in so many on a chopper. But I think the simplest answer is usually the most likely to be correct.
Keen insight.
I have wondered that myself.
When I was a young Platoon Leader, I was sure that my platoon could defeat the entire Warsaw Pact. Some old guys wearing combat patches shamed me into realizing that my Soldier’s lives were more important and that the US taxpayers had spent a good deal of money to provide me with things to help me like artillery and helicopters and engineers. If I was in a shooting match, I’d be calling for all the support I could get. I’m not sure that it’s a good idea to put everyone on one helicopter, but two helicopters provides twice as many targets.
I’m no expert, but would tend to agree. This would seem to be a Rangers / Marines type mission, not a SEAL mission.
The question remains, where they sacrificed because of the political exploitation related to the UBL mission?
You know, you are probably correct in your well-thought out post.
It really speaks volumes to the level of crap that we are experiencing right now, where so many of us out here (myself included) have to the very first thought cross our minds that this assclown in charge set up our own boys to get whacked. And what’s REALLY horrible is that it’s an entirely plausible and believable scenario, knowing his background, the backgrounds of his comrades, and who he was raised by and who he hung out with all his life.
What an effed up state of affairs we’ve come to.
God rest the souls of those warriors, and grant their families some measure of peace.
“Enemies Foreign and Domestic”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.