Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China's first aircraft carrier starts sea trial: Xinhua
AFP via Breitbart ^ | 9 August 2011 | Unknown

Posted on 08/10/2011 9:09:25 AM PDT by LSUfan

China's first aircraft carrier on Wednesday left its shipyard in the country's northeast to start its first sea trial, the state news agency Xinhua said. The revamped old Soviet ship's sea trial was in line with the schedule of its refitting project and would not take long, the news agency said, quoting military sources.

After returning from the trial, the carrier will continue its refit and test work, the report said, adding that the vessel had set sail from its shipyard in the city of Dalian.

Beijing last month sought to downplay the capability of its first aircraft carrier, saying the vessel would be used for training and "research", amid concerns over the country's military build-up.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: chicoms; china; navy; redchina
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

1 posted on 08/10/2011 9:09:28 AM PDT by LSUfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LSUfan

I pray this thing is the POS I think it is.

About our only hope left is that we can stop china from projecting power into this hemisphere

India should have 3 carriers up and running soon.
We cant trust them but they can hold china at bay if all goes well.


2 posted on 08/10/2011 9:13:08 AM PDT by mylife (OPINIONS ~ $ 1.00 HALFBAKED ~ 50c)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LSUfan

3 posted on 08/10/2011 9:13:34 AM PDT by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LSUfan
"China's first aircraft carrier, the former Soviet carrier Varyag"

When does it start leaking radiation?

4 posted on 08/10/2011 9:14:57 AM PDT by americanophile ("this absurd theology of an immoral Bedouin, is a rotting corpse which poisons our lives" - Ataturk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine

It looks like a major POS, but dont discount the chinese.

Remember, the missile that smoked Israels flag ship off Lebanon was made in China


5 posted on 08/10/2011 9:17:20 AM PDT by mylife (OPINIONS ~ $ 1.00 HALFBAKED ~ 50c)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: americanophile

It isn’t a CVN. Might leak oil, though.


6 posted on 08/10/2011 9:17:52 AM PDT by Little Ray (Best Conservative in the Primary; AGAINST Obama in the General.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: LSUfan

This flattop will serve the Chicoms well as a training ship. It will get them accustomed to conducting carrier ops, which they will then be able to apply when they buy a bunch of our Nimitz class ships at 0bama’s “American Military Going Out of Business Sale.”

Come on down! Prices slashed so low on high-quality military hardware you’ll think we’re crazy! Everything must go!


7 posted on 08/10/2011 9:19:18 AM PDT by henkster (The Federal Reserve is the enabling housewife to an alcoholic husband.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mylife

Didn’t sink it. It detonated short of the ship and did damage.
Another one missed completely and got a freighter.


8 posted on 08/10/2011 9:19:55 AM PDT by Little Ray (Best Conservative in the Primary; AGAINST Obama in the General.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mylife

I hate incomplete sentences.

“About our only hope left is that we can stop china from projecting power into this hemisphere...UNTIL WE ARE RID OF OBOZO AND HIS WRECKING CREW IN 2013.”

There, I fixed it!


9 posted on 08/10/2011 9:19:55 AM PDT by Dick Bachert (The 2012 election is coming. Seems we have MORE TRASH TO REMOVE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: americanophile

It didnt have engines when Russia sold it.

It could be running on rice for all we know.


10 posted on 08/10/2011 9:20:57 AM PDT by mylife (OPINIONS ~ $ 1.00 HALFBAKED ~ 50c)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray

That’s not the way I recall it going down, but I could be wrong.

IMHO the chinese SUCK. but they copy shit well and they sure know how to whip up nationalism.


11 posted on 08/10/2011 9:24:02 AM PDT by mylife (OPINIONS ~ $ 1.00 HALFBAKED ~ 50c)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mylife

Well, we’ll find out soon enough!

Personally, I’m sort of surprised they’re going with manned aircraft and CVs and not leapfrogging us to go for UCAVs and their support vessels.


12 posted on 08/10/2011 9:44:42 AM PDT by Little Ray (Best Conservative in the Primary; AGAINST Obama in the General.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: LSUfan
Beijing last month sought to downplay the capability of its first aircraft carrier, saying the vessel would be used for training and "research", amid concerns over the country's military build-up.

The Langley wasn't much of a ship, but the experience gained on her meant that the following Lexington and Yorktown classes were some of the best pre war carriers in the world. China is showing patience and intelligence by starting cheap (purchased and refit a hulk rather than building from scratch) to gain experience. Once they have that experience they can design a ship that fills the needs of their fleet.

I would much rather prefer an enemy, like Iran, who wastes money and effort in over the top propaganda driven expenditures that never actually work. China scares me because they are taking their time and doing everything low key. They have money, patience, and manufacturing power. Worst of all it appears they have a plan.
13 posted on 08/10/2011 9:46:11 AM PDT by GonzoGOP (There are millions of paranoid people in the world and they are all out to get me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LSUfan

Like Bill Whittle said on PJTV, [naval aviation] it ain’t as easy as it looks. Only two nations, the US and Japan, ever did naval aviation right. And it’s not just the carrier; there’s a whole support system of AWACS, choppers, defense, tankers, repair ships, frigates, and anti-submarine force that needs to be deployed along with the carrier. Took us decades to get it right. China probably doesn’t know what they’re doing.


14 posted on 08/10/2011 10:07:35 AM PDT by Clock King (Ellisworth Toohey was right: My head's gonna explode.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GonzoGOP

The Chinese lied about this carrier when they bought it from the Ukraine. There was a clause in the purchase contract that clearly stated that they were NOT to use this ship for military purposes. In fact the Chinese claimed they were going to make a floating casino out of it. Just saying.


15 posted on 08/10/2011 10:15:01 AM PDT by Rooivalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Clock King
"...China probably doesn’t know what they’re doing."

You got that right. If you notice the deck of this carrier of theirs there is no non-slip coating like on American carriers. This means spilled fuel and other fluids from handling aircraft on the deck will make that deck a very dangerous place. This should prove interesting.
16 posted on 08/10/2011 10:21:22 AM PDT by Rooivalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: LSUfan

One thing that China AND Russia have NEVER been able to counteract is CORROSIAN! That will EAT their ships and Airplanes ALIVE! Give ‘em about 5 years and the a/c will start falling out of the air.


17 posted on 08/10/2011 10:27:53 AM PDT by US Navy Vet (Go Packers! Go Rockies! Go Boston Bruins! See, I'm "Diverse"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet

Isn’t corrosion more a problem of MAINTENANCE?


18 posted on 08/10/2011 10:30:18 AM PDT by tcrlaf (PREFRONTAL LOBOTOMISTS FOR OBAMA2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray

Especially if a US made torpedo breaches her hull.


19 posted on 08/10/2011 10:31:26 AM PDT by NCC-1701 (In Memphis on January 20, 2009, pump price were $1.49. We all know what happened after that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Rooivalk

I think that was a different carrier.


20 posted on 08/10/2011 10:34:25 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson