Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US seeks transparency on China's first aircraft carrier
Indo-Asian News Service (IANS) ^ | Aug 11, 2011

Posted on 08/10/2011 8:49:53 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

US seeks transparency on China's first aircraft carrier

IANS | Aug 11, 2011, 06.20AM IST

WASHINGTON: The US is worried by the lack of transparency about China's first aircraft carrier, which made its maiden voyage on Wednesday, the US state department has stated.

"We want to see more transparency. We would welcome any kind of explanation that China would like to give for needing this kind of equipment," said US state department Victoria Nuland.

"This is part of our larger concern that China is not as transparent as other countries. It's not as transparent as the United States about its military acquisitions, about its military budget," she added. "And this causes concern."

China bought the Admiral Kuznetsov-class aircraft carrier, originally built in the Soviet Union and named Varyag, from Ukraine for $20 million in 1998. Before being sold, the ship was disarmed and its engines were removed.

The 1,000-feet vessel is designed to carry 26 planes and 24 helicopters and be equipped with Soviet-designed AK-630 and CADS-N-1 Kashtan close-in weapon systems, P-700 Granit anti-ship cruise missiles, Tor short-range surface-to-air missile systems and UDAV-1 anti-submarine weapon systems.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aerospace; aircraftcarrier; china; navair; pacific
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

1 posted on 08/10/2011 8:49:59 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: magslinger; Vroomfondel; SC Swamp Fox; Fred Hayek; NY Attitude; P3_Acoustic; investigateworld; ...
SONOBUOY PING!

Click on pic for past Navair pings.

Post or FReepmail me if you wish to be enlisted in or discharged from the Navair Pinglist.
The only requirement for inclusion in the Navair Pinglist is an interest in Naval Aviation.
This is a medium to low volume pinglist.

2 posted on 08/10/2011 8:52:13 PM PDT by Vroomfondel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Our State Dept. is laughable, just what kind of
transparency do they expect to get?


3 posted on 08/10/2011 8:53:09 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

whatta supid government.


4 posted on 08/10/2011 8:53:26 PM PDT by ken21 (ruling class dem + rino progressives -- destroying america for 150 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Why would any country want to have “transparency” of their military weapons with a potential enemy? This is insane.


5 posted on 08/10/2011 8:54:12 PM PDT by Prokopton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

I can see the commies “larfing and sarring, wee vee arse transparent arse Obama.”


6 posted on 08/10/2011 8:55:10 PM PDT by FreeAtlanta (Fight for Liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
"We want to see more transparency. We would welcome any kind of explanation that China would like to give for needing this kind of equipment," said US state department Victoria Nuland.

"We want to see more transparency. We would welcome any kind of explanation that the US would like to give for needing this kind of deficit spending," said China's foreign ministry.

7 posted on 08/10/2011 8:55:48 PM PDT by DTogo (High time to bring back the Sons of Liberty !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

LOL

Whose business is it of yours?

They want to build a carrier fine.....

We can still blow it up.

Instant stimulus.


8 posted on 08/10/2011 8:58:33 PM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously, you won't live through it anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Our enemies are building weapons and the fags in our State Dept. want transparency? Is this for real? These people are naive dopes. No wonder the Chinamen laugh at us.


9 posted on 08/10/2011 9:00:21 PM PDT by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tet68

Hey, they have to say something...

I just want to see some more pics of the ship at sea!


10 posted on 08/10/2011 9:01:11 PM PDT by Ronin (Obamanation has replaced Bizarroworld as the most twisted place in the universe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DTogo
"We want to see more transparency. We would welcome any kind of explanation that the US would like to give for needing this kind of deficit spending," said China's foreign ministry.

You know, I'd go right along with the Chinese foreign ministry and like to see that kind of transparency on the deficit spending as well!

11 posted on 08/10/2011 9:05:01 PM PDT by FromTheSidelines ("everything that deceives, also enchants" - Plato)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
If I was China, I would respond with, “Our Aircraft Carrier is to be used as a mobile platform to launch aircraft,” Theres your transparency. What a bunch of idiots we have in charge.
12 posted on 08/10/2011 9:05:53 PM PDT by Husker24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

What is China’s strength. Army numbers. This is just them playing with our stupid, inept bureacracy. Looky here, we have a carrier or two.
Give Japan China’s resources and I’d be worried. Very worried.
China is a perpetual implosion of infighting. They’ll get slaughtered at sea. They’ll slaughter you on land just by numbers.


13 posted on 08/10/2011 9:06:00 PM PDT by TwoSwords (The Lord is a man of war, Exodus 15:3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tet68

They could try using Wikipedia


14 posted on 08/10/2011 9:10:23 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy (New gets old. Steampunk is always cool)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TwoSwords

Logistics make me very unworried about the Chinese engaging in military action with us.


15 posted on 08/10/2011 9:14:14 PM PDT by rjeffries
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
“”We want to see more transparency. We would welcome any kind of explanation that China would like to give for needing this kind of equipment,” said US state department Victoria Nuland.

“This is part of our larger concern that China is not as transparent as other countries. It's not as transparent as the United States about its military acquisitions, about its military budget,” she added. “And this causes concern.”

Just read this garbage. We have elected a bunch of 18 year olds to run our country. This sounds like talk one would hear naive high school kids would be using while sitting around in someones basement.

They are completely clueless about how the world works. They think a country like China would care about “being transparent”.

Maybe a beer summit would let them rethink things. Then they could turn their new carrier into a peace museum. With a low carbon footprint. The gift shop would sell cruelty free cosmetics and be completely green.

16 posted on 08/10/2011 9:19:13 PM PDT by HereInTheHeartland (I love how the FR spellchecker doesn't recognize the word "Obama")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: sukhoi-30mki

What transparaency?.. Give them the plans to the new Gerald Ford class carriers.. because they are our ALLY?..

Maybe we are commies now too...
This White House is like a twilight zone administration..
Hyperbole does not come close to describing it..

Uncle Sam got something nasty on his shoe when he elected this idiot.. as president..


18 posted on 08/10/2011 9:30:14 PM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HereInTheHeartland

Pretty astounding naivete isn’t it?

Do we have to wait for an election to rid our country of this festering sore and his little friends?

Lord be with us please, at least some of us.


19 posted on 08/10/2011 9:31:17 PM PDT by Sequoyah101 (Half the people are below average.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: rjeffries

Europe will eventually have to face China on land and Europe will lose. Chinese are a lot tougher than Europeans. Loot and slaves are irresistable.


20 posted on 08/10/2011 9:37:58 PM PDT by TwoSwords (The Lord is a man of war, Exodus 15:3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson