Perhaps we should remind ourselves of how many billions go into “shrimp on treadmills,” climate change, innumerable “art-f*rt” waste-ola, etc., when we might better direct our funding to folks with a real education and real accomplishments who actually have a non-zero chance of improving the human condition.
More bucks to cancer research would be nice.
And spend a few extra bucks to shoot those arts idiots who insist on covering bridges, etc with sheets and other examples of their non talent.
These days junk DNA is referred to more respectfully as noncoding DNA, and researchers are finding clues that pseudogenes lurking within this dark region may play a role in cancer.
Sounds a little like a certain type of hacking attack.
Kinda surprised to see this come out of the Times. It actually carries an air of objectivity.
2% of the genome.
Hmm that’s curiously close to the percentage of cancer donations that actually go to research!
The vast majority of the rest goes to soliciting more research dollars, while the head of the Canadian Cancer Agency brings home over $5 million per year.
I wonder what his charitable donations look like...
'Late' asthma research unearths potential new treatment
'Good' prion-like proteins boost immune response, UT Southwestern scientists report
U of Minnesota researchers discover a natural food preservative that kills food-borne bacteria
FReepmail me if you want on or off my health and science ping list.
bfl