And kudos to TimberCreek B&B for their staunch stance against the sodomites. We need more people and businesses like this in society.
It’s sad that the queers are going to eventually put these places out of business.
So much for private property rights and freedom of association. I don’t know why we bother with the Constitution any more. Nobody pays any attention to it.
And what of civil property rights????????????????????????????????????????
There are several sides in this battle: good, misguided, and evil. The thugs filing this lawsuit have stepped across the line from merely misguided to extreme evil. Legally, the right to the free exercise of religion is protected by the First Amendment. Morally, that right is God-given, which places it on a higher plane than whatever commands might be issued by a judge with delusions of grandeur. Personally, my property is mine, and I would rather burn everything I own to the ground than pay these parasites in the event that they win in court. I would not under any circumstances allow my assets to be transferred to anyone launching a frivolous or immoral lawsuit. I’m almost invariably polite, but I would make an exception for these people, perhaps with a comment on how I hoped AIDS would bring them what they deserve - soon. It’s not true; I hope they find God and repent of their sinful actions, but spite would likely get the best of me if I were in the position of the facility owners.
The place, TimberCreek B&B in Paxto, is a bed and breakfast with 6 guest accommodations, probably the innkeepers home.
These Twinkies probably knew the position of the innkeeper and chose to harass the owner of that tiny place.
“TimberCreek, was more emphatic in its denial. An e-mail reply from Jim Walder stated: “We will never host same-sex civil unions. We will never host same-sex weddings even if they become legal in Illinois. We believe homosexuality is wrong and unnatural based on what the Bible says about it. If that is discrimination, I guess we unfortunately discriminate.””
And you just set yourself up to be sued.
You may as well just write that big check and don’t even bother with lawyers who will end up taking the rest of your cash and property.
So the State Dept. Is going after two private businesses because they don’t perform civil union ceremonies? Sound about right?
Whatever happened to “We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone”.
If todd and mark are so miffed about this, maybe they should start their own civil union chapel, and quit trying to force their perverse lifestyle on everybody else.
So the State Dept. Is going after two private businesses because they don’t perform civil union ceremonies? Sound about right?
Whatever happened to “We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone”.
If todd and mark are so miffed about this, maybe they should start their own civil union chapel, and quit trying to force their perverse lifestyle on everybody else.
The bottom line is that if there is a trial before a jury, the accommodations will win, but if it is just in front of a judge, the homosexuals will win.
This is because these homosexual marriage laws are exclusively the work of the government *against* the will of the people. That is why such laws have *always* been created in such a way that the people are not *permitted* to refuse. Because if given the opportunity, the people *will* invariably refuse homosexual marriage.
Therefore, a defense before the jury is simple. “This law demonstrates the arrogance of the state against the conscience of the individual. The state cannot decree that the people must worship Moloch instead of God. Nor can the state decree that people act against their conscience, be it to pick up arms and murder another person, commit or suborn acts of perversion.”
Media outlets have to comply with the same anti-discrimination regs. This helps to explain media bias on the issue — editorial policy quickly aligns with government-mandated personnel policy.