Posted on 08/18/2011 9:53:50 AM PDT by tcrlaf
Good one!
The list is very long, going back to Hawaii, Occidental College, Columbia, Harvard, Chicago, Father Pfleegor, etc.
Hope you are right. I want her to run...she will have my support if she does.
However, I question the strategy. She is losing valuable time while others boost their image daily. She will soon be running from behind. I know she is an excellent runner, but it’s hard playing catchup.
Do you know who her advisors are? I hope she has chosen wisely this time.
Yes, she runs her own show. Closest advisor: Todd.
Read this: You will feel much, better, although, I disagree that she learned *from Hillary*.
I consider myself a libertarian but I am not a “Paul-tard.” I can’t imagine any libertarian would approve of such an ad. I could be mistaken.
Clearly he is obsessed with the Governor but I’m thinking that somebody else in the ‘wings’ may be stoking the craziness.
So she's guilty until proven innocent in your mind. What's your source, some supermarket tabloid? Your PDS is affecting your brain.
One shouldn’t give the allegations any credibility by addressing them. Usually the ones who deny it are guilty—see Clinton, Edwards, etc...
It’s a “when did you stop beating your wife” situation. Silence is golden. I don’t think Palin has ever stooped to answer the adultery allegations against her, either.
You mean like Dan and Robin Rather?
A man wouldn't call that an affair...more like a friend without benefits.
A very fine line tween ronpaul and larryflint!
Maybe you should change that to “Have You Ever Had Sex With Ron Paul?”.
Karl Rove? KARL ROVE???? What you in denial or just trying to hide the fact this was a ron”larryflint”paul stunt?
Truth is slowly coming out. ronpaul AND ronpaulnutz are more dangerous than nobama to America.
Heck, no, my point is they don't have to deny it--neither one of them. Just check the internet, you'll find lots of references. I'm saying anyone running for office is vulnerable to these kinds of allegations and there is no reason why they should have to deny any of them.
... but the answer to that would be “no” :)
If the evidence was out there, you can be sure the Kay Bailey Hutchison campaign would have leaked it in the last gov election.
Yes, I love how the Paultards spam straw polls and internet polls and then act like it means something significant.
What it means is that they're good at buying up slots in straw polls and spamming internet polls.
Good, they just helped enrich the Republican party of Iowa and in the long run it will have done Paul no good. We'll take his money.
Some of the Paultards started pushing that one on here a couple of months ago.
It’s just a newspaper ad and a newspaper should not have to decide on which ads are and ads are not politically palatable.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.