Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Goldwater Talking Point (gearing up for Rick Perry)
RedState ^ | August 22, 2011 | Erick Erickson

Posted on 08/22/2011 2:29:17 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last
To: lentulusgracchus
Molly Ivins called him that...

Why would any self-respecting conservative quote Molly Ivins? That woman was so wacked-out in her politics and so mean-spirited, she made Ann Richards look like a cuddly, little puppy.

41 posted on 08/22/2011 7:29:13 AM PDT by CommerceComet (Governor Romney, why would any conservative vote for the author of the beta version of ObamaCare?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: HerrBlucher
"Appears" indeed, because most of them will not state who they support, its like pulling teeth and they never fess up. So, yes, they either must be the Axlerod gang or the Paulistas, or both. They are extremely annoying.

LOL!

Of the candidates (declared), or those of us holding out to decide from the current field if Sarah doesn't declare?

Perry just entered the race, many of us are relatively unfamilliar with him, and he's going through vetting for us.

If that gets all y'all's panties in a wad, so be it!

42 posted on 08/22/2011 9:20:23 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe
If that gets all y'all's panties in a wad, so be it!

We are in the process of comparing candidates. If someone is going to bash a candidate for not being conservative enough then it must in the context of "compared to who." If the basher is not willing to fess up who their candidate is, then their argument is moot. Palin/Bachmann supporters don't hide who their candidate is, as such, one can safely assume that the bashers who don't indicate their preference are either Mittsters, axlerodians, or Paulistas. It is that simple.

43 posted on 08/22/2011 9:29:56 AM PDT by HerrBlucher ("It is terrible to contemplate how few politicians are hanged." G.K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
That is very interesting.
Since the HEB owner along with a few other millionaires worked hard to stop the TX GOP from passing serious illegal alien legislation. They are serious contributors to the GOP in the past.
44 posted on 08/22/2011 9:54:27 AM PDT by ncalburt (NO MORE WIMPS need to apply to fight the Soros Funded Puppet !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
In 2004, the issue was surrender in the war on terror. John Kerry portrayed himself as strong on defense, but his record suggested otherwise. Using a now famous advertisement with a pack of wolves, the Bush campaign destroyed Kerry’s reputation as someone who could be trusted to keep us safe.

Sure, that's right. John Kerry lost because Rove and company ran an ad that featured wolves. Remember how it became the focal point of the campaign?

Okay, maybe not.

45 posted on 08/22/2011 10:02:09 AM PDT by Interesting Times (WinterSoldier.com. SwiftVets.com. ToSetTheRecordStraight.com.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HerrBlucher
Compared to who??

Not really, more of a 'compared to what'?

I want to know where they stand on the issues, not who is on which side of them.

What have they done? What statist acts have they either supported or opposed?

Proof of fiscal responsibility?

Moral fiber? Et cetera.

Let's see how they all add up compared to a fixed standard, and not just who is relatively more or less than the other.

Political (moral) relativity instead of an absolute standard is how we got to the point where pro-abortion, anti-gun statists are deemed "conservative" in some areas.

If the discussion is about Perry, or Palin, or Bachmann or whoever, discuss them, don't go off to Freeper Island bashing someone else instead of discussing whoever is being discussed.

Perry supporters don't gain squat by going off on people calling them 'Paultards' and launching into tirades about Ron Paul if they haven't answered the questions about Perry, for example, because it is just changing the subject.

If anything, that'll cost Perry a second look and support because people weary of that crap.

You don't need to bash some other candidate to support your own, or you haven't got much.

46 posted on 08/22/2011 10:17:26 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe
Political (moral) relativity instead of an absolute standard is how we got to the point where pro-abortion, anti-gun statists are deemed "conservative" in some areas.

When the standard is "who is most conservative", which appears to be THE standard here at FR, and there is only a small pool of candidates to choose from that demands by necessity "relativity." Weighing a candidate against some airy ideal is fine when choosing a hero, but when there is competition for a political seat, one must choose which one "best" fits the ideal.

Then, of course, there is the added, and very important, consideration, which one can win.

I have no time for those who won't show their cards. BTW, it isn't just Perry supporters that rail against "Paultards", Palin, Bachmann, Cain supporters do it too, its not like the term "Paultard" was coined AFTER Perry got in. Far from it.

47 posted on 08/22/2011 10:46:55 AM PDT by HerrBlucher ("It is terrible to contemplate how few politicians are hanged." G.K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: HerrBlucher
I have no time for those who won't show their cards. BTW, it isn't just Perry supporters that rail against "Paultards", Palin, Bachmann, Cain supporters do it too, its not like the term "Paultard" was coined AFTER Perry got in. Far from it.

Interesting, but you are going to alienate the undecided--and you won't convert any 'paultards', either.

But because no declared candidate has strongly advocated doing what really needs to be done to keep our great-grandchildren from living in economic slavery, I'm still undecided.

There are 'stoppers' out there, too: some issues which frankly will cost an otherwise good candidate my vote if they take the wrong side.

I don't expect perfection, but I do expect a clear effort or at least a willingness to admit mistakes and learn from them. Actions speak louder than words, though, and if their actions belie their words, the words don't count.

Aside from that, I've noticed hostility toward people who don' just sing praises for Perry.

Well, as I said, many of us don't know him. Get over the Tejas-centricity and tell us why we should vote for him.

If there are some ugly bits, better discuss those as well, rather than berate those who bring them up. Address the issue. You won't sell me a Toyota by howling about 'Ford-bots' and berating Mercedes.

(Did you know the one made cars for the Nazis and the other had factories in the USSR?--back in the 40s!)

There are still those of us who want to kick the tires, slam the doors, look under the hood, and check under the vehicle for drips and leaks--especially the latter, because those of us who believe in a far more originalist interpretation of the Untied States Constitution than any candidate has thus far embraced have spent plenty of time under the bus--after every election.

So some of us will be slow to declare support for any primary candidate, especially this year.

We'll vote for the most Conservative, so long as we find them credible.

48 posted on 08/22/2011 12:43:42 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Sorry I should have been more clear, I wasn’t asking you since you had already answered.


49 posted on 08/22/2011 1:40:02 PM PDT by palmer (Cooperating with Obama = helping him extend the depression and implement socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: PhilDragoo

I’ve always enjoyed reading accounts of your many interesting experiences over the years, Phil. You should write a book!! Perhaps you have.


50 posted on 08/22/2011 3:40:29 PM PDT by potlatch (The landlord is in place,...... and the lease may soon expire.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife; potlatch; devolve; ntnychik; dixiechick2000
I followed the link for Charles Butt CEO HEB for 2010, 2008, 2006, 2004, 2002, 2000--no Rick Perry.

Sarah may declare the 3d, or she may not.

Steve King backs Michelle Bachman--but either Steve or Michelle would be vastly better as Speaker than Boehner.

Perry or Palin would be vastly better than the puppet of the Red and Black--

--who is toppling secular regimes and replacing them with Islamist ones.

Huntsman--not Perry--tracks with the Rovian punch-pulling strategy which allowed the Left to suppress Bush's poll numbers.

We face another time for choosing--We win; Obama loses.


CLICK ON THE CONSERVATIVES

51 posted on 08/22/2011 3:48:46 PM PDT by PhilDragoo (Hussein: Islamo-Commie from Kenya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


52 posted on 08/22/2011 3:55:48 PM PDT by devolve (If my graphics offend you/HLS scroll down - If too large simply carefully back away from your PC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: shield
You voted for Bill White in the general election for Governor.

Bull.

That's called overplaying your hand. Now you're discredited.

53 posted on 08/22/2011 9:08:02 PM PDT by lentulusgracchus (Concealed carry is a pro-life position.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: lentulusgracchus

Then you stayed home...there is NO way you voted for Rick Perry.


54 posted on 08/22/2011 9:36:22 PM PDT by shield (Rev 2:9 Woe unto those who say they are Judahites and are not, but are of the syna GOG ue of Satan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: shield
What, and miss a chance to vote for all the good down-ballot candidates who ARE NOT tools of billionaires or enemies of society?

Wouldn't refuse the good guys my support.

55 posted on 08/23/2011 12:21:07 PM PDT by lentulusgracchus (Concealed carry is a pro-life position.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Good read.


56 posted on 09/26/2011 10:01:30 AM PDT by StAnDeliver (/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
The only way the Dems are going to win in 2012 is to put the Republican nominee in the same place they put Goldwater, very likely by the same means.

The Secret Service had better be on their toes. There's only one way Obama can guarantee a RAT landslide, and it ain't by running.

57 posted on 09/26/2011 10:07:30 AM PDT by Jim Noble (To live peacefully with credit-based consumption and fiat money, men would have to be angels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson