Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama's Latest Stimulus: Handing Out Jobless Benefits To Striking Workers
Zero Hedge ^ | 8/25/11 | Tyler Durden

Posted on 08/25/2011 9:09:04 AM PDT by Nachum

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

1 posted on 08/25/2011 9:09:07 AM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...

The list, ping

Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list

http://www.nachumlist.com/


2 posted on 08/25/2011 9:09:54 AM PDT by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

This is incorrect. They filed, but their claims will be denied. If their claims are not denied, then there is a story. I have not seen any reports that check were actually cut.


3 posted on 08/25/2011 9:12:22 AM PDT by Tulane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

amazing.

i thought unions had a fund of their own for strikes.


4 posted on 08/25/2011 9:12:36 AM PDT by ken21 (ruling class dem + rino progressives -- destroying america for 150 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
A federally-subsidized labor union strike.

Who would have thunk it?

5 posted on 08/25/2011 9:13:25 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Palin is coming, and the Tea Party is coming with her.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Well isn’t this interesting. the strikers filed for unemployment even though I guarantee you they knew and were told by the union they were not eligible.

I guess they wanted to see if the people at their state unemplpyment were too stupid

But his hurts 0dumbo even when it turns out they will be denied.

Yes there are unions funds for strikes and amazingly IF the union had not called off the strike the unions would have had to start paying the stikers next week


6 posted on 08/25/2011 9:17:35 AM PDT by RWGinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tulane

That makes too much sense, although we can hope they are denied


7 posted on 08/25/2011 9:18:20 AM PDT by WhyisaTexasgirlinPA (Maxine Waters tells Tea Party to "go to hell" - no thanks, I have no desire to move to your district)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

“A federally-subsidized labor union strike. “

Holder’s people? Nah, couldn’t be. n/s


8 posted on 08/25/2011 9:18:28 AM PDT by cameraeye (A happy kuffir!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cameraeye

Union bosses always tell striking workers to file for unemployment. It gets them off their back. But they never get any benefits.


9 posted on 08/25/2011 9:20:07 AM PDT by aimhigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Tulane

Just goes to show how dumb and entitled many of our citizens are. Refusing to go to work and expecting the gov’t to pay you to do so? What a concept!


10 posted on 08/25/2011 9:34:31 AM PDT by milwguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

This is more than corruption. This is a coup de’ tat by special interests and the extreme left.

Waiting to see which candidate mentions prison sentences...


11 posted on 08/25/2011 9:41:40 AM PDT by tarotsailor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWGinger
Well isn’t this interesting. the strikers filed for unemployment even though I guarantee you they knew and were told by the union they were not eligible.

Who says they filed? The AP?

The whole "unemployment skewed by the strike" meme is a total fabrication put out by the WH.

12 posted on 08/25/2011 9:49:15 AM PDT by NY.SS-Bar9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; narses; SunkenCiv; SmithL; Nachum; NY.SS-Bar9

OK.

So that means we have the White House (you know, that “official” source of United States’ policies and regulations and enforcement and economic priorities ?) claiming loudly and in public that striking union members ARE RESPONSIBLE for the rise in unemployment figures BECAUSE they are deliberately doing something illegal to get money illegally from the public. Right?

But - the AP and the mainstream media ABCNNBCBS are both covering for the illegal activities of the union - almost regardless of whether the claims will be accepted - and I assure, YES, they will be accepted by the government union “workers” processing the illegal claims! Worse, if this IS the reason for the rise in unemployment, then the media is encouraging both lies (from the Obama regime) and the illegal activity from the union.


13 posted on 08/25/2011 10:28:31 AM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: NY.SS-Bar9

Who says they filed?
The Labor Dept
from the link
“The Department of Labor noted that the Verizon worker strike generated about 12,500 claims during the week ending August 13 and about 8,500 claims the week ending August 20 (not seasonally adjusted”

Did the strikers really file even though anyone but a idiot would know they don’t qualify?
it will be interesting to see how this plays out. If the strikers did file won’t the reduce the number once they are denied?


14 posted on 08/25/2011 10:33:58 AM PDT by RWGinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Verizon should draw a hard line on this.

If Joe Smith filed for unemployment, I'd say he's no longer on strike, he's UNEMPLOYED (he must have quit).

When strike's over, Verizon should have the option to either rehire him at bottom of pay scale or let him go.

15 posted on 08/25/2011 10:36:42 AM PDT by ZOOKER ( Exploring the fine line between cynicism and outright depression)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Didn’t they go on strike because of the higher health care premiums DUE TO OBAMACARE? Well then, it would make perfect sense that they would get unemployment benefits in this bizzarro world that UhBummer is creating.


16 posted on 08/25/2011 10:48:19 AM PDT by BMCinSC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: milwguy

Just goes to show how dumb and entitled many of our citizens are. Refusing to go to work and expecting the gov’t to pay you to do so? What a concept!
______________

Amen.


17 posted on 08/25/2011 10:49:59 AM PDT by Tulane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Dems buying votes with tax money, plain and simple.


18 posted on 08/25/2011 11:39:17 AM PDT by mikey_hates_everything
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken21

One of the reasons the union called off the strike when they did is because if it had gone on for another week, they would have been obligated to shell out 10M a week in strike benefits.


19 posted on 08/25/2011 11:39:31 AM PDT by JPG (Barry says he'll promise to save more later if he can spend more now. Black bus economics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JPG

i see.


20 posted on 08/25/2011 12:39:53 PM PDT by ken21 (ruling class dem + rino progressives -- destroying america for 150 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson