Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Preparing To Sue Banks For Billions Over Misrepresenting Safety Of Mortgage Securities
TBI ^ | 9-1-2011 | Zeke Miller

Posted on 09/01/2011 8:31:48 PM PDT by blam

US Preparing To Sue Banks For Billions Over Misrepresenting Safety Of Mortgage Securities

Zeke Miller
Sep. 1, 2011, 10:37 PM

The New York Times scoops that the federal government is preparing to file suit against a dozen major banks in the coming days for their roles in 2008 financial crisis.

The Federal Housing Finance Agency, which oversees Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, is alleging that the banks misrepresented the quality of mortgages bundled together as securities — billing subprime loans as secure investments.

Among the banks set to be slapped with lawsuits according to the Times are: Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, Goldman Sachs and Deutsche Bank. The agency filed suit against UBS earlier this year for $900 million in damages.

Fannie and Freddie lost more than $30 billion during the financial crisis — at least in part due to the bad loans they bought.

The lawsuits are expected to be filed Friday, or else just after the holiday weekend.

(Excerpt) Read more at businessinsider.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: banks; economy; fanniemae; fhfa; freddiemac; lawsuits; mortgages; police; shakedown; taxes; teachers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

1 posted on 09/01/2011 8:31:53 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam

Obama jobs plan?

Stimulus for attorneys?


2 posted on 09/01/2011 8:33:27 PM PDT by cripplecreek (A vote for Amnesty is a vote for a Permenant Democrat majority. ..Choose well.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

That makes sense. We had to spend all that TARP money so that the banks would have enough money for us to sue them.


3 posted on 09/01/2011 8:33:35 PM PDT by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Aren’t these the same banks who got HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS in bailout money from this same administration?!


4 posted on 09/01/2011 8:34:44 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (I'll raise $2million for Gov. Sarah Palin. What'll you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

I need to hear this like I need a hole in the head.


5 posted on 09/01/2011 8:34:48 PM PDT by Gabz (Democrats for Voldemort.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

I’m not all that enamored of Big Banking, but c’mon, after the government in concert with community organizers hassles banks into writing loans which were already known to be far riskier than normal, why should the government turn around and try to penalize banks for bowing to its will?


6 posted on 09/01/2011 8:35:09 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (There's gonna be a Redneck Revolution! (See my freep page) [rednecks come in many colors])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...

The list, ping

Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list

http://www.nachumlist.com/


7 posted on 09/01/2011 8:36:23 PM PDT by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Hope you don’t have any more than $100,000 in any one bank. That is all that the FDIC will guarantee.


8 posted on 09/01/2011 8:37:25 PM PDT by JimmyMc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Wish they would sue Johnson, Gorelick, Raines, and other prominent progressives who cooked the books at Freddie and Fannie in order to obtain gigantic bonuses.


9 posted on 09/01/2011 8:39:35 PM PDT by volunbeer (Keep the dope, we'll make the change in 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

The campaign is starting. First up ‘show trials’ to appease the capitalist hating leftists in Obama’s base.

This though could backfire very badly for the left-wing. Those in Obama’s administration are not to smart at all. Logically if you sue someone they fight back. If government officials and Congress is forced to testify under oath it may not fair well for democrats. This also may not help the democrats campaign donations as well.


10 posted on 09/01/2011 8:45:33 PM PDT by TheBigIf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Who were also forced into what they are being sued over by the government?


11 posted on 09/01/2011 8:46:09 PM PDT by Ingtar (Together we go broke (from a Pookie18 post))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Too big to fail.

Not to big to sue.

Nothing the Kenyan does any more surprises me. Nothing.


12 posted on 09/01/2011 8:46:15 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd (The views and opinions expressed in this post are true and correct. Deal with it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: blam

More of our money for their slush funds. Just throw the bums from the government in the clink.


13 posted on 09/01/2011 8:47:41 PM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: volunbeer

Lets hope that of these corrupt democrat cronies get forced to testify and their criminal actions get further exposed and used by the legal team defending the banks.


14 posted on 09/01/2011 8:47:41 PM PDT by TheBigIf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: blam

Wait, what? The government is going to sue private banks for monetary damages payable to whom ... the government? And then the banks will turn around and get a bailout from whom ... the government ... to pay the government’s damages? Oh, yeah, THIS makes a lot of sense. /s


15 posted on 09/01/2011 8:49:04 PM PDT by Fast Moving Angel (If he has nothing to hide, why is he spending so much $$$ hiding it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheBigIf
Obama and the banks are on the same side.

When Obama says "The rich" he means a couple making $250,000 not his buddies at Goldman Sachs or Wells Fargo.

Sure there might be some show trial stuff... but Obama will continue to bail out large banks and screw the middle class.
16 posted on 09/01/2011 8:50:24 PM PDT by Minus_The_Bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: volunbeer
"Wish they would sue Johnson, Gorelick, Raines, and other prominent progressives who cooked the books at Freddie and Fannie in order to obtain gigantic bonuses."

I was thinking the same thing. They're mostly minorities though and deserve all they stole, right?

The Government Is Going To Sue The Big Banks For Swindling Fannie, Freddie, and Others On Crap Mortgages

17 posted on 09/01/2011 8:50:32 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: blam

” ( - - - The Federal Housing Finance Agency, which oversees Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, is alleging that the banks misrepresented the quality of mortgages bundled together as securities — billing subprime loans as secure investments. - - ) .

FINALLY, the CYA technique of the Feds is on its way to trial !

Everybody knows that in September, 2008 the FHA went bankrupt, along with Fannie and Freddie. Some even call it the bursting of “The Fannie Bubble.”

Emeritus Sheriff of Nottingham Walk-the-Plank-Hank set out to perform a CYA maneuver which was bought by the L.I.E. Media and then sold to the public.

In July, 2008 Robo-Congressman Sub-prime Barney and Crissey Doodle-Doo misrepresented the financial stability of the entire Fannie Bubble.

The FHA, Fannie and Freddy did not do THEIR due diligence.

Heads need to roll starting with Barney, Crissey and the leaders of Fannie, Freddie, and especially the leaders of the FHA.


18 posted on 09/01/2011 8:52:36 PM PDT by Graewoulf ( obamatrauma"care" violates the 1890 Sherman Anti-Trust Law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

What a scam!

We need to clear the rats out of DC


19 posted on 09/01/2011 8:53:20 PM PDT by mylife (OPINIONS ~ $ 1.00 HALFBAKED ~ 50c)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Minus_The_Bear

“Obama and the banks are on the same side. “

I dont disagree but for the banks not to defend themselves would make this even more interesting.

My first reaction was that this is a show trial for Obama far left base in order to get them really riled up that Obama is really fighting against those evil capitalists on Wall Street.

But why would the banks just allow themselves to be damaged this way?

It would seem to me that the Obama administration is biting off more then they could chew possibly. Banks that were friends may turn against him. Democrat corruption may be exposed by banks legal teams in efforts to fight back.


20 posted on 09/01/2011 8:56:03 PM PDT by TheBigIf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson