Posted on 09/01/2011 9:26:08 PM PDT by Clairity
He sure is. Not only that, he supports mandatory vaccinations along the Trans-Texas Corridor of your illegal alien children that will turn THEM into drag queens and Al Gore supporters! I read it on the internet, so it must be true.
Bachmann may have her heart in the right place, but she has no chance of winning either the GOP nomination or the general election. The race is between Perry and Romney and any votes for Bachmann just helps Romney.
is that Scott brown from texas?
Nah, the only lesson I need is Freepers jumping quickly on another potential RINO.
Reminds me of most Freepers who drooled like schoolgirls on Scott Brown. Perry...Scott Brown of Texas LOL
“Put the lawbreakers in jail. Leave innocent children out of this.”
Deport the lawbreakers, along with their families. Put the business owners that hired them without checking their status in jail. Hire law abiding citizens in their stead. Allow their offspring to pay in-state tuition.
That’s a plan I can get behind.
[ but she has no chance of winning either the GOP nomination or the general election. ]
Peewee Herman could win against Zero.. Its the primary’s that count.. Romney is the liberal MSM choice.. Perry is the conservative MSM choice..
Bachmann is the ONLY game in town.. for a conservative..
“Umm.. my argument has nothing to do with the children. What the hell are you talking about?”
Geez, don’t know how I could have concluded that it did, given your earlier post:
“So you support punishing people whose parents committ crimes?”
Who could have imagined you were talking about children? All of the folks on this thread who made the same grievous error as did I should be scolded, no doubt.
For me, this is a big endorsement, I supported Forbes when he ran.
I’ll rephrase my question.
“So you support punishing people whose relatives committ crimes?”
Make you feel better?
“So you support punishing people whose relatives committ crimes?”
Yes. If they too are in the country illegally and if deportation comprises “punishment.” As a practical matter, yours is still a DREAM act argument—don’t punish kids. Changing “kids” to “relatives” doesn’t change the substance of the argument.
Thanks for the ping. raygun. Another interesting thread (yes I read it all).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.