[FlingWingFlyer]

Once all the hos working down at the NYT start wearing burqas and keeping their mouths shut and faces hidden, I’ll think about it.

[Travis McGee]

What's not to love?

[Parley Baer]

This just confirms that the nyt is an insane asylum. No rational thought in the whole place.

[edcoil]

Well, if we just kill them and not put them in prison - we’d save a lot of money. There are no misdemeanors in their law.

You steal you lose your hand, anything else you die.

It is a crime deterrent and cost savings measure.

[heartwood]

If people freely agree to sharia arbitration, that’s fine with me. Orthodox Jews have marriage courts and kosher slaughter supervision.

The thing we don’t need is more Muslims - more immigrants, more prison converts.

[VikingMom]

Your posting was a bit confusing at first because you didn’t differentiate your opening comments from the actual text that appeared in the paper. You may want to modify that so that it’s clear which is which.

Also, was this an editorial or a straight news article? And is the author listed?

[bmwcyle]

Satan controls so much today. The NYT is his paper.

[yefragetuwrabrumuy]

I think America could and might embrace *parts* of Sharia Law.

Like beheading terrorist Muslims. Fine and dandy in Sharia Law, but totally a no-go under US law. Hanging is also cool in Sharia, without endless federal judges refusing to permit it because they personally don’t like it, or any other form of capital punishment, and they think they know better, so can legislate from the bench.

So, yep, we could have refilled Gitmo a few dozen times, held military trials, then promptly hung the terrorists we put in there, to make room for more.

And sea piracy? No problem. Even from the early days of our Republic, federal judges wanted the US Navy to spend six months to bring African pirates back to the US for trial. It would be so much easier if our ships’ Captains had the authority to hang pirates on their own ships, as the British used to do.

But, other than that, Sharia Law is pretty much barbaric ca-ca, used to justify the whims of tribal goombas in 4th world nations.

[DTogo]

NYTimes: "The crusade against Shariah undermines American democracy, ignores our country’s successful history of religious tolerance and assimilation, and creates a dangerous divide between America and its fastest-growing religious minority."

American democracy and assimilation is directly contrary to Shariah.

[LucyT]

New York Times: America Should Embrace Sharia Law

.

[MaxMax]

The NYT' would not exist under Sharia law. Maybe they should move
their offices to another continent.

[Rufii]

[DManA]

Supporters of these bills contend that such measures are needed to protect the country against homegrown terrorism and safeguard its Judeo-Christian values.

B.S. Straw man argument. Supporters of the bill KNOW Sharia is UNCONSTITUTIONAL. Any one who supports it is supporting sedition.

[A_perfect_lady]

If we ever do embrace Shariah Law, it will be liberals who suffer, not conservatives. They're the ones who steal, do drugs, and screw around. One year of strict Shariah and there'd be no liberal women left, and all the liberal men would have only one hand left.

Hm....

[Gritty]

America needs to designate the New York Times Building as the Official National Heritage Insane Asylum Landmark and move on.

[RoadTest]

Islam is Naziism under cover of religion.

[Joe Boucher]

Yeah,,,,
All you New York Jews keep on supporting the n.y.times.
Keep reading their bile. Keep voting against the interests of Israel.

Fools.

[americanophile]

ISLAMIZATION PING LIST

"The mosques are our barracks, the domes our helmets,
the minarets our bayonets and the faithful our soldiers."

Infidels: freepmail me if you want on or off this list.

[BunnySlippers]

Are you sure this is not a blog?

[bgill]

Let one of them get stoned to death and they may change their mind.