Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama’s “Country Before Party” Nonsense
Commentary ^ | 09.05.2011 | John Podhoretz

Posted on 09/05/2011 5:58:09 PM PDT by Qbert

News reports suggest that on Thursday night, the president will tell Republicans in the House and Senate that they should put “country before party” and endorse his proposals for job creation. The “country before party” line has become Obama’s new theme in the wake of the debt crisis, and the passion with which he invokes it indicates it’s something he actually and truly believes in.

And it’s utter nonsense. Offensive nonsense too. Obama isn’t truly asking Republicans to put country before party. He is asking them to elevate the interests and ideas of the Democratic party higher than their own ideas, their sense of what is best for the nation, and their deeply held convictions about the moral hazard posed by a too-large government and a populace too reliant on it. They won’t do it, and they shouldn’t, and the next time liberals complain that conservatives unfairly impugn their patriotism, Obama’s effort to do just that with his loyal ideological opposition should be thrown in their face.


TOPICS: Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: countrybeforeparty; demagoguery; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last
To: Qbert

I can imagine Leno delivering a one-liner like this...

“Republicans are responding, ‘oh, we will, Mr. President, when you start putting country before golf’”.


41 posted on 09/05/2011 8:48:27 PM PDT by txrangerette ("...HOLD TO THE TRUTH; SPEAK WITHOUT FEAR." - Glenn Beck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Qbert

I think they ought to give Obama just what he wants, and the Democrats can answer for it in 2012.


42 posted on 09/05/2011 9:49:48 PM PDT by The Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Qbert

“Republicans must place MY vision of Amerika above any they may harbor” Yeah,that’s what I thought he said.


43 posted on 09/05/2011 10:23:13 PM PDT by WePledge (Ich werde fur immer ein Hollenhund werden. Semper Fidelis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Qbert

Nonsense.....

Obama’s objective and the thrust of his 2012 re-election campaign, because he cannot credibly defend his administration’s economic failure, will be to shift the blame he was placing on Bush onto the Republicans in Congress.

Remember that the general population likes the “congress” even less than Obama.....Obama see’s this as the arrow pointing to a successful re-election strategy....

2008 Obama ran against Bush’s 3rd term (MacCain)

2009-2011 Obama blames “Bush and Republicans for his failures.”

2012 Obama will run against Congress amd the TEA party caucus in the House. “It’s the Obstructionist Republican Congress’ fault!”

With Obama it’s all about finding a suitable scape goat.


44 posted on 09/05/2011 11:18:56 PM PDT by Forty-Niner (Ursus Arctos Horribilis......get your GRRRRR on!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz
Hearing Obama say, “we won, you lost, get over it”, really hurt back then. At the time there was nothing we could do about it. Advantage Obama.
But that remark revealed how he as the victor understands victory. He ruthlessly rammed forward his agenda with NO talk of bipartisanship. Only when this guy loses do we hear about how important a bipartisanship solution is and then, it's only lip service.
The "Country before party" BS is just such lip service. It's an attempt to fog up the horizon and get the dumb republicans to lay down their victory and compromise. Sadly, some of them are stupid enough to do just that. Some will fall for the rhetoric as we've seen in the past. So weak! McCain calling the Democrats, "My friends" comes to mind. That's not how they viewed him!
45 posted on 09/06/2011 2:00:53 AM PDT by ThirstyMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Qbert
THIS ISSUE got lost in the hype surrounding Hoffa's thug speech. This is a rare time I would side with Hillary.
46 posted on 09/06/2011 2:04:04 PM PDT by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson