Posted on 09/06/2011 5:31:32 PM PDT by saganite
(Will open in new window)
(Will open in new window)
What is “Nature Journal of Science”? Is that the name of the journal? or is it just “Nature”, which is indeed the highest cited and highly reputed journal? I didnt find any citation in the article listed that would take me to the original article (supposedly) published in Nature.
Not saying it is wrong or anything, just it seems sleazy and backhanded to me...
I doubt it was published anywhere..
Here’s the article link:
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v476/n7361/full/nature10343.html
Another interesting link:
http://blogs.nature.com/news/2011/09/cool_climate_paper_sinks_journ.html
Gee, if global warming were really so well demonstrated by science, would they need to persecute non-believers?
See my post #46
No, the article that the OP’s link talks about is by Professor Jyrki Kauppinen, or rather has him as one of the authors, while the article you provide link to doesn’t.
TNX
Been doing battle tonight with the Obots on Twitter. Man they have a lot of them on the Obozo payroll. Many say they are in Canada. Don’t believe it, but they are foreign, possibly from another planet.
They are up to their old trick. Again I saw some of them remove my posts. Made them vanish without a trace. I love the smell of Obot brains exploding.
This thing is going to blow. hee hee hee
I second...
you might enjoy the humor of this:
What are Cosmic Rays?
http://www.scostep.ucar.edu/comics/books/cosmicrays_e.pdf
Heh, I remember the “global warming” scam.
Thank God that scheme got exposed before the United Nations was allowed to “redistribute” zillions of American energy-tax dollars around the globe forever, even as a handful of connected politicians here and abroad amassed “carbon trading” fortunes.
Whew! Those pigs came dangerously close to actually pulling it off!
What I thought he was talking about was this:
http://hotair.com/archives/2011/08/31/has-the-agw-argument-imploded/
And the reference I gave would have been pertinent to that.
But you are correct, the source he mentions is not one of the authors of the CERN article. I have no idea who Jyrki Kauppinen is or why Street quotes him. Street’s column is certainly botched work, not something anyone should hang their hat on.
No, I’m not talking about only one article; I’ve seen questioning about the peer review process for this Nature story in several sites.
This is not a legal case; there is no binding precedent in science.
btt
“I had one of these,”
I built a cloud chamber in the 9th grade. 1959. Plans were in Scientific Experimenter magazine. Got an A in Science Class.
I’ve only seen peer-review questioned in regards to the Remote Sensing article.
Could point me somewhere that talks about this in regards to the Nature article? Google didn’t come up with anything for me.
I will look, but my brain is full!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.