[Dr. Sivana]

Paul’s ad praised Reagan, and attempted to link Paul to Reagan. Of course, Ron Paul trashed Reagan as a “failure” in 1988, making the ad for him completely disingenuous.

The Huntsman portrayal of Romney as a dusty first baseman’s mitt might have worked better if they used a catcher’s mitt. Still too arcane for most. I am also doubtful that Utah was #1 in job creation in absolute terms, and both stats were taken after both men left office. Moreover, since Perry has a current record for not squashing job creation in his own state, the ad risks driving voters away from Romney, but to Perry, not Huntsman. Huntsman is clearly hoping that southern and rural won’t play well with those “sophisticated” New England voters. He might get 3rd in New Hampshire, and then its over.

[LibertarianInExile]

"Paul’s ad praised Reagan, and attempted to link Paul to Reagan. Of course, Ron Paul trashed Reagan as a “failure” in 1988, making the ad for him completely disingenuous."

No, I think it's that you don't understand the word 'disingenuous.' Disingenous would be Perry running as an anti-illegal immigration candidate, when he's basically been Mr. Dream Act and Mr. Arizona-is-bad and Mr. Sanctuary City--right up until this last year, when suddenly he's Mr. Enforcement. He's Vicente Fox's best pal

and LaRaza's point man

, but now, he's Mr. Enforcement? LOL! Better check your Webster's, 'cause I'm pretty sure Mitt Perry's picture is next to the word "disingenuous" in the dictionary.