Posted on 09/08/2011 11:58:25 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Fresh on drudge go look at the headline acck but here is the picture.I think we can all agree that SNARL FACE needs to go.
FWIW, it's not a smart approach to gaining a majority. By alienating supporters of other candidates with over the top tactics and language it makes it that much harder to support her if she were to be the candidate instead of another that you considered better. We would be smart to remember who the enemy really is.
Pardon me I got your botism wrong you’re a STEVENS bot.Fess up.
Whoa, just back up there!
I count among my friends "soft-moderate Mexican American Republicans" as you call them and I do business with them. Is there something wrong with being a businessperson of Mexican heritage? If not, why is there anything wrong with liking them?
I am holding out for Trump to come back in, he had all the answers, all easy ones too. Still waiting for his 'investigator's report on Obama.
Uh, could you point out where I said anything like that?
It is also dishonest to put words in another poster's mouth, as you are doing here.
You apparently are unwilling to grasp the obvious concept that the presidential candidate is the one who sets the policies for the ticket, not the veep, because the veep is not the one seeking the job where they WILL set the policies if they win.
And I have only 'bashed' Perry on specific issues or utterances, such as his nonsense the other day about using a 35 foot ladder to get over a 30 foot fence, a line right out of la Raza talking points.
I have never said he is dishonest, never said he is corrupt, never said he pushed the Gardasil mandate in return for Merck campaign contributions (even as I disagreed with the mandate itself), and I could support his candidaacy if he wins the nomination, unlike someone like Mitt or Huntsman.
All I am doing is pointing out your absurdity about bashing Palin for not bucking the top of the ticket in 2008, and your bashing Palin for backing the guy in 2010 who made her both a household name and a well-paid household name.
If you see Palin doing that as dishonest, well, you are looking for reasons to bash her, even as you lecture others on the same thread about looking for reasons to bash Perry.
In other words, you are being a rank hypocrite, but we've come to expect that from a lot of supporters of all stripes during primary silly season.
LOL, there are still some of us who don’t share our love easily.
We are a watchin’ and waitin’.
Brett Beir asking Bachmann about Palin stealing her thunder at ~ 2:10 ?
Her safe Answer :” I love Sarah Palin. We are great friends ”
What she was REALLY thinking :” Why the hell is he asking me about Palin? I am a actual POTUS candidate and she is a FNC contributor. Next will ask me what I think about Britt Hume? ”
Perhaps they would all be safer starting with their opinion of Sarah from the beginning.
Like this, Before I answer your question, let me say I love Sarah...and Brit is a real hoot..Okay, on to the question...LOL
I AM waiting for this man to jump back in and brush them all aside:
The Dream of a President kick butts Trump (or If only Trump ran.. )
This man will suck the air out of all of them without even being a candidate, just like before.
That was the title when I posted it. Many times, the title is changed later. I’ve seen the same Kathleen Parker column with a dozen different titles. And don’t you EVER tell me what I can or cannot do on this site again. You’re not Jim Robinson or a moderator, newbie!
She should have said “I admire and respect the work of all of the employees, both on-air and off-air, of FoxNews, Sarah included.”
ROTFLMAO, especially coming from you.
I bet you are getting all excited./sarc
Why does FR feel the need to tear up each other as if they are the candidate themselves?
This is why FR is losing it’s ground - people here don’t allow any freedom of thought. At all. It’s either one way or the highway depending on the person.
This election is about beating Obama. The candidate that should be nominated should hopefully meet at the place where they are the most conservative, yet most electable.
is that Perry? I don’t know. Is it Palin? No one knows since she won’t commit to running. Is it Romney? For quite a while it looked like it.
The point is, the FOCUS should be finding the BEST candidate to beat Obama, NOT ripping each other apart because they favor one candidate or another.
I realize this sentiment is way too mature for most of the people who inhabit this place that have a born-on date of 2008 or later, but let’s at least give some semblance of sanity and professionalism when discussing each of the candidates.
Replay Brett Beir asking Bachmann about Palin stealing her thunder at ~ 2:10
Better yet, Bachmann BEST REPLY to Brett Beir is DA-DA-DA:
”Did Sarah announce she is running while we were debating here? I really love her BUT last I heard she was your co-worker Brett. I heard she might be replacing you. “
I would even call myself a Bachmann-bot if she made me laugh (scream) with that one.
Of course there is freedom of thought on FR. Just don’t post anything remotely critical of Sarah Palin. You can think it all ya want though !
Doggone it. You ruined things by acting adult. LOL
Don’t tell anyone, but Sarah might be a big improvement over Brett, purtier and more entertaining too.
What the hell are you talking about? Are you crazy? Who are you working for? I hope the next purge takes you. Who are you supporting ?? Oh ya ???, your Ma-Ma too...you just hate (fill in name from above post here). Get lost !
Is that what you had in mind? :)
He must be one of them there trolls we have been hearing about!
just kidding, Mike.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.