Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/13/2011 7:47:48 AM PDT by Qbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Qbert

bump.


2 posted on 09/13/2011 7:53:27 AM PDT by ken21 (ruling class dem + rino progressives -- destroying america for 150 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Qbert

3 posted on 09/13/2011 8:25:57 AM PDT by algernonpj (He who pays the piper . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Qbert

This surprising move means that next year’s shortfalls should be unexpectedly smaller than expected, unless the fact that they are adjusting their forecasts downward means that we can expect next year’s surprises to be bigger than previously expected, in which case the expected shortfalls can be expected to be reported as “unexpected” by the same margins as seen in every economic report this year.


5 posted on 09/13/2011 9:16:22 AM PDT by Pollster1 (Natural born citizen of the USA, with the birth certificate to prove it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Qbert

I’m thinking 1.7% growth rate is even too optimistic.


6 posted on 09/13/2011 9:29:26 AM PDT by mamelukesabre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson