Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fox: Obama Jobs Bill Regulates Home Paint Removal, strictly limits political speech to 17 examples
Fox News Channel | 9/13/11

Posted on 09/13/2011 1:10:50 PM PDT by pabianice

Not making this up. 25,500 pages regulating your entire life, moment to moment. Strict fines and/or imprisonment for violations.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: aja; bhofascism; corruption; democrats; economy; govtabuse; liberalfascism; nobama2012; obama; obamadepression; obamajobsbill; obamajobsplan; paint; paintremoval; tyranny
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last
To: pabianice

This bill is joke with so many poison pills daring the GOP the vote it down. The GOP should not even take it up.


41 posted on 09/13/2011 2:30:43 PM PDT by Perdogg (0bama got 0sama?? Really, was 0sama on the golf course?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
Wait, what are you posting Carry Okie?

I'm not sure I follow the quote from your reply. Wasn't that quote what the Libyan leader?

42 posted on 09/13/2011 2:42:09 PM PDT by Alas Babylon!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: dead

Canada has the best healthcare system in the world. You just have to die first.


43 posted on 09/13/2011 2:43:42 PM PDT by Soothesayer9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

Where are the jackasses on our side screaming this in front of a camera and microphone? If this is true, it’s a no brainer to win the public on examples, holding such a document...I’d suspect it isn’t 25000 pages but rather 25000 words. I hope we aren’t stupid enough to make such a mistake. Scream about paint removal being no way having to do with jobs, but stealing freedom. Another useful line is, “We are not China, we have freedom”.


44 posted on 09/13/2011 2:52:13 PM PDT by CincyRichieRich (Keep your head up and keep moving forward!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!
Wasn't that quote what the Libyan leader?

Hmmm... you are quite right. Apparently Control-c didn't work, it pasted the prior copy, and I didn't check because the formatting looked OK. I was responding to the poster's assertion that the lower middle class doesn't pay taxes; they certainly do. Thanks, I'll fix it.

45 posted on 09/13/2011 3:03:42 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (GunWalker: Arming "a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as well funded")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
pabianice wrote:
WTH was that thin pamphlet Obama waved at the camera when giving his Jobsageddon speech?
You mean the Monday afternoon Jobsageddon speech? Or the last Thursday evening Jobsageddon speech?

OK, There were two things here. First, there is the American Jobs Act which is what you saw The Won waving around yesterday. That's the bill he told Congress last Thursday that they must pass immediately. Apparently, he was trying to go beyond Pelosi's "You have to pass the bill so we can see what's in it." The new Democrat plan is, "You have to pass the bill so we can write it." That's what last Thursday's speech sounded like to me.

Then, there's regulations. Regulations don't get written until after the law has been passed and is being implemented. There are no regulations from the "American Jobs Act" yet because the act hasn't been passed yet and signed into law by Obama.

I think, the speed reader on Cavuto today was reading >25,000 pages of regulations from something else. Perhaps from the Health Care law, or perhaps from a single month (that's about right for this administration for a "normal" month).

Still, fox is getting focused these days on some of the regulations that are killing business in this country.

I'll take the opportunity to plug my idea on this. I've already sent this to my (RINO Establishement) Republican Congress Critter. I suggest others should pass this up to their congres critters as well:

My proposal would have to be passed by Congress and signed by a President. It has zero chance of actually becoming law, but here it is:


Regulations are not Laws Act

No regulation proposed by the Executive Branch or any agency thereof shall have the force of law until it is passed by a majority of both houses of Congress and signed into law by the President.

All regulations currently documented in the "Code of Federal Regulations" will sunset 5 years after the passage of this act, unless those regulations are presented to Congress and passed by a majority in both houses of the Congress and signed into law by the President.

That's really the only way we will be freed from these regulations.

The Constitution states “All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.” For many years, the Executive branch has been exercising legislative powers through regulations and subjecting the people of this country to new laws with no accountability to the voters. This is the heart of the problem.

My proposal would start to undo that damage and address the fundamental threat to our liberty from executive regulations.

Republicans would rather have the political issue and nibble back at the regulations a few at a time than address the real issue. Besides, when they get control of the Congress and the Presidency, Republicans will use "their turn" to further their favorite regulations and abuse and usurp powers not granted to the executive in the Constitution. They won't stop it because they want the power when they get "their turn."

46 posted on 09/13/2011 3:10:52 PM PDT by cc2k ( If having an "R" makes you conservative, does walking into a barn make you a horse's (_*_)?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darnright; Alas Babylon!
Sorry about the prior reply, the control-c apparently didn't take. Here is the quote to which I was replying:

How can this be if middle class families don’t pay any tax? Or is he labeling someone making $250,000.00 a year middle class?

Here is what I said:

Yes they do. The average middle class family pays Social Security taxes at a far higher effective rate than do the wealthy.

With my apologies to the forum.

A lot of posters here don't seem to realize that the lower middle class often pays a HIGHER rate of tax when it comes to disposable income. Much of it is hidden in the products they buy, sales taxes, property taxes on their rental housing, and of course Social Security, which is capped for upper income earners. Meanwhile, said higher income earners often benefit from tax-exempt income, both bennies and luxuries footed by their employers or from capital gains, or tax-exempt investment income.

One can argue all one wants about how the lower middle class and poor pay little to no INCOME taxes, but to say that they don't pay taxes at all is just plain wrong, it alienates people we should be attracting, and it is distorting the facts for political purposes.

47 posted on 09/13/2011 3:11:17 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (GunWalker: Arming "a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as well funded")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Darnright; Alas Babylon!
I would like to add that it is equally hypocritical to say that 'you cannot tax a corporation because they just pass it on to consumers' while simultaneously claiming that said consumers don't pay any taxes. WE SHOULD INSTEAD BE TELLING THE LOWER INCOME WORKERS THAT THE TAXES THEY PAY ARE HURTING THEIR CLIMB OUT OF POVERTY. To claim otherwise is not only plain wrong and unjust but harms our chances of winning elections by alienating people into the Democrat camp.
48 posted on 09/13/2011 3:21:57 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (GunWalker: Arming "a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as well funded")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

I just read that summary at the link you posted. I need to get a nausea medication and go lay down now.


49 posted on 09/13/2011 3:27:42 PM PDT by KC Burke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: KC Burke

I read through it felt the same way.


50 posted on 09/13/2011 3:34:54 PM PDT by ColdOne (I miss my poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: sauropod

read


51 posted on 09/13/2011 3:36:42 PM PDT by sauropod (ObaMao: Let them eat peas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

bump for later links and clarity.


52 posted on 09/13/2011 3:38:20 PM PDT by snowrip (Liberal? You are a socialist idiot with no rational argument.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Errant
Hannity says Louie Gomert R-TX advised him there are regulations within the jobs bill allowing an unemployed applicant to sue if he is not hired on grounds that the employer discriminated on the basis of the applicants employment status. (ie. wasn't hired because of current unemployment)

Sounds like typical liberal think. Unintended consequences would be to certify that no unemployed person gets an interview for fear of legal action. Friggn' BRILLIANT !!

I so hope that's in the proposal.....good fodder for democratic idiocy.

53 posted on 09/13/2011 3:38:51 PM PDT by chiller ( EVERY Democrat on EVERY level must go)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack
Photobucket Photobucket Master! We've found the second Sith!
54 posted on 09/13/2011 3:44:14 PM PDT by calicard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll

Bookmark


55 posted on 09/13/2011 3:54:11 PM PDT by SatinDoll (NO FOREIGN NATIONALS AS OUR PRESIDENT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eva

WE HAVE A WINNER!!!!!


56 posted on 09/13/2011 3:59:42 PM PDT by Osage Orange (Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: niteowl77
The next time someone tells you that this bunch is incompetent, just reflect on how fast they always pull a 25,500 (or more) page bill loaded with land mines out of their a$$ at just the right time.

Look at the average dem - they've got a few smart people, their 'stars' but a level or two down from that and they're not a very bright group. I think someone writes this stuff for them and they're thankful to have something - anything that makes them look like they know what they're doing..

57 posted on 09/13/2011 5:20:15 PM PDT by GOPJ (126 people were indicted for being terrorists in the last two years. Every one of them was Muslim.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

link?


58 posted on 09/13/2011 5:45:00 PM PDT by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid! (Cash for clunkers, subsidies - none has worked. The left =one-trick pony on the economy $pend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: svcw

The only link on the entire web is this thread and this

http://www.wopular.com/fox-obama-jobs-bill-regulates-home-paint-removal-strictly-limits-political-speech-17-examples

Fake.


59 posted on 09/13/2011 5:49:07 PM PDT by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid! (Cash for clunkers, subsidies - none has worked. The left =one-trick pony on the economy $pend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

So it is real?You can’t make this crap up.No wonder Obama wants this rushed.Obama is slick and needs impeached now.


60 posted on 09/13/2011 5:52:09 PM PDT by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid! (Cash for clunkers, subsidies - none has worked. The left =one-trick pony on the economy $pend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson