Posted on 09/15/2011 9:44:24 PM PDT by xjcsa
I hope they’re “good” reasons.
lol
I think we, the conservatives, are gaining ground.
Look at what happened to Clinton with a Repub Congress. His hands were tied. Yeah, he got a lot of credit for things he really didn’t do..but who cares? It got done.
Hey, be careful what you say to Ms. DRey, she’s a personal friend of Ricky. That’s why she’s aiming below the belt FRiend.
I don’t teach at UT, no. And I NEVER said I did.
I would figure you to be closer to Austin area. : )
Thank you.
Like I said, CC. I really don’t think he’s too worried.
Hey Sarah, he asked, specifically. I told him my concerns and am waiting to be relieved of those.
Well good on him and may the best WOMAN win!!! ; ~)
Off to sleep.... early day tomorrow... Happy trolling!
You aren’t missing anything. They want me to be dumb so are intentionally misrepresenting it. Thanks for your efforts to clarify.
Windy, have you talked to any college professors lately. She actually sounds fairly sharp compared to some I have ran into lately. Heck even the Won was an adjunct professor, or at least so he claims.
No you didn’t think I was smarter than that. Remember?
See ya tomorrow. nite.
What are you talking about. Are you saying that you asked Perry about your concerns regarding his poser ways. Your concerns that he will set up a mechanical bull in the Oval Office. That he will start signing ten gallon hats.
Drey... really this post is so ingenuous. Good night....
I'm the last one to cast stones about grammar, spelling and writing in general especially when writing is a big part of my job, LOL!
BTW Go Longhorns!
No. I didn’t ask Perry about “his poser ways.”
I appreciate the kind words, but there is a fixation here that troubles me. We do want to be accurate in the charges we make, do we not? If there are defects in grammar, punctuation, style, etc., fine. This isn’t a law review. I was on law review, and even there, though I may have disagreed with the substance of a piece, I never found it beneficial to hammer the piece for errors that weren’t there. It only weakens the force of the criticism of the true errors. And even if you think she merely stumbled into the correct use of the term, it is still correct, and doesn’t warrant our attention. I don’t get this.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.